Seriously?
Glad trump is too stupid to take advantage of a softball.
Seriously?
Bernie and i agree on these issues, Bernie voters will vote for me
Bernie is just awful, awful. Also, still vote for me?
You know what, though? Trump is at least immediately talking about it and putting forth a message. Hillary and the democrats don't do that as well. They need to.
You know what, though? Trump is at least immediately talking about it and putting forth a message. Hillary and the democrats don't do that as well. They need to.
Shit, that's a great adTrump SuperPAC ad:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_5Qowo2j84
Certainly better than the 3 a.m. ad that Priorities USA put out.
You know what, though? Trump is at least immediately talking about it and putting forth a message. Hillary and the democrats don't do that as well. They need to.
You know what, though? Trump is at least immediately talking about it and putting forth a message. Hillary and the democrats don't do that as well. They need to.
Geeze. What is with CNN parading out all of these Trump supporters both last week and tonight?
So let me get this straight...
We are gonna give this country over to this fucking disgusting human being over some goddamn emails?
Seriously?
‏ @realDonaldTrump
The @CNN panels are so one sided, almost all against Trump. @FoxNews is so much better and the ratings are much higher. Don't watch CNN!
This is not a message. This is the ranting of a drunk person who wrestled their phone away from his handlers.
The Democrats handled this just about as well as we could. We had POTUS, Clinton, Bernie, DWS, the DNC all issue statements in support of what happened.
Rambling on Twitter is not a response.
This is a guy who didn't put out any messaging for hours about his VP pick, or Hillary's!
He has like 2 surrogates to push his message, other than Twitter.
Jesus people.
what the fuck are you talking about
trump is literally responding to the democratic statements
Are we really worried about Trump and his series of tweets?
It was a joke, everyone. I had something similar about democrats earlier but was joking here because the subject doesn't mean anything. Sorry--should have better indicated my sarcasm.
This situation means almost nothing. Nobody will be talking about it after the convention.
Everyone is on edge because the american left is the worst.
Looks like Flordia, Virginia, NC, Ohio, and Nevada are the important states.
Looks like Flordia, Virginia, NC, Ohio, and Nevada are the important states.
- Every four years, do a mail-in survey of the American people similar to a census to gauge political leanings and categorize the equivalent of temporary parties accordingly. The number of parties for the election will be determined by the amount of overlap between categories on the issues.
- After party options have been categorized, citizens will be notified of their options (and will be sent results of which party they're most closely aligned with if they participated in the census)
- Have the electoral college accommodate for the amount of candidates that will run in the general election based on the amount of parties involved
- Distribute a level of power in the executive branch that reflects the amount of support each candidate received in the general election; all candidates will become executive officers and their votes will be weighted according to the support they received from their constituents
I'm not going to draft up a whole new constitution for you in this post, but a new constitution is what we would need in order to pull this off.
What we have now is not satisfactory and just because we have an option that is less shit than another option, it doesn't mean that not choosing either shitty option makes a citizen personally responsible for the shitty things that happen to this country.
I think between the demographics Florida, and Kasich fucking over Trump in Ohio, I think it's all a done deal.
I'm still curious as to the actual expected demographics. Is the amount of Hispanic likely voters expected to rise compared to 2012? If so, how much? Are the current polls using that information? I haven't seen that info anywhere.
I'm still curious as to the actual expected demographics. Is the amount of Hispanic likely voters expected to rise compared to 2012? If so, how much? Are the current polls using that information? I haven't seen that info anywhere.
Tons of folks have moved from Puerto Rico to Florida due to the current economic situation in Puerto Rico.
Everyone is on edge because the american left is the worst.
I'm still curious as to the actual expected demographics. Is the amount of Hispanic likely voters expected to rise compared to 2012? If so, how much? Are the current polls using that information? I haven't seen that info anywhere.
