Dusk Golem
A 21st Century Rockefeller
Huh. So I get those emails from RE.net about those quizes they hold, most of the time they're not anything special, just kind of dorky stuff, and today's was too but it made me think on something I hadn't thought of before.
Brad Vickers is the only RE character to appear in all three of the original RE games, huh? I mean I knew that technically I guess, I just had never thought about it and it's a bit strange the development teams behind these games decided to move Brad into each RE game.
I mean the reasoning is obvious enough, Brad is the only non-main RE character to escape the initial Mansion incident. So probably in RE2 they snuck him in as an, "awww, Brad..." sort of deal, and then in RE3 decided to show how he died and gives a way for Nemesis to demonstrate his S.T.A.R.S. mission and twisted tentacle killing without killing anyone major. So from that angle it makes a lot of sense why he appears in all three, he was the 'easily disposable' survivor from the original game. But now I find myself curious what went down when they were deciding to include Brad in RE2 and RE3.
Also this reminds me I kind of wish the series would be more willing to kill its darlings. The series is about people coming out of terrifying situations, I do understand that. But the series is very apprehensive to killing its darlings, which I do understand as killing them off will piss off some fans and turn some people away from the series. But I think doing risky moves like that can benefit a story about constant deadly danger, especially as when we start having reoccurring characters we have characters who have literally survived and beaten several major incidents involving monsters, villains, and various dangers. Chris and LEon are the two most reoccurring characters, canonically just in the games and CG films (I'm not delving into things like the mangas or stage plays or whatever) we know of nine incidents Chris has survived so far, and seven incidents Leon has survived.
I also kind of like the series being goofy with that and having reoccurring characters, but I am curious how the series might be if it decided to kill darlings every once in a while. At this point in time, the only 'darling' character the series has killed really is Albert Wesker. And even then, though they killed him they won't let him die (but I'm okay with that and how they've handled it actually, though curious where that odd Umbrella Corps plot point is eventually going to lead to).
Brad Vickers is the only RE character to appear in all three of the original RE games, huh? I mean I knew that technically I guess, I just had never thought about it and it's a bit strange the development teams behind these games decided to move Brad into each RE game.
I mean the reasoning is obvious enough, Brad is the only non-main RE character to escape the initial Mansion incident. So probably in RE2 they snuck him in as an, "awww, Brad..." sort of deal, and then in RE3 decided to show how he died and gives a way for Nemesis to demonstrate his S.T.A.R.S. mission and twisted tentacle killing without killing anyone major. So from that angle it makes a lot of sense why he appears in all three, he was the 'easily disposable' survivor from the original game. But now I find myself curious what went down when they were deciding to include Brad in RE2 and RE3.
Also this reminds me I kind of wish the series would be more willing to kill its darlings. The series is about people coming out of terrifying situations, I do understand that. But the series is very apprehensive to killing its darlings, which I do understand as killing them off will piss off some fans and turn some people away from the series. But I think doing risky moves like that can benefit a story about constant deadly danger, especially as when we start having reoccurring characters we have characters who have literally survived and beaten several major incidents involving monsters, villains, and various dangers. Chris and LEon are the two most reoccurring characters, canonically just in the games and CG films (I'm not delving into things like the mangas or stage plays or whatever) we know of nine incidents Chris has survived so far, and seven incidents Leon has survived.
I also kind of like the series being goofy with that and having reoccurring characters, but I am curious how the series might be if it decided to kill darlings every once in a while. At this point in time, the only 'darling' character the series has killed really is Albert Wesker. And even then, though they killed him they won't let him die (but I'm okay with that and how they've handled it actually, though curious where that odd Umbrella Corps plot point is eventually going to lead to).