It's real look it up.HAHAHAHA Fuck that can't be real 😂😂😂
we get distracted easily sometimesCliff's family sees a butterfly:
https://twitter.com/Kaycon000/status/758137240971280384Bald pupper/sister: HAHAHAHA Fuck that can't be real 😂😂😂
Bald pupper/sister: HAHAHAHA Fuck that can't be real 😂😂😂
I wish I had time I would love to re-read the HP books. Also I wish my brain wasn't tainted with the piss-poor movie faces and locations. I can still see in my mind's eye how I imagined everything when I first read the books but it's all fading.
The Harry Potter movies are better than the books, and I've read the books five times.
Book purists can die in a fire.
Literally the only instance I can think of where the book is still superior is The Hobbit.
The movies suck, but what's wrong with their faces and locations? :3
Harry Potter is a charming story but it's not high literature. The movies are amazing.
here's a mouse twerking
Harry Potter is a charming story but it's not high literature. The movies are amazing.
here's a mouse twerking
Alot of them are okay, especially locations can be good, but most of the characters are just stupid looking. I can't stand Harry. He's so ugly and can act as good as a potato.
They're not high literature, but they're better than those mediocre movies.
Alot of them are okay, especially locations can be good, but most of the characters are just stupid looking. I can't stand Harry. He's so ugly and can act as good as a potato.
Übermatik;211738995 said:Not hard. The Hobbit movies were pants.
Daniel Radcliffe having a highly prolific career post Potter is proof that you're wrong
"ugly"
So you think that they're mediocre despite being adored by hundreds of millions and consistently making box office records?
wait, really?Literally the only instance I can think of where the book is still superior is The Hobbit.
Daniel Radcliffe having a highly prolific career post Potter is proof that you're wrong
Yes. See above.
Trojita once again up to no good, started making trouble in that neighbourhood.