Astray
Member
If everyone never buys any new games then the entire industry would have shrunk ages ago.Tldr- we don't know
Someone somewhere must be buying games new. Not knowing the exact numbers doesn't mean we can't make inferences.
If everyone never buys any new games then the entire industry would have shrunk ages ago.Tldr- we don't know
Lmao whatIt take about 2 years of patching for new AAA games to become stable enough on PC
???This is a a thread about STEAM users.
You frequently comment without reading, to the point where I genuinely question if you are illiterate or something.
I doubt the mix on PS5/Xbox is much different outside of annualized releases like sports games, CoD et al. GaaS games are by far the most successful games in both engagement and revenue. It's going to be all Fortnite, Roblox, Minecraft, Apex etc if we had open source data as good as Steam offers.
It’s not just buying. They buy the new games, too. But they mostly play the old ones.People buying cheap old games.
Crazy number though.
I gamed on PC almost exclusively this year and couldn’t disagree more. There is plenty of stuff to buy that’s not woke or bug ridden.
Even the so-called bad games like Star Wars outlaws had amazing graphics and tech I couldnt wait to check out.
This year alone, I played:
- Dragons Dogma 2
- Indy
- Black Myth Wukong
- Silent Hill 2
- Space Marine 2
- Dragon Age Veilguard
- Nobody Wants to Die
- Star Wars Outlaws
- No Rest For the Wicked
- Suicide Squad
- Brothers Remake
- Stalker
- Hellblade 2
Of these games, only Dragon Age was woke. Only Suicide Squad was truly bad. And only stalker was truly buggy.
The rest were non-woke, mostly good to great games that released in a decent state on PC.
I honestly dont know how real gamers can dismiss so many games, let alone PC gamers who want to play the latest and greatest on their new shiny graphics cards. As a console gamer, I bought everything on consoles on day one because i truly enjoy video games more than movies, sports, tv shows, and music. I dont waste money on concerts. I dont buy onlyfans subs. i have my one MLB sub but thats about it. Games are my passion and its insane to me that people would dismiss 85% of the games for these arbitrary reasons.
Amount of time spent playing games is only tangentially related to buying them. And buying games in the year of release is only a small part of the entire industry, even just ignoring continuing sales we already know that Sony make more a lot more revenue from selling add-on content than from selling actual games.If everyone never buys any new games then the entire industry would have shrunk ages ago.
Someone somewhere must be buying games new. Not knowing the exact numbers doesn't mean we can't make inferences.
This is talking specifically about Steam, not PC using Epic, GOG, Direct2Drive, etc. PC was my primary system. I'm not sure why you haven't done this, but every PC gamer I knew growing up bought games day one even while we played older games.
And this isn't exclusive to PC either.
On the PS5, I can go back and play terrific games from the 70s and onward. On the Switch, it's the same thing. Etc, so having BC isn't exclusive to PC. I have 100s of physical games on PC I still play sometimes, but I still play new games on PC too.
PC does have generations. It's even in the wording of new CPUs and GPUs. When giant leaps happen on hardware, that's a new generation. You can still use you old hardware to play most games (same with consoles), but there is a leap forward.
Weird seeing people trying to frame this as a terrible thing.
As of February 2024, Stardew Valley has sold over 30 million copies across all platforms, with over 19 million copies sold on PC alone.
would consoles really be that different if we were to cut out on the sports titles and the yearly cods? Seems to me live service is rampant there as well.
PS and Nintendo have old games/platforms that they could easily bring back with endless generations just by going digital-only.There are far more old games than new games?
PC also has infinite backwards compatibility.
It's much worse for consoles because of their continued use of physical media.It's a nothing burger and first reply already nailed it. The evergreen games take 100s of hours of player's time and we're likely looking at similar number on consoles.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I've definitely spent less on new games this year, and the major reason is - they're too expensive. They've priced themselves out of my budget.
On PS5 and Switch, someone can play BC games from the 1970s? How does someone do that unless it's a re-released digital copy someone has to re-buy again?This is talking specifically about Steam, not PC using Epic, GOG, Direct2Drive, etc. PC was my primary system. I'm not sure why you haven't done this, but every PC gamer I knew growing up bought games day one even while we played older games.
And this isn't exclusive to PC either.
On the PS5, I can go back and play terrific games from the 70s and onward. On the Switch, it's the same thing. Etc, so having BC isn't exclusive to PC. I have 100s of physical games on PC I still play sometimes, but I still play new games on PC too.
PC does have generations. It's even in the wording of new CPUs and GPUs. When giant leaps happen on hardware, that's a new generation. You can still use you old hardware to play most games (same with consoles), but there is a leap forward.
PS and Nintendo have old games/platforms that they could easily bring back with endless generations just by going digital-only.
It's much worse for consoles because of their continued use of physical media.
Consoles have no data on how much time users spend on old consoles instead of on new consoles.
Hello there fellow Paradoxer. I also spent more time this year playing EU IV, Stellaris and some CK3/Vicky 3 vs anything else, lol.I mostly play a game released over 10 years ago, but it's Paradox, so there's always new DLC. I'm not very interested in modern gaming.
Release good games the majority wants to play, and don’t sell them for $70-$100+.PCMR, when will you start supporting our hobby?
laughs in 3,317 Steam games owned lol
More than I do now.How many brand new games did you buy when they were $60 dollars?
Weird seeing people trying to frame this as a terrible thing.
Seriously. One of the many beautiful things about PC gaming is how far you can extend the lifespan of older games through hardware upgrades, community fixes, mods, etc. That players are choosing to spend most of their time revisiting classics or devoting themselves to high-quality evergreen titles rather than simply consuming the newest AAA slop and moving on is awesome, as far as I'm concerned.
Only 15% of all Steam users' time was spent playing games released in 2024
Steam's end-of-year review of what we play and how we play makes for some interesting reading.www.pcgamer.com
PCMR, when will you start supporting our hobby?
laughs in 3,317 Steam games owned lol
What this translates to is PCMR doesn't have any good games to play. Sad.Release good games the majority wants to play, and don’t sell them for $70-$100+.
Also, we don’t always want to play console games or cinematic games all the time. We can do that on the other consoles we own.
Lastly, We like to mod games, it’s fun, let us do that and it will build its own community and take off from there.
Basically, make a game that feels like it’s from the early to late 2000’s with modern graphics, that doesn’t rely on tricks and runs smooth, that we are allowed to mod any way we please for $40. It would sell like hot cakes and an indie dev would make a ton. Just be fun.
Not just a console vs PCMR angle mate, we all get PC has an extensive BC catalogue but if people spend time playing older games (2023 and older) and not buying games on PC it is not a great trend for publishers.Some weird but not surprising replies from our resident console only guys. I'm actually surprised its as high as 15%, when PC gamers literally have tens of thousands of games available to them, from their whole gaming history in many cases.
When we are talking 2024 games only, i would have guessed more like 5%, or 10% at the most.
Maybe that was why Game Science were crying. Lack of sales on PC.Not just a console vs PCMR angle mate, we all get PC has an extensive BC catalogue but if people spend time playing older games (2023 and older) and not buying games on PC it is not a great trend for publishers.
We know people look for sales everywhere but a stat like this would talk poorly about the value of PC customers for newly released non longeve GaaS titles.
Some weird but not surprising replies from our resident console only guys. I'm actually surprised its as high as 15%, when PC gamers literally have tens of thousands of games available to them, from their whole gaming history in many cases.
When we are talking 2024 games only, i would of guessed more like 5%, or 10% at the most.
This is inherently not true, we just play the good ones for extended period of time or wait till the $70 go on steam sale.What this translates to is PCMR doesn't have any good games to play. Sad.
Why do you love spreading misinformation and being so dishonest? It’s insanely annoying.Check any uk sales thread.
What this translates to is PCMR doesn't have any good games to play. Sad.
99.99% of games were released before the current year. That players spent 15% of their time on current releases is disproportionately high in favor of new games.Not just a console vs PCMR angle mate, we all get PC has an extensive BC catalogue but if people spend time playing older games (2023 and older) and not buying games on PC it is not a great trend for publishers.
We know people look for sales everywhere but a stat like this would talk poorly about the value of PC customers for newly released non longeve GaaS titles.
PCMR, when will you start supporting our hobby?
Did you miss what I replied to? I was clearly joking.This is inherently not true, we just play the good ones for extended period of time or wait till the $70 go on steam sale.
Went over my head. My bad.Did you miss what I replied to? I was clearly joking.