Among all Floridians, registered Democrats outnumber Republicans in 2016. This is due in part to Hispanics, who accounted for 88% of growth in the number of registered Democrats between 2006 and 2016. During this time, the number of Hispanic registered voters increased by 61%, while the number of Hispanics identifying as Democrats increased by 83% and those having no party affiliation increased by 95%. The number of Hispanic Republican registered voters has grown too but much more slowly (just 16%). As a result, among Hispanic registered voters in 2016, 678,000 were registered as Democrats, 610,000 indicated no party affiliation and 479,000 were registered as Republicans. (Its worth noting that not all registered voters cast a ballot, and voter turnout has a large impact in swing states like Florida.)
However, in Miami-Dade County home to 46% of the nations Cuban-American population Republicans still outnumber Democrats among Hispanic registered voters. In 2016, there were 260,000 Republicans and 213,000 Democrats, both decreases of about 5,000 from 2014. But even in this Cuban stronghold, statewide trends hold true. Among Hispanic registered voters between 2006 and 2016, the number of Democrats increased 62% while the number of Republican registered voters was flat.
I feel like all this postulating about fairness, but not one person ever questioned if the process of selecting a presidential nominee is fair to women or to minorities. A woman wins and suddenly there's loads of complaints about how the system is rigged. When has a political system ever been rigged for a woman or minority? What about fairness to women or minorities who have had all the disadvantages that being female or minority has awarded them in public life and politics?Oh, so you're arguing that it's not unfair to Sanders to advantage Clinton because Clinton is more personally deserving? I think the response goes similarly - the important kind of fairness here is not fairness to candidates but fairness to voters who support candidates. I expect that many Sanders supporters would eventually get here even if it's not where they start out. The idea would be that it is not fair to Sanders' supporters, who are largely members of the Democratic coalition and will vote for the Democratic nominee, etc., to disadvantage their choice just because Clinton is more personally deserving (obviously they would probably dispute this and say that she's not more personally deserving on account of being super-corrupt).
I don't really think so.Is there even a chance Hillary loses Virginia?
After the amounts of shit you gave me for theorycrafting representatives by sortition... shucks, brainchild. You made a doozy.
It's tantamount to an oligarchy as others have already pointed out, and in times of war or crisis, the executive branch will be paralyzed or self-defeating when inevitable factions form around choice of response and strategy.
have you seen the things the british and brazilian left are up to as of late?
Do you have numbers or information on their likelihood of voting?
What does @Reince think about Trump's JFK conspiracy theory? "He's got a right to talk about whatever he wants to talk about."
I don't have the numbers on the likelihood of voting, but I do know that it's 31% Cubans and 27% Puerto Ricans in terms of the Hispanic vote in Florida. I also know that Puerto Ricans lean Democrat while Cubans lean Republicans. I'll see if I can pull up some numbers.
My god, get a SIMPLE message and run with it.
"The treatment of Bernie and his supporters shows that politics is rigged. That's why we need an outsider to bring about change!"
There done. Pin that shit and STFU.
God, he's so fucking stupid.
also that the cuban lean is decidedly less pronounced than it once was while the rican lean is as strong as ever
The crazy thing about Florida is that with Puerto Rico in shambles it might just be that Puerto Ricans doom the Republican party. More and more Puerto Ricans are leaving the island every day. The situation out there is grim from what all my family is saying, and friends are telling me. Republicans used to just be able to rely on the Cuban vote to help carry Florida, and pretty soon that may not be the case anymore. If Florida flips blue Republicans are doomed. Shit is crazy to think about as a man who is Puerto Rican.
They did the same thing after Barry. I think the love will wear off quicker and i might be liable to get 'yelling old guy' on my national record.word up.
Prepare for the emails to start asking for more money and getting calls from "Unknown" asking for money
I'm glad I donated, but I could do without the phone calls lol
It is obvious that I should have done a better job at explaining how the selection of parties would work because for some reason people got the impression that the government would be responsible for making up the parties, which is not at all what I meant to convey in my proposal.
Anyway, maybe one of these days when I'm super bored I'll draft up a constitution outline that clarifies my ideas. For now, you can just ignore it.
I'm still curious as to the actual expected demographics. Is the amount of Hispanic likely voters expected to rise compared to 2012? If so, how much? Are the current polls using that information? I haven't seen that info anywhere.