TarpitCarnivore
Member
Ultimately, they got a nice payday.
Not a bad way to end their tale.
Did you read the article? They got 40 million when they owe more than that in debt.
What they got was a savings from complete and total bankruptcy
Ultimately, they got a nice payday.
Not a bad way to end their tale.
I think that it says that Kickstarter is typically large enough to launch a successful product, but not a successful company.
Sure. And they did that, with the original Pebble. Then they became a real company that was producing hardware and getting on actual retail shelves.
The fact they then went BACK to Kickstarter for new models shows how exceedingly desperate or exceedingly shameless they were.
They had manufacturing partners, support structure, office space, hardware designers, etc. They should not be going back to Kickstarter unless (a) they are so bad at business (or their product so terrible) they cannot self-fund/get normal investment for new models, or (b) they are shameless scumbags going back to the teat of Kickstarter for free money.
This is ignorance. Look up Peak Design.Sure. And they did that, with the original Pebble. Then they became a real company that was producing hardware and getting on actual retail shelves.
The fact they then went BACK to Kickstarter for new models shows how exceedingly desperate or exceedingly shameless they were.
They had manufacturing partners, support structure, office space, hardware designers, etc. They should not be going back to Kickstarter unless (a) they are so bad at business (or their product so terrible) they cannot self-fund/get normal investment for new models, or (b) they are shameless scumbags going back to the teat of Kickstarter for free money.
Sure. And they did that, with the original Pebble. Then they became a real company that was producing hardware and getting on actual retail shelves.
The fact they then went BACK to Kickstarter for new models shows how exceedingly desperate or exceedingly shameless they were.
They had manufacturing partners, support structure, office space, hardware designers, etc. They should not be going back to Kickstarter unless (a) they are so bad at business (or their product so terrible) they cannot self-fund/get normal investment for new models, or (b) they are shameless scumbags going back to the teat of Kickstarter for free money.
This is sad. My Kickstarter Pebble is still the best smartwatch I've ever seen. Great battery life, perfect functionality, fun watchfaces. No needless functionality, dumb touchscreen, lightweight...
I loathe the day my Pebble will die and I'll have to go to another shitty smartwatch (or go back to a regular watch, shudder).
Yes please. I really liked Pebbles e-ink approach, I don't want to be charging a watch every night.
Did you just fucking post a $1,200 watch as a suggestion to replace a $100 watch?
I don't think the prospective customers of those two products cross over much, if at all.
I'm not doubting those reasons can be valid but I can see others as well like free publicity of being biggest tech kickstarter yet again. Or ease of logistics processing orders without investing in any infrastructure for small fee.Sure. And they did that, with the original Pebble. Then they became a real company that was producing hardware and getting on actual retail shelves.
The fact they then went BACK to Kickstarter for new models shows how exceedingly desperate or exceedingly shameless they were.
They had manufacturing partners, support structure, office space, hardware designers, etc. They should not be going back to Kickstarter unless (a) they are so bad at business (or their product so terrible) they cannot self-fund/get normal investment for new models, or (b) they are shameless scumbags going back to the teat of Kickstarter for free money.
That version of the watch is like $300.
This is ridiculous. Kickstarter is just crowdfunding, they have a product that might not get made and say they'll make it if they get enough funding from people who want it. It just happened that they had exactly 1 product so if that didn't get funded the company shut down.
I'm not doubting those reasons can be valid but I can see others as well like free publicity of being biggest tech kickstarter yet again. Or ease of logistics processing orders without investing in any infrastructure for small fee.
Did you just fucking post a $1,200 watch as a suggestion to replace a $100 watch?
I don't think the prospective customers of those two products cross over much, if at all.
No, that definitely looks like the $1200 ceramic model.
Not happy about this at all.
I love my Time Round and will wear it until it dies.
Pebble had the right approach to smartwatches, which was watch first and smart features second and an emphasis on battery life(because honestly, no one wants to charge their watch everyday).
If you operate a company that can manufacture physical computing devices, offer a support structure for users, AND get that product on actual national retail shelves -- there is no excuse for not being able to even get a simple bank loan to cover the up-front production costs of a new model.
Pebbles are (were?) sold in the US at Target and Best Buy. They are on Amazon.
If you have product on mass-market retail shelves, and literally cannot get any sort of traditional funding (venture capital, loans) to launch a new model, then you have real problems as a going concern.
Which, I note, is born out by this news -- they obviously were a terribly run company, or had a terrible product, or both.
There is NO excuse for going to Kickstarter when you are an operating company with retail partnerships.
Anyone who remembers the hype around smartwatches and the expectations for market growth in 2014-2015 would understand why Pebble rejected a $700mil offer. If things had played out with wearables exploding in popularity, Pebble would have been a billion dollar company. But it hasn't and it's been quarter after quarter of decline for everyone including Apple.
