Azelover
Titanic was called the Ship of Dreams, and it was. It really was.
okBut he's a Fallen Angel
okBut he's a Fallen Angel
The two of them were appointed as co-heads of Blizzard after shit went down the first time. Of course she should have been paid the same as the other, male co-head by a company who is literally trying their hardest to make some progressive moves in a desperate attempt to remedy their shitty culture.
He hasn't fallen!But he's an Angel
That sounds like the type of excuse the twitter crowd will use when it suits them, and reject when it inconveniences them. No thank you.You realise many working class people don't have the luxury of just leaving their kids without food on the table at a moment's notice, right? They may not have the buffer to go a month without their job. At the same time, they likely have friends who were personally impacted by these disgusting acts and want to prevent it happening to anyone else. It's not attention seeking ffs. They don't want to just ignore it and pass the buck.
Expecting your employer to investigate or act on rape allegations isn't being a drama queen.lol I swear i laugh every time I see employees walk out. It's become so common now they do it on a random Tuesday.
Go back to fucking work. Stop trying to get your bosses fired. Be happy you have a job during a pandemic when so many lost theirs.
An entire generation of drama queens.
Doubly so when you consider she had made it to a position where she would be able to actually affect some change.Hang on, scratch the surface of this and it seems, well...
I can't see the WSJ piece but looking at the Windows Central piece and what you get is:
So I had a quick look to see who Jen Oneal is and I got this article .
So, the male co-workers she she claims to be paid less than appear to be a total of 1 co-worker: Mike Ybarra, like the head of Blizzard and formerly CTO of Blizzard.
Not to dismiss all her claims, but its kinda funny to me that this oppressed, marginalized individual wasn't some mid-level staffer, but at the absolute top of the management hierarachy!
So what you are saying is if you were witness to a crime you would emigrate without complaint? After all if you truly didn't like what happened then the hassle, risk and pain should be entirely on you and the criminal should carry on unaffected? To do otherwise is attention seeking??Why don't they quit if they believe these allegations? I can't imagine staying at a company if I thought it actually condoned what you say was covered up. Anything less begs the question of are they sincere in their beliefs or looking for attention in my humble opinion.
Of course its serious, but whats up with the walking out all the time? Just do your job and if the guy did something illegal then hes gonna get fired or arrested or whatever. You stick to doing your job and focus on shipping games without bugs every year.
This whole WE DEMAND JUSTICE mentality is ridiculous. You are an employee of that firm. Do your fucking job. Imagine if everyone in the U.S federal govt started walking out because Trump and Biden were both accused of sexual harassment. No TSA. No police. No miltary. No teachers. When everyone starts walking out then nothing gets done.
THIS PARTFire his bitch ass. Period. He can't be allowed to stay on and run the company if any of that is true.
I don't know why anyone would be surprised the board is fine with this. Kotick is a shit human being but dude brought Activision up from bankruptcy to being the most profitable video game company in the world. He gets the board paid something fierce. If firing hundreds of employees after MAKING billions didn't bother them, nothing will.
Kotick is business, that's it. Gives no shit about employees, costumers or anything. He's there to make money and the board is all for that.
Where in your word salad do you explain how I am "beyond autistic" for having enough moral fiber that I would not work for a company if I thought it was covering up the rapes of my co-workers?So what you are saying is if you were witness to a crime you would emigrate without complaint? After all if you truly didn't like what happened then the hassle, risk and pain should be entirely on you and the criminal should carry on unaffected? To do otherwise is attention seeking??
There are such things as minimum standards of behaviour (which these managers get paid handsomely to enforce).
Some people here are showing their love of a videogame outweighs their morals or ability to empathise with humans. It is beyond autistic.
As if the Twitter crowd ever care for the working class.That sounds like the type of excuse the twitter crowd will use when it suits them, and reject when it inconveniences them. No thank you.
Sweden and the other Nordic countries have famously strong trade unions. This protects the employer.So true... These employees need to realise their bodies belong to the company. Whether that means working without safety gear to save the boss a buck or the odd bit of rapery for office girls.
Sack any fucker who walks out on principle.
Disloyal swines!
... this shit attitude is why everyone needs to join a trade union.
Expecting is one thing. Walking out and stopping work is another.Expecting your employer to investigate or act on rape allegations isn't being a drama queen.
