https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/...a-china-standoff-bhutan-holds-its-breath.html
"But the latest standoff has inflamed festering resentments over India's influence in the country. In particular, many suspect that India has sought to block Bhutan's efforts to establish diplomatic relations and expand trade with Beijing, fearing that a rapprochment could remove the strategic buffer that Bhutan provides."
"But when India ordered its troops across the border on June 16, it seemed to do so without a request from Bhutan. While Bhutan has condemned the Chinese road work, it has studiously avoided saying whether it asked India to intervene. The Indian government has also avoided this question."
"Many interviewed in Bhutan expressed more concern about India's actions than China's. Some note that one effect of India's move - intended or not - has been to undermine border negotiations with China that could have cleared the way for closer economic ties."
"After decades of tilting almost exclusively south, Bhutan has begun looking north to China. In 2012, the prime minister at the time met with his Chinese counterpart at a Group of 20 summit meeting in Rio de Janeiro. Not long afterward, India cut subsidies to Bhutan for cooking oil and kerosene. The move was widely seen as retaliation."
"We try to protect the interest of our big brother, referring to India. But they feel that if we get closer to the north, we might not be as dependent on them".
NYTimes definitely not painting India's actions in a good light. It's pretty clear that India's action in Bhutan has been in it's own self interest, not in Bhutan's. It wants to maintain a strategic position over the Siliguri Corridor that the Chinese road threatens, as well as maintain its suzerainty over Bhutan that the Bhutanese themselves have been chafing under for a while now.