Old school Chicago's quality level is incredible, marvelous, astounding...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richie

Member
I'm no connoisseur of the band, so I'm not the most qualified to make the OP to a thread like this. But a topic praising the downright glorious quality of Chicago's early years wasn't anywhere to be seen (not within my search), and the absence of such a thread a crime that I had to remedy, even with my limited knowledge.

It all began when a friend of mine who's a DJ and loves 60's music introduced me to their song "I'm A Man". Accustomed to their love ballad style of the 80's (think "You're The Inspiration"), I was blown away by the extremely different, but absolutely exquisite mood of the band in its first steps. What an orgasmic guitar they had in store, courtesy of musical genius Terry Kath, who basically made love to his instrument in every single song. She sent another other two songs my way (25 or 6 To 4, Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is). I was in awe.

But what really forced me to create this thread was that, earlier this year was the 45th anniversary of Chicago's very first album, The Chicago Transit Authority (as they called themselves back then). Hence, my friend playing this album in its entirety...And it really is something to behold, that they could cram out so many damn classics in their very first try! Introduction, Beginnings, Questions 67 and 68, Listen, Poem 58, South California Purples....And there's still songs I'm missing to hear! (listening to it live as I type this thread)...I'm genuinely impressed at the sheer quality in display, and again, it's their damn debut album. Can't wait to stop being ignorant and explore the band's early years in depth. What a band. What music.

So come here, GAFers! Those of you who haven't heard this side of Chicago, come and give your ears a treat...and those who know it all well, come here and discuss the genius of this band!

Also, my friend is telling me Chicago's not in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Fuck them and their couch.
 
gea6Evh.jpg
 
I walked in on my parents fucking to Chicago once. This thread brought back some horrible memories. Dick.

Chicago, churned out classics that remain legendary after all these years, and likely took a part in the creation of user richardhawk; is there anything they couldn't do?

I guess you should have spent your Saturday. In the park. (I think it was the fourth of July.)

Glorious.
 
Any time I talk about disappointing concerts around family, my mom always says, "At least you didn't go see Chicago." She saw them twice in the 70s and said they were terrible both times.
 
I'm a big Chicago fan and love their first album, but I'm a Man isn't their song. It's a cover of a Spencer Davis Group song. Still though, their first few albums are pretty special.
 
Yes, early (pre-80s) Chicago is awesome. It's that era that I think of when someone mentions Chicago. The 80s era were great, too. Man, they just don't make mainstream music like that anymore. I wish I could've gone to the Earth, Wind, and Fire/Chicago concert tour that happened a few years ago. That would've been mind-blowing!
 
Any time I talk about disappointing concerts around family, my mom always says, "At least you didn't go see Chicago." She saw them twice in the 70s and said they were terrible both times.

I saw them in '86. Terrible then, too. So at least they're consistent. (They opened for the Beach Boys, who were amazing and I don't even like the Beach Boys.)

But yeah OP's right, that first album especially (CTA) ... had a great and unique sound.
 
Any time I talk about disappointing concerts around family, my mom always says, "At least you didn't go see Chicago." She saw them twice in the 70s and said they were terrible both times.

Did she, by any chance, go see them in the end of the 70's? As in, 1978/79? Terry Kath died in January that year, it'd go a long way to explain the band's disappointing concerts. A shame in either case though.

I'm a big Chicago fan and love their first album, but I'm a Man isn't their song. It's a cover of a Spencer Davis Group song. Still though, their first few albums are pretty special.

She told me this too, but I forgot to mention it in the OP. I personally prefer their take on the tune; the original is good, but their rendition elevates it to another league.

25 or 6 to 4 is a marching band standard, but yeah they were groovier before Peter Cetera turned them into Air Supply.

Yes, early (pre-80s) Chicago is awesome. It's that era that I think of when someone mentions Chicago. The 80s era were great, too. Man, they just don't make mainstream music like that anymore. I wish I could've gone to the Earth, Wind, and Fire/Chicago concert tour that happened a few years ago. That would've been mind-blowing!

Not that I know much of the band's 80's period either (even if that's the one that gets 100% of radio airtime where I live), but I think it's rather cool how they managed to reinvent themselves entirely after Kath's death, eventually striking a new identity that had nothing to do with their roots, but still made for pleasant music in its own right.

I saw them in '86. Terrible then, too. So at least they're consistent. (They opened for the Beach Boys, who were amazing and I don't even like the Beach Boys.)

But yeah OP's right, that first album especially (CTA) ... had a great and unique sound.

The more I read on the band the more it seems like it was changing talents very often. In 1986 Dawayne Bailey started to play guitar and vocals for them, if Wikipedia is to be believed. Very curious, wondering now if a GAFer has a positive anecdote of Chicago's concerts? And yeah...The album just finished, and it cements the band's then-demolishing talent in my eyes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom