BUST
Like how next? B450/X470/X570/B550 will support Ryzen 4000, but it'll be the last gen on a AM4 socket then we'll get DDR5 rams and the socket will have to be changed.
Oh ok thanks for the info on that. Ryzen 4000 was what I was looking at. With an x570
I think the next Ryzen CPU's are going to be the last of AM4.
I might be wrong, but DDR5 ain't too far away. But then again, ryzen 4000 series is the last gen AM4 socket, if DDR5 for consumers only in 2022? What's it gonna be in 2021? Make a gap I would guess, because releasing something would leave us with no upgrade path.
No, not just 200+fps 1080p, but for gaming at that resolution with $1.3k GPU.
There practically is no use case for this abomination, bar "I want to stick with this company".
And even with this "gaming champion" in newer games one risks seeing this (XCOM: Chimera Squad)
It's ok,Leonidas will hug you to sleep.
Yeah, in any case, as they are expected at around September and are rumored to have 2 digit IPC bump.
What is gaming champion even supposed to mean, because the game barely taxes CPU's at all.
Now lets look at that benchmark.
9900k performing like a 2600 ryzen yea seems totally legit and about right, what did they even do with that 9900k? did they underclock it or something? because there is no way in hell that 9900k is losing out on a 3600.
Here's another one from the same game.
Oh now it makes sense. maybe that bencher should recheck his 9900k system, its probably burned down or something. Obviously critical thinking lacks with AMD fanboy n1 illien because you know even looking for 2 seconds at that benchmark would tell you something is up.
Oh and that's base clock by the way. imagine ocing that thing to 5ghz on all cores.
Anyway this game barely taxes CPU's it seems tho, 200 fps is kinda weak sauce taxation. Go play anno 1800 or ac odyssey and see your fps sit around the 60/30 fps minimums even at 720p with ultra settings on a 9900k, higher resolutions aren't going to change any of this or any gpu for that matter other than lower then that performance.
This is why resolution arguments are laughable at best because GPU's get faster and replaced more often then CPU's at the end which will make that difference even more noticable the longer u have the CPU in your system.
Dat moment when u can't come with arguments but needs to shout random shit in order to validate your garbage. It's a typical intel/amd thread where amd fanboys endlessly shit up reality because it doesn't favor there mentally invested stocks they got in AMD there company.
They try to spin reality in such way everything is shit when it comes to intel but god its amazing when AMD does it and its great. By posting all kinds of bullshit charts, useless benchmarks done with useless metrics. Have a good one i won't be reacting to your troll posts anymore that's for sure, and i would appreciate it if you would stop quoting me in the future also.
Why are the AMD CPUs with 248 and 250 coming behind Intel's 240 in that graph?What is gaming champion even supposed to mean, because the game barely taxes CPU's at all.
Now lets look at that benchmark.
9900k performing like a 2600 ryzen yea seems totally legit and about right, what did they even do with that 9900k? did they underclock it or something? because there is no way in hell that 9900k is losing out on a 3600.
Here's another one from the same game.
Oh now it makes sense. maybe that bencher should recheck his 9900k system, its probably burned down or something. Obviously critical thinking lacks with AMD fanboy n1 illien because you know even looking for 2 seconds at that benchmark would tell you something is up.
Oh and that's base clock by the way. imagine ocing that thing to 5ghz on all cores.
Anyway this game barely taxes CPU's it seems tho, 200 fps is kinda weak sauce taxation. Go play anno 1800 or ac odyssey and see your fps sit around the 60/30 fps minimums even at 720p with ultra settings on a 9900k, higher resolutions aren't going to change any of this or any gpu for that matter other than lower then that performance.
This is why resolution arguments are laughable at best because GPU's get faster and replaced more often then CPU's at the end which will make that difference even more noticable the longer u have the CPU in your system.
Dat moment when u can't come with arguments but needs to shout random shit in order to validate your garbage. It's a typical intel/amd thread where amd fanboys endlessly shit up reality because it doesn't favor there mentally invested stocks they got in AMD there company.
They try to spin reality in such way everything is shit when it comes to intel but god its amazing when AMD does it and its great. By posting all kinds of bullshit charts, useless benchmarks done with useless metrics. Have a good one i won't be reacting to your troll posts anymore that's for sure, and i would appreciate it if you would stop quoting me in the future also.
