On a scale of 1-10, how weird are your fetishes?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course they are. The wide spectrum of something as common as sex ranges from what orifices used, to WHERE you use those orifices, to where you finish, what you wear, what you DON'T wear, HOW it's done, and etc.

And that's before you get into anything "weird" at all!

One must create a scale, lest the entire thread is people posting numbers that mean nothing, and we can't have THAT, can we? This discussion MUST be scientific!

Is your fetish jumping into "on a scale from 1-10, what's your weirdest fetish?" boards and trying to apply the scientific method to the process? And if so, where would that rank on the scale? I'm confused.
 
I think we're getting a little too scientific here. One person's 3 is another person's 8 in the world of porn, so I can't see a person's sexual fetishes being easily lumped into some sort of quantifiable and constant scale like that.

The thing is if you're not into someone else's fetish then it probably ranks around the same number as another person who isn't into it. The baseline for objective weirdness would basically be how the average person would react to hearing your particular fetish.
 
Man crossdressing hentai has confused me so much, I know that "trap" is not quite the proper term for these characters (not referring to real people) if anyone knows a better term please correct, but male characters that are basically indistinguishable from females in clothes have worked their way into my fetishes.
 
Is your fetish jumping into "on a scale from 1-10, what's your weirdest fetish?" boards and trying to apply the scientific method to the process? And if so, where would that rank on the scale? I'm confused.

Quantifiable data makes me soooo horny.

It's why I'm an economics major.
 
I'd say my fetishes are around a 7.5, guessing from the Gaf thread on one of them, most people would say its pretty fucked up, though not serial killer levels of fucked.

No, I'm not referring to the pegging OT.
 
Man crossdressing hentai has confused me so much, I know that "trap" is not quite the proper term for these characters (not referring to real people) if anyone knows a better term please correct, but male characters that are basically indistinguishable from females in clothes have worked their way into my fetishes.

That's a 1, subject to modifiers based on how, why, and what they do, while dressed.

Your correct term is otokonoko, unless they are transgender, in which case, your correct term would be your basic female pronouns, assuming they identify as such, or unless they're Felix from Re:Zero in which case your correct term is otokoneko :^)
 
Inserting eggs into an orifice through a tentacle or 'stinger'.

Example (NSFW, no nudity just a sex toy): this is a dildo that 'lays eggs' in people.

giphy.gif


This thread became worse since I last saw it
 
So, to recap, your "weirdness" is smushed down into a 1-5 scale, thus correcting some biases people have based on grossness and etc., that OTHERS might not.

Then, you have a modifier of +5 for anything nonconsensual. Despite what you may think, nonconsent IS a fetish. Yes, even that far.

Further modifiers are intent, transpecies interactions(sentient multiplies this by 1, nonsentient adds 1 to a max of 5), and other included fetishes.
 
That's a 1, subject to modifiers based on how, why, and what they do, while dressed.

Your correct term is otokonoko, unless they are transgender, in which case, your correct term would be your basic female pronouns, assuming they identify as such.

It sure doesn't feel like a one when I'm looking at it, but you're right, it's essentially gay porn, which by defualt is a one. So it's me looking at gay porn but I have no attraction to the conventional male, fetishes are complex, man.
 
Of course they are. The wide spectrum of something as common as sex ranges from what orifices used, to WHERE you use those orifices, to where you finish, what you wear, what you DON'T wear, HOW it's done, and etc.

And that's before you get into anything "weird" at all!

One must create a scale, lest the entire thread is people posting numbers that mean nothing, and we can't have THAT, can we? This discussion MUST be scientific!

1 - missionary vanilla sex with hand holding
2 - sex toys in the bedroom, food in the bedroom
3 - light BDSM
4 - swinging, cuckoldry, exhibitionism
5 - BDSM, pegging, rimming
6 - tentacles, watersports
7 - rape (the fetish, not the crime. consent is present)
8 - furry, anthro, dickgirls
9 - scat, vomit, beastiality
10 - pedophilia, gore, dismemberment, necrophilia, crushing
 
actually, I felt the spoiler-text wasn't that weird. I think the dude, who zip locks his date's stolen panties to preserve those odours to be more of an 8.

I don't think I'm a 15 either, but that probably depends on what you rate
watersports
, I guess. :)

Well yeah, that dude's a freak. :P
 
It sure doesn't feel like a one when I'm looking at it, but you're right, it's essentially gay porn, which by defualt is a one. So it's me looking at gay porn but I have no attraction to the conventional male, fetishes are complex, man.

Wanna get really confused? Futanari stuff is probably up your alley.
 
