Wrote in the OT thread, but the more I think about it, the more I'm disappointed that Mike didn't go into Ghostbusters 2 at all, especially when he was comparing the 2016 reboot with the original. Mike really disliked Ghostbusters 2, and in a way, I think the review might have been stronger if he used it and the 2016 reboot to illustrate just how good the first movie is, and that no matter what, either doing a reboot which is a beat for beat recreation of the first movie, or the sequel which is a beat for beat recreation of the first movie, just doesn't work, and that maybe it was all lightning in a bottle that first time out.
Also, it would have been nice for him to tear into Ghostbusters 2 since most haven't heard their commentary, and it is still a loved film, despite having a ton of problems, like Last Crusade compared to Raiders.