BuddyChrist83 said:was it weighing down on your soul so much that you had to bump a thread that's almost three weeks old?
does it really matter? maybe the topic interested him. what a concept. not everyone lives on the first page.
BuddyChrist83 said:was it weighing down on your soul so much that you had to bump a thread that's almost three weeks old?
StrikerObi said:
Analysts know shit.
neptunes said:who the fucked bumped this thread?
I agree with BuddyChrist, lock this up it's too old to even argue about.
not to mention it's still speculation.
HalfPastNoon said:why do people still think that the IBL, IBB shit is funny? analysts know shit? i wonder why they're paid the big bucks then...
It's more the fact that what I posted had to be said. .BuddyChrist83 said:was it weighing down on your soul so much that you had to bump a thread that's almost three weeks old?
neptunes said:3 weeks speculation?
DCharlie said:Newsflash! Kutarugi has already said repeatedly that Sony would never launch a primary system exceeding $300. *
* = outside Japan.
Serafitia said:I doubt it'll be that much, but if so, I'm not getting it on launch. Hm, PS2's the last Sony system that I bye on launch.
DCharlie said:Newsflash! Kutarugi has already said repeatedly that Sony would never launch a primary system exceeding $300. *
* = outside Japan.
Nicco said:This is an analyst. Analysts are based on facts. The fact is that Sony is spending 1.8 billion--with a 'b'--dollars on the Cell processor alone. The fact is that the PS3 will be backwards compatible with the PS2. The fact is that many non-gaming features will be installed on the PS3. The fact is that the PS3 will utilize cutting edge blu-ray technology. The fact is that Sony has the audacity to release the PSX stateside for $700.
Knowing all this is it entirely out of logic to suggest that the PS3 will be $500?
boutrosinit said:*joins the queue*
Btw, there's two models of PS3 planned apparently - one PSX-style model with a million and one tech-whore features and another that's a bit more bare bones. The bare bones one is probably more likely to hit for $300 since it's doubtful it'll have a Blu-Ray Burner on it. Of course, I'm speculating.
This is an analyst. Analysts are based on facts. The fact is that Sony is spending 1.8 billion--with a 'b'--dollars on the Cell processor alone. The fact is that the PS3 will be backwards compatible with the PS2. The fact is that many non-gaming features will be installed on the PS3. The fact is that the PS3 will utilize cutting edge blu-ray technology. The fact is that Sony has the audacity to release the PSX stateside for $700.
---- said:PS2 was $380 when it launched in Japan in March of 2000. I remember how everyone made a big deal about that and used it as a reason why the Dreamcast which had just been released on 9/9/99 for $199 was going to kick it's ass. Yeah.
Nicco said:This is an analyst. Analysts are based on facts. The fact is that Sony is spending 1.8 billion--with a 'b'--dollars on the Cell processor alone. The fact is that the PS3 will be backwards compatible with the PS2. The fact is that many non-gaming features will be installed on the PS3. The fact is that the PS3 will utilize cutting edge blu-ray technology. The fact is that Sony has the audacity to release the PSX stateside for $700.
Knowing all this is it entirely out of logic to suggest that the PS3 will be $500?
Gunstar77 said:Well $249 for PSP sound about what I figured but PS3 at $500 is very high. I doubt that PS3 would release at that price but if it did I would most likely still buy it, I wouldn't be able to get Xbox 2 though.
By the same token, doesn't it exceed logic to release a portable "gaming" over $200? Is that only for "tech people" too?SolidSnakex said:The fact is the PSX wasn't one of Sony's "gaming" systems as they've stated a million times. It was for tech people...
See, here is the logic that needs to die. This whole "they're not that dumb" complex. Even with Sony launching the PSX for $700 and launching a portable console for (likely) over $200. And let's not forget all the other points I mentioned already--in particular the 1.8 billion--with a 'b'--dollars being invested in the Cell.kevm3 said:It's not going to cost $500 dollars when it launches in the US. Sony didn't get to the top and stay there for two generations by being stupid. They're not dumb enough to launch a console at half a grand while the x-box 2 is $300 or so.
Nicco said:By the same token, doesn't it exceed logic to release a portable "gaming" over $200? Is that only for "tech people" too?