"He was complaining about how some games journalists were advertising a game on Twitter in order to win a PS3. Seeing someone post this, who is part of a website that took cash of one of the big 3 players in the console space to fund a documentary is, to put it bluntly, pathetic."
So, wait, we're supposed to believe both the meme that Microsoft is a bunch of divisons shooting at each other via internal feuds (see xkcd post and also any story about Microsoft on the Internet in the pasr decade) and that the Internet Explorer and XBox divisions conspired to pay off _one_ web site, especially as posted previously, XBox 360 games also rank below the Metacritic above.
I mean, I get it. Arthur Gies is worse than cancer. But, would you believe that for instance, Kotaku was biased, if Sony's TV Division sponsored them for a month?