1 - missionary vanilla sex with hand holding
2 - sex toys in the bedroom, food in the bedroom
3 - light BDSM
4 - swinging, cuckoldry, exhibitionism
5 - BDSM, pegging, rimming
6 - tentacles, watersports
7 - rape
8 - furry, anthro, dickgirls
9 - scat, vomit, beastiality
10 - pedophilia, gore, dismemberment, necrophilia, crushing

See I'm into gore and dismemberment but would rank scat worse, and pedophilia worser.

Also furry/anthro isn't above rape, and 'dickgirls' probably isn't the best term for what you mean. And even if it were, that's worse than rape? wut
 
1 - missionary vanilla sex with hand holding
2 - sex toys in the bedroom, food in the bedroom
3 - light BDSM
4 - swinging, cuckoldry, exhibitionism
5 - BDSM, pegging, rimming
6 - tentacles, watersports
7 - rape
8 - furry, anthro, dickgirls
9 - scat, vomit, beastiality
10 - pedophilia, gore, dismemberment, necrophilia, crushing

How is furry stuff worse than rape?
 
It sure doesn't feel like a one when I'm looking at it, but you're right, it's essentially gay porn, which by defualt is a one. So it's me looking at gay porn but I have no attraction to the conventional male, fetishes are complex, man.

You are focusing on other characteristics, most likely. If they LOOK like a girl, then your body is like to respond as such. Then you have other modifiers, too. The discovery, humiliation, or anything that happens to them. You may ALSO be putting yourself in their flats, imagining the soft breeze of a ceiling fan on your hairless legs, encapsulated within sheer stockings, that gives you the urge to brush them together (and to shake the shiver down your spine).
 
How is furry stuff worse than rape?

i'm not referring to the crime of rape but rape fetish

like there are people who are into the fantasy of rape but would never rape someone

I think furry, anthro etc is worse than rape because it involves animals but that's just my opinion
 
Wanna get really confused? Futanari stuff is probably up your alley.

Oh I've been into that stuff for far longer, but I break it down real simple, it's all girls, one has a dick so you get that aspect of sex that yuri doesn't really cover, and I don't think strapons really fufill that role. So it's lesbians without having to be softcore (I know not all yuri is softcore, but most of it is).
 
1 - missionary vanilla sex with hand holding
2 - sex toys in the bedroom, food in the bedroom
3 - light BDSM
4 - swinging, cuckoldry, exhibitionism
5 - BDSM, pegging, rimming
6 - tentacles, watersports
7 - rape
8 - furry, anthro, dickgirls
9 - scat, vomit, beastiality
10 - pedophilia, gore, dismemberment, necrophilia, crushing
Tdh7p8t.gif
 
Inserting eggs into an orifice through a tentacle or 'stinger'.

Example (NSFW, no nudity just a sex toy): this is a dildo that 'lays eggs' in people.

Oh man, I actually met the people who make and sell these at a con in Boston early this year. They were super nice and also REALLY wanted me to buy one. I almost did.

edit - it comes with an egg jello mold. You're supposed to get plain gelatin to make the eggs so that they can dissolve inside you.
 
See I'm into gore and dismemberment but would rank scat worse, and pedophilia worser.

Also furry/anthro isn't above rape, and 'dickgirls' probably isn't the best term for what you mean. And even if it were, that's worse than rape? wut
Maybe he means rape fantasies.

Also there are various "levels" of pedophilia. From reading lolicon comics (which i would rate as 7 or 8) up to some incredibly disgusting stuff you don't want to know about.
 
See I'm into gore and dismemberment but would rank scat worse, and pedophilia worser.

Also furry/anthro isn't above rape, and 'dickgirls' probably isn't the best term for what you mean. And even if it were, that's worse than rape? wut

dickgirls = futa but I wasn't sure if people would recognize the term

I think rape fetish is comparatively more normal than futa fetish
 
i'm not referring to the crime of rape but rape fetish

like there are people who are into the fantasy of rape but would never rape someone

I think furry, anthro etc is worse than rape because it involves animals but that's just my opinion

Remember, we're talking about sentient consenting animals with human traits here. There's feral furry porn though, which is closer to what I think you were getting at.
 
I like eating ass. My favorite place to cum is the area between the side of a girls neck and shoulder. I'm turned on by feet, and will suck the shit out of some well manicured toes. I like girls who talk shit while having sex as a forme of negative reinforcement, like "Your dick aint shit, am I even being fucked right now?" I'd let a girl milk my prostate. One of my biggest turn ons, is on road trips, I like having sex in dirty gas station bathrooms. I have a fantasy of being watched while having sex, so I have a giant poster of American Gothic over my bed. Flossing my teeth with a girls pubes.

Don't know what that amounts too numerically?

On a scale from 1-10, yo ass hit 11.
 