I'm not doubting those reasons can be valid but I can see others as well like free publicity of being biggest tech kickstarter yet again. Or ease of logistics processing orders without investing in any infrastructure for small fee.
That's your opinion, ok. These are the "useless, shitty" things I do on a daily basis with my Apple Watch:
Don't bother engaging with him. He's a well known diehard Apple is amazing and can do no wrong fan.And these are all your opinions, beyond notifications and music controls an Apple Watch is pretty useless for me. I never use it outside of work hours and never feel like I'm really missing it when I'm not wearing it.
This is still ridiculous. They did have venture capital money for a time, the problem is once Apple Watch failed to impress and the market tanked and that was gone. Other companies like Motorola have no plans for new devices, they took their lumps and moved on to other things because they do other things, but for Pebble that was their thing.
But on the consumer side people loved the product and it was a good value and that's reflected in this thread. So who are you enlightening here? Happy customers?
That version of the watch is like $300.
If you were hoping the smartwatch market would bounce back from its recent slump when a slew of new models hit the market, you're about to be disappointed. IDC estimates that wearable device shipments grew ever so slightly (3.1 percent) in the third quarter of 2016, but that fitness trackers were almost exclusively responsible for the increase. Fitbit, Garmin and other activity band makers improved their shipments by the double digits, while the smartwatch world actually shrank.
Apple still leads the smartwatch sphere in these estimates, with 1.1 million Apple Watches shipped over the summer. However, that's a steep drop of roughly 70 percent year-over-year -- Apple was moving 3.9 million in the third quarter of 2015.
Tim Cook informs Reuters that the Apple Watch set an all-time high for sell-through (that is, units reaching customers and not just stores) in the first week of holiday shopping. The wristwear is likely to have its "best quarter ever," he adds.
"Our data shows that Apple Watch is doing great and looks to be one of the most popular holiday gifts this year," Cook wrote.
This is still ridiculous. They did have venture capital money for a time, the problem is once Apple Watch failed to impress and the market tanked and that was gone. Other companies like Motorola have no plans for new devices, they took their lumps and moved on to other things because they do other things, but for Pebble that was their thing.
But on the consumer side people loved the product and it was a good value and that's reflected in this thread. So who are you enlightening here? Happy customers?
Don't bother engaging with him. He's a well known diehard Apple is amazing and can do no wrong fan.
That's your opinion, ok. These are the "useless, shitty" things I do on a daily basis with my Apple Watch:
- Make payments at 80% of stores I go to
- Control all my smart home devices (lights, locks, thermostat)
- Do a shitload of things without taking my phone out of my pocket, including:
- taking and making calls
- viewing/replying to messages messages
- viewing emails
- viewing notifications
- directions and navigation
- All aspects of fitness tracking, including motivation
- Unlocking my Mac
- Setting timers, reminders
- Controlling my Apple TV (Netflix, etc)
- Browsing news headlines
- Getting a 2nd viewfinder for camera so can take shots at high/low angles, etc
- Controlling my music
- Using Siri (much more reliable than phone)
- Calling an Uber
- Check my heartrate
- Leaving my phone on silent so as to not disturb others around me, yet still receive and filter notifications
And much more. All these things, I do one-handed and take a couple seconds top each, and have really reduced the time I spend pulling my phone out and staring at it each day. It's become natural and routine and add convenience to the day. I'm not bashing the Pebble, but to call it the "best" smartwatch while pretending that other products than a shit-ton more functionality don't exist is living in a bubble. And, IMO the Apple Watch is also good looking, and is lightweight. I had a Pebble, and dropped it because I simply could not justify the usefulness or lack of functionality, beyond the fact that it looked like some cheap plastic toy that came out of a cereal box (at least the non-round version).
Don't bother engaging with him. He's a well known diehard Apple is amazing and can do no wrong fan.
Don't blame this on Apple. The entire market segment was FLOODED with cheap commodity items, especially once Garmin & Fitbit started shifting their products to be more smart. Samsung was also to the market quicker than Apple and it didn't go over well.
Perhaps, just perhaps, Pebble was not as good of a company as their user base thought.
Noted
I've really gotten a lot of use out of my Pebble Time Steel, so I'm pretty bummed to hear this.
Anyone thinking about getting a second one before the stock dries up?
I just bought a backup stainless steel band for my Pebble Time Steel.
I will run my current one into the ground until other Smart Watches can catch up to the battery life of my current Pebble.
Not really. $30 million from Fitbit vs. the $700+million offer they received last year and rejected. They flew too close to the sun and decided to steer toward it.