seanoff said:quick economics lesson folks. Doing eco in my masters in case u r wondering.
Sometimes it's better to sell goods in a bundle because it allows you to maximize the take from the consumer as well as being more efficient and reducing your costs.
Simply, u can get the consumer to buy stuff they don't necessarily want but must get in the bundle.
Most of that bundle bar the actual device itself probably doesn't cost Sony a whole lot of money. My guess is somewhere in the range of $10 - $20 total.
So even if they charge $200 for a PSP only and are losing say $50 on the PSP (cost to Sony $250) itself they might get some back by charging $25 for stuff that only costs them $10. Net loss = $35.
But some of that loss can be offset against the fact they don't have to ship, warehouse, sell etc some of the other goods in the bundle.
So, if this is the price, the economics of that price may surprise u. This report may help
http://www.accenture.com/xd/xd.asp?it=enweb&xd=_ins\researchreportabstract_193.xml
boutrosinit said:Also PSP will definitely *not* be out this year.
Midas said:According to?
Sometimes it's better to sell goods in a bundle because it allows you to maximize the take from the consumer as well as being more efficient and reducing your costs.
AniHawk said:That's one helluva battery life.
cybamerc said:With all due respect I don't think you know the manufacturing costs of these items.
boutrosinit said:People who are actually working on the fucking thing
Elios83 said:I think that people claiming the PSP costs Sony 250/300 or more dollars are totally overstimating the situation.PSP is made exclusively with Sony technology,a few of these techs are even used in other Sony products (audio),plus there's not a huge R&D behind the hardware itself as it's the case of a new console (PS2,PS3 etc) a lot of things are recylcled from other products even the PSX for the interface.Sony developed PSP in 18 months they said.The only thing that Sony does not control and could impact the price of the console is the screen provided by Sharp (or Samsung?) but here we're talking about a contract for all the PSP lyfe and for millions of parts.With this kind of contracts manufacturers make special prices for the single unit knowing they can offset the low margin with the quantities and duration of the deal.So I don't really think that Sony will lose that much money if at all on the PSP even at a 199$ price point.
mrklaw said:I find it odd for them to bundle a slip cover and cleaners - ideal accessory sales (either from Sony or accessory licensees). Also if you need a memory stick to save games then sell one. And remote control? I know it multifunction, but for PS2 you bought the DVD remote separately. You could do the same for mp3. Or maybe you need the remote for playback, and they'll sell an LCD remote for extra later on (I'd buy one
Panajev2001a said:The price estimates I hear on the unit are around $350 per unit.
So at that price they would have a loss, but not the $250-300 kind of loss per unit that people fear.
The same thing could've been said for the original Playstation, though -- the popular consoles that preceeded it didn't require extra hardware for saving, but that didn't make Sony pack a memory card in the box. The opportunity for additional profits is too great.Insertia said:Packaging the memory stick is a necessity. There has to be a way to save game data without having to buy a peripheral. That's the way it's been with pretty much every handheld in the past, and Sony would be asking for too much if they expect consumers to buy something that's standard in handhelds.
Y'know, PS1 was the first mass market console to force one into buying a memory card to save games... In fact your whole paragraph could be reflected back to 1994...Insertia said:Packaging the memory stick is a necessity. There has to be a way to save game data without having to buy a peripheral. That's the way it's been with pretty much every handheld in the past, and Sony would be asking for too much if they expect consumers to buy something that's standard in handhelds. As I said before, it's the same as Sony bundling a controller with every PS2.
JackFrost2012 said:It's worth pointing out that if the PSP costs $350 to make and Sony sells it for $250, they are losing more than $100 per unit what with shipping, retailer margins, etc. Small, yes, but.
It would probably have been higher if not for the somewhat surprisingly low DS price.
SCE engineers? 1st party dev teams? 3rd party devs? All or some of the above?boutrosinit said:People who are actually working on the fucking thing
How many other touch screen, microphone, WiFi enabled devices can you buy for $149? DS isn't exactly a GBA level ripoff considering the technology in it... Nintendo's likely not making the 50-70% margins they're used to with GB.sohka88 said:You think the DS price is low for what they are giving you?
1337 spong sources that are never named.SCE engineers? 1st party dev teams? 3rd party devs? All or some of the above?
jarrod said:Y'know, PS1 was the first mass market console to force one into buying a memory card to save games... In fact your whole paragraph could be reflected back to 1994...
Packaging the memory card is a necessity. There has to be a way to save game data without having to buy a peripheral. That's the way it's been with pretty much every console in the past, and Sony would be asking for too much if they expect consumers to buy something that's standard in consoles. I said before, it's the same as Nintendo bundling a controller with every SNES.
I was requoting Insertia's statement, changing things around to reflect PS1 rather than PSP. Yes I'm aware that PS1 set the standard of mandatory memory card sales.Dsal said:Uh... PS2,GC,DC... all also didn't include saving devices. They were all banking on making extra money from them.
Sony hasn't ever packaged a mem card with any retail console bundle that I can remember. Why would they start now?
Maybe because PSP isn't a console rather a portable handheld device?Dsal said:Sony hasn't ever packaged a mem card with any retail console bundle that I can remember. Why would they start now?
Seems like only the date was wrong. Consider me broke... hope there's no (good) games scheduled for the first half of 2005.john tv said:Any new info regarding the credibility of this rumor, Jonny?
Sorry, but I had to mention itboutrosinit said:That list is absolute bollocks.
That's all I'm saying.
Also PSP will definitely *not* be out this year.
Defensor said:Maybe because PSP isn't a console rather a portable handheld device?
boutrosinit said:People who are actually working on the fucking thing
john tv said:boutrowned!!