You are focusing on other characteristics, most likely. If they LOOK like a girl, then your body is like to respond as such. Then you have other modifiers, too. The discovery, humiliation, or anything that happens to them. You may ALSO be putting yourself in their flats, imagining the soft breeze of a ceiling fan on your hairless legs, encapsulated within sheer stockings, that gives you the urge to brush them together (and to shake the shiver down your spine).

That putting myself into their positions angle is something that is quite rare for me to get into the mindset of, but yeah I'm sure I'm just putting to much weight on certain aspects. As for your detail of the images, I don't think I quite have that imagination, save that for literotica (lol).

As for a chart, I'm glad you have something established. A 1-10 scale should not be made in relation for the average person, but as a way to rate all things in the realm of fetishism. An average person may think pegging as a 7, but to rate is as such we would need a larger scale, or else the gradient turn into a modern video game score scale.
 
i'm not referring to the crime of rape but rape fetish

like there are people who are into the fantasy of rape but would never rape someone

I think furry, anthro etc is worse than rape because it involves animals but that's just my opinion

But then you'd have to assume that furries and/or anthro stuff ARE animals, which is probably astep too far. Though they have animal characteristics, they are anthropomorphic (thus, anthro as slang), and, since the great majority of the time, they are sentient (along the line as humans), they'd be no more than a 2 on a 1-5 consensual scale.

As for rape, this is why intent modifiers come into play. If the intent, and the intent of the other, is to satisfy a rape fetish, then it's less "weird" than if either of their intents were malicious(then it's criminal, but certainly possible to satisfy one person's fetish). If either one of them are nonconsenting(thus making it the heinous crime), I would put it at the highest part of the scale -- a 10, or a 5N.

Doing it this way allows me to put everything in graph form.
 
i'm not referring to the crime of rape but rape fetish

like there are people who are into the fantasy of rape but would never rape someone

I think furry, anthro etc is worse than rape because it involves animals but that's just my opinion

Uh... Furry stuff is equivalent to alien fantasies, not bestiality.
 
dickgirls = futa but I wasn't sure if people would recognize the term

I think rape fetish is comparatively more normal than futa fetish

When I hear 'futa' I think hermaphrodite. But 'dickgirl' registers as a derogatory in the same vein as 'shemale' as it relates to the fetishizing of transwomen. Which is more common than many are willing to accept. But maybe my understanding of the terms is wrong and contrary to how you were using it.

Dude didn't say rape fantasy. He said rape and non-consensual sex. Rape role-play is still consentual.

I wasn't responding to 'dude'. I was responding to your first sentence seeking clarification.
 
1 - missionary vanilla sex with hand holding
2 - sex toys in the bedroom, food in the bedroom
3 - light BDSM
4 - swinging, cuckoldry, exhibitionism
5 - BDSM, pegging, rimming
6 - tentacles, watersports
7 - rape (the fetish, not the crime. consent is present)
8 - furry, anthro, dickgirls
9 - scat, vomit, beastiality
10 - pedophilia, gore, dismemberment, necrophilia, crushing

Sorry folks, I'm out.

tumblr_nrrpd44R6Y1u9taavo1_400.gif
 
When I hear 'futa' I think hermaphrodite. But 'dickgirl' registers as a derogatory in the same vein of 'shemale' as it relates to the fetishizing of transwomen. Which is more common than many are willing to accept. But maybe my understanding of the terms is wrong and contrary to how you were using it.

when I say dickgirl I'm not referring to trans, just futa. that's literally what futa is, girls with dicks. while trans encompasses so much more than that.

Uh... Furry stuff is equivalent to alien fantasies, not bestiality.

But then you'd have to assume that furries and/or anthro stuff ARE animals, which is probably astep too far. Though they have animal characteristics, they are anthropomorphic (thus, anthro as slang), and, since the great majority of the time, they are sentient (along the line as humans), they'd be no more than a 2 on a 1-5 consensual scale.

As for rape, this is why intent modifiers come into play. If the intent, and the intent of the other, is to satisfy a rape fetish, then it's less "weird" than if either of their intents were malicious(then it's criminal, but certainly possible to satisfy one person's fetish). If either one of them are nonconsenting(thus making it the heinous crime), I would put it at the highest part of the scale -- a 10, or a 5N.

Doing it this way allows me to put everything in graph form.

I don't have a furry fetish so I can't say I ever thought of it that way. But my initial reasoning for putting them that high up was based on how common/accepted the particular fetish is. Perhaps I'm underestimating how normalized furry as a fetish is.
 
I don't have a furry fetish so I can't say I ever thought of it that way. But my initial reasoning for putting them that high up was based on how common/accepted the particular fetish is. Perhaps I'm underestimating how normalized furry as a fetish is.

Think of it like this, people like Furries because they're sentient humanoids that have characteristics that make them seem more wild and exotic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom