Hournda said:Penny Arcade?
direct linking to SA often results in a direct ban
Hournda said:Penny Arcade?
xsarien said:Who the hell asked you for an opinion on what Gabe and his wife look like?
You'd want to give him congrats until you realize his real name is MIKE and he named his kid Gabriel, after his INTERNET ALIAS based on some astronomer.
Hournda said:Why is that?
White Man said:Everyone that's read Aquinas knows that angels probably lack the anatomical nuances provided by physicality to become astronomers. Also, the whole communicating without speaking thing would make it difficult to communicate unless they learned to write in another language,'
Angels lack physical bodies, therefore they somehow can't observe... ignoring the fact that the lack of physical constraints would make observing the universe much easier... so I see no reason why an angel would be necessarily unable to be an astronomer.
I studied Aquinas. You, sir, are no Aquinas...
White Man said:I never even thought of it that way. That's kind of cheating though, isn't it? I mean, being able to observe the entire universe since the beginning of time with no restrictions kind of pisses on all the discoveries and advances we mere humans have made. I would not consider this 'angelic astronomy' to be true astronomy since it's the very limits of our human existence that makes the stars so attractive in the first place. Since angels, higher entities, would be on a higher level of existence, they're observing of our cosmos would be a mere overlapping of our individual realities. It's like me walking into a first grade class and whipping some 7 year old's ass at addition. . .sure, it's technically math, but it's more like something from the theatre of the absurd. I'd be extremely out of my element, sniping a lower denoinator just to show them up.
Heh. I've got a B.A. in English Literature and Theology... it was a fun four years. Aquinas is one my favorite "old" philosophers, at the very least because he always approached things in a systematic and logical way. Even if you disbelieve everything he says, you at least KNOW what he says and why he says it... as opposed to the German philosophers. Grunt.White Man said:This is the coolest thread derail ever. Aquinas never fails when it comes to starting interesting conversations. I'm not even religious -- I just like the mixture of logic and metaphysics. A really intelligent student could probably argue for Aquinas' thoughts on angels being one of the first (if not the first) treatsies on open/closed systems and the interactions between the two.
Heh. I've got a B.A. in English Literature and Theology... it was a fun four years. Aquinas is one my favorite "old" philosophers, at the very least because he always approached things in a systematic and logical way. Even if you disbelieve everything he says, you at least KNOW what he says and why he says it... as opposed to the German philosophers. Grunt.
White Man said:I studied English Lit and Philosophy, and I take great offense to what you say about my beloved German philosophers. For the most part. Give me a good post-structuralist Frenchie any day of the week. I do agree with what you say about Aquinas. Even though I'm not religious, I find his ideas very interesting and clear. It's some of the best logic outside of the Greek masters. Now I kind of want to get my mom to ship me some more of my books, but I just got her to do a pretty big shipment the other week. Drats.
I prefer the Greeks and Aquinas because of their ability to better use reason and logic to prove or explain their points. My studies in the German philosophers were restricted to a single year, but I never found them to be as clear as the older folks... that, and I do find myself siding more with the basic beliefs and views of the Greeks and Aquinas than I do with the "modern" philosophers from the 1600-1800's.
Kaijima said:However, this typical Internet snark over appearance, etc, is lame beyond words, especially in the context of discussion over Mike/Gabe having a child with his wife.
It seems some people's need to elevate themselves by criticizing others knows no bounds, and has no concept of honor.
bobbyconover said:Yeah, but isn't PA completely based on "typical Internet snark" to begin with? Almost every strip reads exactly like a lame message-board stone being thrown at various members of the industry and other easy targets. Same with their written updates. And they do it all under the guise of these hip/attractive doodz-with-'tude who are, in fact, nothing like their scrawny and/or fat mega-nerd real-life counterparts. I'm sorry, but that IS kinda funny. If they weren't the targets, they'd probably think so too, and would likely bar no holds in pointing it out in one of their strips.
And you appear to be a thoughtless cunt.Go Go Ackman! said:God some of you people are crybabies.
Nope, sorry. Only during death or tragedy. Birth ain't gonna cut it.RevenantKioku said:you would expect some common fucking courtesy during times of birth/death.
Well you get excused because of your bounty of midgets in your anal cavity.border said:Nope, sorry. Only during death or tragedy. Birth ain't gonna cut it.
Penny-Arcade said:I showed up at the waiting room with an Xbox and a PS2, just to be certain. Everyone has seen the ridiculous movies and television programs where harried, powerless men rush madly about, and I determined that this was precisely the type of bullshit that wasn't going down on my watch. We played Burnout 3 from eleven in the afternoon until nine o'clock at night, intermittently comforting Gabe and being horrified at the workings of feminine machinery. Pork, Brad, and I set our minds on the acquisition of tremendous destruction bonuses in the crash mode, believing that if we could only amass fifty million dollars and gain access to the Semi, we would have done our part in the day's long exertions. Friends, it was not easy. but I am proud to say that we succeeded.