I mean, lets think about this. When they fired those 800 employees, they made (in net not profit) $7.5 Billion. They could have easily gave each of those 800 employees $100,000 and barely felt the loss. There is nothing Kotick could do that would make the board give him up outside of him fucking with their bottom line.He could rape a chick on the boardroom table and they’d defend him, thanks to how much he makes for them. Let’s not kid ourselves of anything different.
You are saying workers should not exercise their right to withdraw their labour in response to their bosses putting colleagues at risk.Where in your word salad do you explain how I am "beyond autistic" for having enough moral fiber that I would not work for a company if I thought it was covering up the rapes of my co-workers?
Hey guys, if you could stop trying to get taken advantage of so this guy can play his Cawlodooties, that'd be great. Back to work now, because after all, why bother?Expecting is one thing. Walking out and stopping work is another.
He is being sued by the government of California. SEC is investigating him. What is walking out accomplishing here?
If the guy is guilty, he is gonna get fired or arrested. Plain and simple. All this nonsense about employees staging walkouts is for the cameras.
Why didnt they stage walkouts before this happened? How comes none of this shit about Activision come out before the State of California filed a lawsuit against Activision? None of these people went to Schrier who made a career out of reporting abuse. None of them went to the mainstream press when the whole MeToo movement exploded a few years ago. Werent they themselves complicit? Should I stage a walkout on neogaf because these guys didnt speak up when it mattered?
Again, walking out is the issue I have with this. If Kotick is guilty, by all means throw him in jail and lock away the key. You can go back and view the thread I made when this story first broke. I have no sympathy for these execs. What I dont care for is this nonsense walking outs. Go back to work. And do your job.
I am stupid and disgusting because I don't see a moral high ground by protesting while still taking money from a company that allegedly covers up rapes???????????????You are saying workers should not exercise their right to withdraw their labour in response to their bosses putting colleagues at risk.
Rape and harassment is not in the job description. It is against the law as the majority of people find such things reprehensible. They are morally right to oppose it. This is not virtue signalling, it is basic human decency.
You question their morals because they are not voluntarily increasing the pain of opposing these acts for the victims and their colleagues (who will already be losing pay during walkouts) by proposing they should permanently give up their income (and impact ability to feed families and make their mortgages) which is frankly as fucking stupid as it is disgusting. You are not being morally superior, you are going full retard.
I hope you are a teenager with no responsibility for others or life experience as you would at least have the chance to grow up.
Depends entirely how you exercise that strength. It can be a genuine benefit to companies to have unions (improved safety, collective bargaining), but the union mission is to protect employees above management or "the company".Sweden and the other Nordic countries have famously strong trade unions. This protects the employer.
It is stupid to expect that worker A leaving to be replaced by worker B will do anything but encourage the behaviour.I am stupid and disgusting because I don't see a moral high ground by protesting while still taking money from a company that allegedly covers up rapes???????????????
The two of them were appointed as co-heads of Blizzard after shit went down the first time. Of course she should have been paid the same as the other, male co-head by a company who is literally trying their hardest to make some progressive moves in a desperate attempt to remedy their shitty culture.
Enough with the hyperbole. I shared a benign opinion that you disagree with. That is not attacking people.You are stupid to expect that worker A leaving to be replaced by worker B will do anything but encourage the behaviour.
It is disgusting that you are attacking people who are doing the right thing by pretending there is a higher moral standard which involves workers and their families suffering more whilst the boss carries on making bank.
They do a good job protecting members and they are widespread, I'm a member myself and everyone I know are (60-70%). Toys 'R Us landed in some real hot water when they applied their non-negotiation policy in Sweden back in 1995. It's a classic and a fun read.Depends entirely how you exercise that strength. It can be a genuine benefit to companies to have unions (improved safety, collective bargaining), but the union mission is to protect employees above management or "the company".
Do they do a bad job or is there corruption / a lack of democracy to challenge such in Nordic unions? Are these unions widespread or mostly in the public sector? (Genuine interest).
