Support NeoGAF

[Gamer79]

I am a 1440p native in slower moving titles and faster moving ones I will move to 1440p with DLSS Quality or 1080p native resolution. I know DLSS is better than FSR but for the poll sake I am going to group same type of groups. I am not putting medium because it makes little since to me to play at medium when DLSS/FSR can just upscale to a higher quality. Unless in cases you have a very specific build or a low end build.

 

[Celcius]

Most games at 4K native resolution, max settings
A few like FF16 require DLSS

 

[SyberWolf]

depends on the game.
if it can run native 1440p-4K then native.
dips below 60? then DLSS/FSR
still dips? framegen if supported.

 

[Magic Carpet]

depends on the game.
if it can run native 1440p-4K then native.
dips below 60? then DLSS/FSR
still dips? framegen if supported.

Pretty much this except I will drop 4K to 1080 before I enable frame gen.

 

[Fess]

1440p on one PC, 4K on another. Native if I can but lately DLSS Quality on most games. Don’t know how to vote so skipping that.

 

[LectureMaster]

 

[Filben]

UWQHD (3440x1440) at DLSS quality. If performance allows, DLAA.

 

[analog_future]

Usually 4K DLSS Quality. But I will do 4K DLAA if my 4090 can perform at ~80fps or better with it on.

 

[mèx]

In general I play at native 1080p at max settings with my current config. I can get around 120 FPS on most games, with some pushing 240.

I use DLAA instead of TAA if available. I don't use DLSS upscaling as it doesn't look good at 1080p. It can look decent with a 0.83333334 scaling factor via DLSSTweaks in some games, but I usually avoid it.
I use frame generation if available and implemented well, as long as the minimum framerate is above 60.

 

[Mhmmm 2077]

if I can run at 4K ultra native, I do that, if cannot, I'll use FSR.

 

[Pegasus Actual]

1440p and whatever pushes 150+ fps. If I'm CPU limited I'll turn the graphics up. If you're allowed to turn dynamic shadows completely off, I generally won't do that in a multiplayer game.

 

[Nankatsu]

1440P FSR Quality. Average 100+ FPS.

 

[Interfectum]

4k DLSS/FSSR Quality

 

[The Cockatrice]

1440p and the votes prove that 4k is only an elitist minority.

 

[Kronark]

1440p Native - 165 Hz - High / Medium settings.

I can't stand the way DLSS looks. All the edges get soft and you end up with a shimmer along edges too sometimes. Bleh I'd rather just turn the settings down a bit. FSR is also bad. They've become a crutch for lazy development processes with devs expecting DLSS / FSR to make up for the fact that their game runs at 20-40 FPS (Looking at you Alan Wake 2...).

 

[Crayon]

Always go for a 1440p final. Usually with a quality scaling but not always.

For settings, try high, then ultra. Some games there's no performance difference, some there is no fidelity difference. If it looks better and runs slower on ultra, just got to find those one or two settings that have an outsized impact.

No heavy rt for me, though. Only the light rt stuff, if that.

 

[DirtInUrEye]

Either 4K DLSS Balanced or Performance, depending on the game. Optimised settings, meaning mostly Ultra, but with the couple of usual suspects turned down to High or Medium. 80-90fps target in single player titles. Normally lock to 100 in multiplayer stuff. Use an Xbox Elite 2 gamepad for all games.

 

[Mister Wolf]

4K DLSS Quality.

 

[rodrigolfp]

3440x1440p or more with super sampling. Settings depends on the how "heavy" is the game, overall "ultra", but never max shadows, DoF, motion blur, CA, vignette, film grain...

 

[Gamer79]

1440p Native - 165 Hz - High / Medium settings.

I can't stand the way DLSS looks. All the edges get soft and you end up with a shimmer along edges too sometimes. Bleh I'd rather just turn the settings down a bit. FSR is also bad. They've become a crutch for lazy development processes with devs expecting DLSS / FSR to make up for the fact that their game runs at 20-40 FPS (Looking at you Alan Wake 2...).

IN some games DLSS looks better than native and others not so much

 

[Mithos]

1080p, Native, Ultra @ 60fps.

 

[KyoZz]

3440x1440 with a 4090, and I use DLAA in 99% of the games If it's not available I mod it in or I upscale @125% then use DLSS quality. If DLSS is just not there I upscale my games at 125/200% to get a picture as clean as possible.

And maxed out, of course

 

[Topher]

DLSS Balanced

 

[Reizo Ryuu]

depends, some games will run fine at UHD, some I'll use upscaling, others that allow the resolution percentage I just lower that, or I set it to 1440p no upscaling; generally whatever setting it autodetected for me, which mostly is high, not max.

 

[Kronark]

IN some games DLSS looks better than native and others not so much

I think DLSS makes sense in some cases with 4k displays / content because of the hardware requirements involved with a 4x resolution bump, but putting DLSS on your 1080p game just feels lazy and I have yet to encounter a game where it didn't just end up looking worse than native. Maybe it's a personal thing but I like sharp clean edges and high frame rates, even at the cost of texture quality.

 

[Antwix]

1440p + fsr. depends on the game whether quality/perf/balanced

 

[cinnamonandgravy]

4k native or DLSS quality, depending on the game

but always 4k

 

[Mortisfacio]

I can't decide on which 4k monitor to get, so it's still 1440p for me. I've been underutilizing my 4090

 

[FunkMiller]

My old ass eyes can't really see any difference in 4k or 1440, so I play at that resolution with everything maxxed out and DLSS balanced. On my Legion Pro 7 with big external monitor everything runs like butter, so I'm more than happy.

 

[Thebonehead]

Was a difficult one to pick as even with a 4090... It depends.

I went 4k dlss quality but with some games it may be native 4k with DLAA. Black ops, space marine 2


Others could be quality dlss with frame gen. Cyberpunk, Indiana Jones.

Basically want a good frame rate to drive 240hz QD oled at the best quality I can

 

[daninthemix]

I voted 4K DLSS Quality and that seems to be the majority vote.