With less than a week to go before Iowa, the GOP's blame game has already begun
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...o-let-trump-get-this-far-218260#ixzz3yPC9PQSB
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...o-let-trump-get-this-far-218260#ixzz3yPC9PQSB
With time running out until the first primary votes are cast, establishment Republicans have begun a ferocious round of finger-pointing over who is to blame for the partys failure to stop Donald Trump.
The chiding, once limited to private conversations, is now erupting in public view with campaigns, operatives, donors, party officials, and conservative intellectuals arguing over why something hasnt been done to stop the man who has been leading nearly every state and national poll since August. Trump, many in the GOPs upper ranks are convinced, would lead the Republican Party to an epic defeat in November, with consequences all the way down the ballot.
This whole thing is a disaster, said Curt Anderson, a former Republican National Committee political director and veteran operative. I think Ill write a book about it.
Receiving much of the blame is Right to Rise, the cash-flush super PAC that broke records when it announced last year that it had raised more than $100 million in support of Jeb Bush. The group has directed relatively little of that sum toward attacking Trump instead focusing its efforts on taking down Bushs establishment rivals, above all Marco Rubio. To date, the group has spent around $5 million on TV commercials going after Trump, while dropping four times as much in negative ads against Rubio. The latest spot, which came Tuesday, hammered Rubio over his messy financial history.
Yet others say its unfair to solely blame Bush and that Rubio is just as culpable. Despite winning the support of an array of deep-pocketed donors, including hedge fund manager Paul Singer and tech titan Larry Ellison, Rubio has and his allies have done little to attack Trump. Of the $33 million that Rubio and the super PACs supporting him have spent on television ads, none of it has been against Trump. He rarely tweets about Trump, and when asked about him in interviews, Rubio tends to dodge the question.
There are worries among top Republicans, too, that the RNC is abandoning its post-2012 "autopsy," which urged the GOP to reach out to minority groups or risk decades in the political wilderness.
Sally Bradshaw, a longtime top Bush adviser who helped write the report, blamed a "lack of courage in our party" for the failure to take on Trump, as Bush has. She called Trump a bigot and said he couldnt unite our party and bring women, Hispanics, and independent voters into the fold.
We wont beat Hillary Clinton with Donald Trump as the nominee, she added. It doesnt take a whiz-bang political data scientist to figure that out."
In some instances, anger has begun boil to over. Earlier this month, during the RNCs winter meeting, Holland Redfield, a party committeeman from the Virgin Islands, rose during a private breakfast to vent to Priebus about Trump. During the impromptu speech, Redfield complained of the pressures to not speak out, saying that, Were almost terrorized as members of our party.
In an interview, Redfield said that other RNC members had privately applauded him since his speech became public. But he predicted that, if Trump becomes the nominee, the party would face an intense battle between those who were going along with his candidacy and those who arent.
It will be a major internal fight, he said. I feel the party has been hijacked.