Like down trodden and broken Rick flair? Because that's how I'm seeing him right now.Bernie ain't Sting, Bernie is Ric Flair.
Like down trodden and broken Rick flair? Because that's how I'm seeing him right now.Bernie ain't Sting, Bernie is Ric Flair.
Like down trodden and broken Rick flair? Because that's how I'm seeing him right now.
Bernie ain't Sting, Bernie is Ric Flair.
I am capable of respecting Warren's endorsement and also choosing to throw my vote away on a third party.
lets get this straight Bernie is a broke ass Elizabeth Warren not the other way around.
Liz supporters begrudgingly got on the Bernie wagon after bae wouldn't run.
lets get this straight Bernie is a broke ass Elizabeth Warren not the other way around.
Liz supporters begrudgingly got on the Bernie wagon after bae wouldn't run.
And she's incredibly enthusiastic about getting in the race. Ugh, yes. It's so ironic considering everyone has been talking about the Democratic Party fracturing when they've spent the entire night alone uniting.
Yeah, Bernie's run began on the back of the Warren4Pres efforts.lets get this straight Bernie is a broke ass Elizabeth Warren not the other way around.
Liz supporters begrudgingly got on the Bernie wagon after bae wouldn't run.
The election is happening. I'm confused. This is about unifying dems.Schattenjäger;206272587 said:I don't understand these endorsements after she clinched the nomination ..
Between warren and Obama... She already has the nomination...
The endorsement is worth much more while the election is still happening
Do they just not want to look like they are endorsing the losing side?
I think Warren wanted to just stay out of the Bernie/Clinton campaign so she could focus on Trump.Schattenjäger;206272587 said:I don't understand these endorsements after she clinched the nomination ..
Between warren and Obama... She already has the nomination...
The endorsement is worth much more while the election is still happening
Do they just not want to look like they are endorsing the losing side?
Schattenjäger;206272587 said:I don't understand these endorsements after she clinched the nomination ..
Between warren and Obama... She already has the nomination...
The endorsement is worth much more while the election is still happening
Do they just not want to look like they are endorsing the losing side?
I mean primary election.The election is happening. I'm confused. This is about unifying dems.
Schattenjäger;206272587 said:I don't understand these endorsements after she clinched the nomination ..
Between warren and Obama... She already has the nomination...
The endorsement is worth much more while the election is still happening
Do they just not want to look like they are endorsing the losing side?
Schattenjäger;206272587 said:I don't understand these endorsements after she clinched the nomination ..
Between warren and Obama... She already has the nomination...
The endorsement is worth much more while the election is still happening
Do they just not want to look like they are endorsing the losing side?
Warren and Obama carry more weight than most other Dems. They're more valuable to bring Sanders supporters in the fold.Schattenjäger;206272979 said:I mean primary election.
I get the reason for it .. But wouldn't it be expected?
I get it .. But are they really endorsements to endorse a particular candidate or just to unify and bring in Sanders supportersWarren and Obama carry more weight than most other Dems. They're more valuable to bring Sanders supporters in the fold.
Schattenjäger;206273495 said:I get it .. But are they really endorsements to endorse a particular candidate or just to unify and bring in Sanders supporters
Hypothetically, if Sanders clinched the nomination, would Obama and Warren still endorse Clinton? I don't think they would ..
So is it really an endorsement or just a gesture to help unify the party?
Schattenjäger;206273495 said:I get it .. But are they really endorsements to endorse a particular candidate or just to unify and bring in Sanders supporters
Hypothetically, if Sanders clinched the nomination, would Obama and Warren still endorse Clinton? I don't think they would ..
So is it really an endorsement or just a gesture to help unify the party?
Both. Look at the GOP side. Trump won ages ago and people that first enforces him are already starting to walk back on it.Schattenjäger;206273495 said:I get it .. But are they really endorsements to endorse a particular candidate or just to unify and bring in Sanders supporters
Hypothetically, if Sanders clinched the nomination, would Obama and Warren still endorse Clinton? I don't think they would ..
So is it really an endorsement or just a gesture to help unify the party?
The comments sections on the sites reporting this are nasty.
These Bernie or Busters are like talking to a brick wall.
If Liz Warren, Bernie, Obama and other progressives are on board with getting work done with a Clinton administration, what more do they want?
Voting for Trump or not voting to spite the "Morally corrupt DNC" is basically saying you think the Republican legislative agenda is just fine.
A Trump presidency with a Democratic Congress means very little still gets done.
A Trump presidency with a Republican majority is a disaster.
A Clinton presidency with progressives having a senate majority is the most ideal.
WASHINGTONAddressing reporters after meeting with President Obama at the White House this morning, Bernie Sanders called upon his followers to post long-winded, extremely aggressive rants on social media, according to local supporter Ryan Baileys interpretation of the speech. Id like you to go on Facebook or Twitter and harass as many people as possible with spiteful, protracted tirades, said the Vermont senator in Baileys inference of the speech, which demanded that he and any other voters still committed to political revolution reply to anyone who challenged their opinion with a barrage of sharply worded displays of sanctimony and condescension, as well as any number of personal insults. If somebody tries to get you to calm down or walk back your rhetoric, dont hesitate to double down by questioning their intelligence and maligning their integrity before blocking them entirely. Also, if you see anybody sharing a conflicting point of view anywhere online, it is imperative that you attack them at once with a series of furious and preferably misogynistic responses. According solely to Baileys own perception of the speech, Sanders then concluded his remarks by asking supporters to send a threatening email to Democratic Party officials or members of the media.
The comments sections on the sites reporting this are nasty.
These Bernie or Busters are like talking to a brick wall.
If Liz Warren, Bernie, Obama and other progressives are on board with getting work done with a Clinton administration, what more do they want?
Voting for Trump or not voting to spite the "Morally corrupt DNC" is basically saying you think the Republican legislative agenda is just fine.
A Trump presidency with a Democratic Congress means very little still gets done.
A Trump presidency with a Republican majority is a disaster.
A Clinton presidency with progressives having a senate majority is the most ideal.
That article was so savage and hilarious. The Onion is usually on point with their political stuff.
Of course, I would not be shocked if some people online accused The Onion of still being biased against Bernie since the owner is a Hillary supporter. I know there were accusations when he bought the website.
That article was so savage and hilarious. The Onion is usually on point with their political stuff.
Of course, I would not be shocked if some people online accused The Onion of still being biased against Bernie since the owner is a Hillary supporter. I know there were accusations when he bought the website.
The backlash against Bernie is so nuts. I've never seen a politician go from hero to zero so fast. What an election.
Bernie is more like the Brooklyn Brawler. Talks a huge game but comes up short.