Yep. Also, not all execs are paid the same. Not all managers are paid the same. Same goes for engineers and programmers. A senior software engineer with 20 years of experience is going to make a helluva lot more than a dude who just got the promotion a few months ago. Even if you look at salaries in glassdoors, the salaries have a curve. the Median is typically those who have been at that position for several years.I'm sorry, this reeks of an opportunistic powerplay. This woman supposedly climbed the ranks from the position of associate producer (which typically is one step above tester) to the joint leader of the company. Which (1) dents the argument of a glass ceiling in itself, and (2) if conditions were so horrible why didn't she flag it before now?
Exactly.I beg to differ. There's more to it than a title.
People get paid differently for doing the same job in business ALL THE TIME, and not because of sexism. A lot of it boils down to how hard you're willing to negotiate and what sort of track-record (both experience and remuneration-wise) you bring to the table to backup that negotiation.
I'm sorry, this reeks of an opportunistic powerplay. This woman supposedly climbed the ranks from the position of associate producer (which typically is one step above tester) to the joint leader of the company. Which (1) dents the argument of a glass ceiling in itself, and (2) if conditions were so horrible why didn't she flag it before now?
The amazing thing is Kotick makes around $200M/yr with most in stock options.They're standing by him for now, which tells me the overall Vanguard launch went pretty well.
All that matters to shareholders is money. Unless this creates new and disastrous liability, it won't matter.
Yeah sorry, being loyal to a company is just stupid. They don't give one shit about you, don't make the mistake of giving a shit about them.I don't care what he knew or not. But the fact that employees walk out and protest is fucking baffling to me.
In Sweden we have doctrine called 'lojalitetsplikt' (lit. "loyalty duty"). What it does is self explanatory; keep company secrets, don't besmirch your employer publicly etc.
I would fire anyone walking out on pure principle, even if I agree with them.
It's not like Kotick is going to be convicted and put in prison tomorrow.Expecting is one thing. Walking out and stopping work is another.
He is being sued by the government of California. SEC is investigating him. What is walking out accomplishing here?
If the guy is guilty, he is gonna get fired or arrested. Plain and simple. All this nonsense about employees staging walkouts is for the cameras.
Why didnt they stage walkouts before this happened? How comes none of this shit about Activision come out before the State of California filed a lawsuit against Activision? None of these people went to Schrier who made a career out of reporting abuse. None of them went to the mainstream press when the whole MeToo movement exploded a few years ago. Werent they themselves complicit? Should I stage a walkout on neogaf because these guys didnt speak up when it mattered?
Again, walking out is the issue I have with this. If Kotick is guilty, by all means throw him in jail and lock away the key. You can go back and view the thread I made when this story first broke. I have no sympathy for these execs. What I dont care for is this nonsense walking outs. Go back to work. And do your job.
I wonder how many of the walk outs do the same boycotting any companies selling shoes, jewelry, clothes, and food because the corporation use 75 cent/hour teenage labour in Cambodia. Or even at a higher end level, Apple and PC gear made at Foxconn where workers drone on forever making low pay and the company even had to install suicide nets below their balconies.Oh, look, turns out a CEO of a huge company is a complete asshole and a bad human being.
You usually don't become a CEO of a huge company just by being a good guy. Money and positions of power attract socio - and psychopaths with little or no moral integrity like shit attracts flies.
No. I prefer: you go to work and do my job.Go back to work. And do your job.
We don't have any clue what really happened here. Unless we read that e-mail and know the people involved, we don't know. We also don't know what he did to remedy it.
This sounds ugly, but some of you people in here are acting like he did more than he did. If it's as serious as it sounds, this needs to go through court, I assume cases are lined up.
Because its the most effective vote of no confidence.Expecting is one thing. Walking out and stopping work is another.
He is being sued by the government of California. SEC is investigating him. What is walking out accomplishing here?
If the guy is guilty, he is gonna get fired or arrested. Plain and simple. All this nonsense about employees staging walkouts is for the cameras.
Why didnt they stage walkouts before this happened? How comes none of this shit about Activision come out before the State of California filed a lawsuit against Activision? None of these people went to Schrier who made a career out of reporting abuse. None of them went to the mainstream press when the whole MeToo movement exploded a few years ago. Werent they themselves complicit? Should I stage a walkout on neogaf because these guys didnt speak up when it mattered?
Again, walking out is the issue I have with this. If Kotick is guilty, by all means throw him in jail and lock away the key. You can go back and view the thread I made when this story first broke. I have no sympathy for these execs. What I dont care for is this nonsense walking outs. Go back to work. And do your job.