Does it run at 60fps? That's a deal breaker for me.Kuran said:No excuse though. It should at least run at 60fps, and be budget-priced.
Gwanatu T said:Does it run at 60fps? That's a deal breaker for me.
You refuse to buy Rayman 3D because it's technically flawed, but you want to buy Ridge Racer 3D even though it looks sub-par as well(the stable framerate is literally the only good thing about RR)?Amir0x said:i dunno I guess I'm sticking to Ridge Racer begrudgingly. I've got no choice at this point :<
Pandoracell said:
StickSoldier said:I don't really see any reason for Amirox to buy it since you can buy other versions for much cheaper that are non 3D, and seeing as one of the main points about this version is that it's 3D (which everyone knows he doesn't like), its understandable that he won't buy it if the games not a perfect port of the DC version. I believe that other people though, who want to play it in 3D and experience something new with the game should give it a shot if the reviews aren't bad. SSF4 has its faults, like running only 30 fps in 3D and static backgrounds, but it's still fun from what everyone says, so I don't see why Rayman should be disliked solely because of a few drops in frame rate. As long as the game is fun is all that matters really, and it seems like it is from the people who played it.
Amir0x said:seriously it's an amazing game. If it only has SOME slow down, it might still definitely be worth it for first time players.
It's a top 50 game.
Amir0x said:sigh
Rayman 3D
i dunno I guess I'm sticking to Ridge Racer begrudgingly. I've got no choice at this point :<
Boney said:So rayman 2 is good.
Maybe I should get this?
SalsaShark said:This has to be the most ported game ever (not counting fighters i guess), what the fuck.
AceBandage said:Seriously.
They should have replaced this is Origins.
Would have made a great launch title.
SalsaShark said:This has to be the most ported game ever (not counting fighters i guess), what the fuck.
There's also Lego Star Wars but I can understand not including it if you're not a fan.Ramenman said:It's like, the only action/adventure game on day one.
Such a requirement doesn't apply to all games, you know. There is no excuse for this game in particular to run at anything less. The 12 year old Dreamcast ran this game at a perfect 60 fps, so why shouldn't a brand new 2011 piece of hardware do the same? Anything less means a lazy ass port.Aru said:You are missing a lot of games then. 60fps games are pretty rare these days, except for fighters.
AniHawk said:there are nine versions of rayman 2: the great escape. the gbc rayman 2 was released around the same time, but is obviously not the same game. i think there are eleven different super street fighter ii games out there, which may be the most-ported game ever.
mclem said:Lemmings? Elite? Tetris?
"Rayman 3D isn't a simple port. We improved the game experience by adjusting the difficulty curve and the camera angles in the game. We also improved the game system and controls to provide all players with more accessibility. We polished the actors and level visuals thanks to the capabilities of the console. Finally, we made use of stereoscopy to create more immersion so that the player really feels like he or she is diving into Rayman's universe." - Abderrazzak Elkaouni
heringer said:
I don't usually use that kind of logic, simply because it's usually unrealistic. This, however, is different, simply because it's a port of a 12 year old game on to a console that is well more than capable to do such a thing, given the Dreamcast version, that this is based on, ran at a perfect 60fps. Anything less is unacceptable. That being said, it seems people are saying that it's 60 the vast majority of the time, and I think that's good enough for me. So my launch titles are now Pilotwings, Super Monkey Ball and Rayman. Excellent.Aru said:You are missing a lot of games then. 60fps games are pretty rare these days, except for fighters.
Lonely1 said:If I only ever played the N64 version. Is it worth to replay this version?
Matthew Castle said:Ubisoft held Rayman back so no one would see how crap it is, basically. Without spoiling the score, it's one of our lowest rated 3DS launch titles. Along with Splinter Cell and *shudders* Asphalt 3D. Ubisoft have only gone and blighted a Nintendo hardware launch with dodgy ports again.
Ha. Not surprised. On the plus side, he notably doesn't mention Ghost Recon, so there's still hope for that.Cow Mengde said:
Highest of fives, sir.V_Ben said:When I get a 3DS down the road, I will pick this game up for a tenner with it. The Precepice is still the best platforming level ever made. Absolutely wonderful.
If its anything like the Rayman 1 DSi port, difficulty has been thrown out the window.Peff said:I'm a bit concerned about these difficulty curve changes, though, given how "hard" Ubi games are usually like nowadays, but we'll find out how severe they are in a couple of days regardless.
Cow Mengde said:
FoneBone said:Ha. Not surprised. On the plus side, he notably doesn't mention Ghost Recon, so there's still hope for that.
And I'm out of here!Cow Mengde said:
NGamer staff writer (reviews editor) Matthew Castle"Ubisoft held Rayman back so no one would see how crap it is, basically. Without spoiling the score, it's one of our lowest rated 3DS launch titles. Along with Splinter Cell and *shudders* Asphalt 3D. Ubisoft have only gone and blighted a Nintendo hardware launch with dodgy ports again. Ghost Recon, however, is one of the better launch games. Kittsy's personal favourite, in fact. Check the blog tomorrow for some abridged opinions of all the launch games."