ConcealedBlaze
Member
That's not even remotely what I said. Just because you got a raise doesn't mean there isn't illegal discrimination going on where a protected class is being discriminated against and paid less strictly on the basis of their belonging to that class.H
In other Words you cant make a case of this, just claim something is ilegal and thats it
Thats why i say before, she cant make this case unless she was the only women Who Dont have a Raise, and that Dont happen
It's also not the only issue raised in the lawsuit. They are also alleging retaliation (as directly reported to her by her managers) for discussing inequality in wages which from my understanding is illegal in California (I'm also not a California attorney, by the way).
I'm not saying the plaintiffs will win or have a good lawsuit. My point was none of us know the facts at issue here other than what the plaintiffs are alleging in their suit.
But people insist that the case should come out the way that matches their biases without 1) knowing the facts or 2) understanding the laws at issue. Again, GAF just swings a certain way so it seems like I'm taking a side when I'm not. Just trying to encourage critical thought (which is probably a losing battle online).