mamacint said:
Possibly, but she's so green she's pretty much a blank slate. We'll see how things work out. Apart from that trooper-in-law stuff, she sounds alright.
The big strength of getting someone so fresh to GOP politics and from such remote place is that she hasn't had a chance to build up the unavoidable dirt that would be unescapable in the modern Republican party.
Don't get me wrong. I actually think she's alright. I think that while I disagree with her on pretty much everything when it comes to social values she looks like a genuinely competent governor of a small state with integrity and charm.
But that's not enough because John McCain is not Barack Obama. John McCain doesn't know much about the economy and he picks a VP whose economic experience is running a state with less than a million people in it? John McCain is sometimes reckless in his foreign views and instead of picking someone more moderate that could reassure the electorate he picks someone who does not even have foreign policy views? John McCain enjoys the image of being a maverick, he has some independant and moderate appeal, he picks a social conservative?
John McCain has a million flaws and the only thing Sarah Palin brings to the ticket is charm. Her disturbing lack of experience makes her a liability to her ticket as democrats drill into the mind of voters that McCain is
old and that they will be taking the risk of giving her the reins of this country by voting for McCain. You can't run on a platform of experience and attack your opponent about it when you pick Sarah Palin. And that was pretty much the only way McCain could defeat Obama, by being the safe choice.
Sarah Palin in 2012 with 4 years on the national stage and 6 years of experience as a governor might end up being a fearsome candidate running against Barrack Obama if she doesn't end up Ferraro'd, but it's far too soon for her to run. It'd be like if Obama had been selected by Kerry in 2004.