What does that mean, exactly?Opus Angelorum said:Great hardware marred with an inconsistent interface, needs rethinking.
What does that mean, exactly?Opus Angelorum said:Great hardware marred with an inconsistent interface, needs rethinking.
I don't think iOS and Vita's OS are going to prioritize applications in the same way, though. I would be really disappointed in Sony if they gave more than 128mb of RAM to background processes.Nuclear Muffin said:The browser is as fully featured as Safari on iOS and you have the other apps running in the background at the same time as well. Seems plausible to me.
The PS Vita system's web browser is the perfect place to enjoy the internet. Surf the net, browse your favourite pages and type using the touch screen keyboard on the stunning 5 inch OLED screen. Pinch to zoom is supported. You can also open up to 8 windows. It can also be used while in a game.
It's already there. Hidden, but there.thuway said:You need to include a link to the prototype Remote Play functionality with Killzone 3. It is my most hyped feature. If GAF hasn't seen this, please do http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHNn12SHiTQ&hd=1
You can do that with the 3DS as well...but the low resolution and lack of multitouch makes it a bit cumbersome to use.weekend_warrior said:Game changer.
I just want that official Minecraft port on Xperia for Vita!kaysee said:PS suite will really open up the system.
Yeah, that browser is absolutely terrible.chubigans said:You can do that with the 3DS as well...but the low resolution and lack of multitouch makes it a bit cumbersome to use.
Thanks, I was going to put them in, but it was already so picture heavy. But I think I'll add them, just because its interesting to see as well.chubigans said:Here's some facebook/foursquare app screenshots for the OP if you want em:
http://www.akshayproductions.com/bl...ike-on-the-playstation-vita-456#axzz1YF6sZRtH
Unconfirmed, and probably unlikely imo. Seems much of a personal device than a home console.Goldrusher said:The most important question remains unanswered...
Can we have multiple user profiles on the thing ?
Do you have a link of the video? And at what time does it occur? I can always add it to the page.Jinfash said:Great work Bad_Boy, although I'd love it if someone can help you out with the 3 seconds of notification center footage that was wedged in the OS trailer (not demonstration) at the start of the conference. I thought it looked interesting, and I believe it hasn't been covered/screen'd yet.
This is my big thing about it too. I think from our point of view, people who havent used it yet, will be a bit taken back at how everything is jumbled together. But I think it'll make much more sense in our hands.gofreak said:Regarding aesthetics...it's helpful to bear in mind that everything outside of the base OS is in its own app - so the designers of each app has some creative freedom in determining their own look. Some interface widgets are standard though, like the back and options buttons.
The whole thing seems to be built around 'apps' and running them in parallel. I'd say the resource allocation for the game execution space and the app execution space is fixed by the way...closing apps in the background probably just frees space for other apps, not the game. I think it's basically like it's running two devices in parallel - a single core + xxxMB RAM device for apps and a tri-core/xxxMB device for games, both very separate.
The look and feel of the OS is all over the place. It may (functionally) be the best thing since sliced bread, which it seems to be, but it's visually inconsistent and looks like a bad cell phone OS. Polar opposite of the XMB. Not a huge deal, but it's objectively poor visual design. Which is bizarre coming from Sony, who usually is great with visual language.chubigans said:What does that mean, exactly?
chubigans said:What does that mean, exactly?
ctrayne said:The look and feel of the OS is all over the place. It may (functionally) be the best thing since sliced bread, which it seems to be, but it's visually inconsistent and looks like a bad cell phone OS. Polar opposite of the XMB. Not a huge deal, but it's objectively poor visual design. Which is bizarre coming from Sony, who usually is great with visual language.
That's true, but then again the PS3 is an example of a visually consistent interface across all apps- and it's sterile and boring.Opus Angelorum said:There is a lack of cohesion across the interface, mainly because they allow each element to have its own design.
chubigans said:That's true, but then again the PS3 is an example of a visually consistent interface across all apps- and it's sterile and boring.
Oh, I think the XMB is great. It may be "sterile" but it flows very well. I was hoping for an evolution of that, not a complete 180. I'm not worked up over it or anything. It's just surprisingly "Web 2.0" in a bad way. Seems to lack some of the basic elements of good design.chubigans said:That's true, but then again the PS3 is an example of a visually consistent interface across all apps- and it's sterile and boring.
Colorful and less intimidating means they're probably targeting a younger audience. It's good for sales.Opus Angelorum said:I guess my point is that it's unlike Sony to design an OS like this, and I don't think it works (from what I've seen).
There's flash on PS3, there's limited flash on PSP, it'll definitely be on the Vita methinks.-Pyromaniac- said:Also since when does no flash support mean no youtube support, lol.
I'm just saying, I can go on youtube.com on my ipad now and it works perfectly with no flash support. They have an HTML5 site as well I believe.chubigans said:There's flash on PS3, there's limited flash on PSP, it'll definitely be on the Vita methinks.
I hope they make a Youtube app that launches upon hitting a youtube link. Works awesome on my iTouch.-Pyromaniac- said:I'm just saying, I can go on youtube.com on my ipad now and it works perfectly with no flash support. They have an HTML5 site as well I believe.
Do not understand...?Bad_Boy said:It's already there. Hidden, but there.![]()
There is a link to the killzone remote play function, click the text under the remote play section.thuway said:Do not understand...?
Well they said the Vita browser is based off Webkit. so I guess most HTML5 websites should work.-Pyromaniac- said:I'm just saying, I can go on youtube.com on my ipad now and it works perfectly with no flash support. They have an HTML5 site as well I believe.
Sure, gimme some time.Bad_Boy said:Do you have a link of the video? And at what time does it occur? I can always add it to the page.
That's would be a big fuck you to all the PS3-gamers who are used to the current system.Bad_Boy said:Unconfirmed, and probably unlikely imo. Seems much of a personal device than a home console.
Buy physical games and share it?Goldrusher said:And call it piracy, but what if you do buy multiple Vita's for your kids... Wouldn't it be nice if parents could use 1 account to buy games with, which all 3 kids can use on their Vita ?
Goldrusher said:That's would be a big fuck you to all the PS3-gamers who are used to the current system.
I buy games from every region and would like to continue doing so with the Vita.
And what if you have multiple kids. Plural. They won't be able to easily switch profiles and use their own saves, friends and unlock trophies.
And call it piracy, but what if you do buy multiple Vita's for your kids... Wouldn't it be nice if parents could use 1 account to buy games with, which all 3 kids can use on their Vita ?
I think the idea is to have multiple Vita's. Being a personal device. Expensive yes, and it sucks. But multiple PS3's sounds so much worse.Goldrusher said:That's would be a big fuck you to all the PS3-gamers who are used to the current system.
I buy games from every region and would like to continue doing so with the Vita.
And what if you have multiple kids. Plural. They won't be able to easily switch profiles and use their own saves, friends and unlock trophies.
This would actually be pretty smart. Though doubtful.Goldrusher said:And call it piracy, but what if you do buy multiple Vita's for your kids... Wouldn't it be nice if parents could use 1 account to buy games with, which all 3 kids can use on their Vita ?