DarienA said:She was 96... King Kong 1933.... exactly 5 of us in this forum have seen the 1933 version of King Kong right?
No none of us were alive back then smart asses....
Ditto.Ignatz Mouse said:Wow, I had no idea she was still alive (until now). Holy cow.
I've seen it, by the way-- never saw any other versions.
Diablos said:Why do asian people live so much longer?
Must be all the rice and no meats.
Dr. Frank-N-Furter said:Whatever happened to Fay Wray
That delicate satin draped frame
As it clung to her thigh
How I started to cry
Cause I wanted to be dressed just the same
aparisi2274 said:Classic movie. The 1933 version in my world is the only version of King Kong that exists. Not that shit ass remake in 76, or the sequel in 86 with Linda Hamilton, KIng Kong Lives. I just hope that Jackson's vision will be true to the original.
ManaByte said:Oh, it will be. He's setting it in the 30's. Jackson himself has said how crappy the 1976 version was.
aparisi2274 said:Yeah well my first issue with his remake is that he is filming it entirely in NZ. Yet, 1/3 of the movie is in NYC. I mean I would he would film some shots here in NY with the actors at the top of the ESB or some other places, just to keep the story in check with the original.
SteveMeister said:But New York is sooooo very different from the way it was in the 1930's. They'd have to do a lot of serious CGI & set work to get the skyline, streets & buildings right that they might as well not do it on location.
DarienA said:#1. Nope not on DVD yet.
You're so clever.Diablos said:Asians, Canadians. Whatever.![]()