• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Revisiting Romero's Day of the Dead (Gory, GIF heavy thread, and spoiler warning)

Status
Not open for further replies.
tumblr_m91hx35YOb1r7gljio1_500.gif


The first time I saw Day of the Dead I was probably about ten years old. In other words, probably too young. Memories of Dawn of the Dead putting me on my parents floor at night were still fresh in my mind, but I always had a thing for the macabre, so I felt compelled to finish what I had started.

I don't remember much of my first experience with Day of the Dead, other than that it had a lovable zombie named Bub, was pretty depressing, and that seeing this:
tumblr_n6vozlH5OW1r2r5igo1_500.gif

while eating a bowl of this:
Put me off chili for months.

Overall, though, what I really remembered about the film was that I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as Night or Dawn. It was a mean, ugly, dark film, and had a hell of a lot of talking in it for a zombie movie.

Recently, I had the urge to revisit the film, thanks to its badass cover art on Netflix:
I'm glad I ended up rewatching the film, because it's a damn fine zombie flick. Certainly not as tightly crafted a film as Night, and it lacks the character and sheer imaginative scope of Dawn, but it has a lot going for it in its own right.

For starters, the beginning of the film is absolutely great. It kicks of with an absolutely killer nightmare sequence, with this gem of a jump scare:
tumblr_lvusd81dlh1qcay1ao1_500.gif


And then it continues in a bleak, zombie filled romp through florida. The soundtrack has some really fantastic moments, as does the sound design in general. The Gorillaz seem to think so as well, considering they used music and audio from the opening sequence for this song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElFlaWfx7LU (as well as a few of their others).

I think the biggest things going against Day is its pacing, choice of location, and characters. It's a slow movie. There are a lot of really long scenes of people talking in a dank, uniformly grey, underground bunker. That's not to say there aren't plenty of entertaining moments though, as the characters--particularly the miliary members--are totally hammy stereotypes. But...they're also thoroughly unlikeable, apart from the charming, "but still not as likeable as Dawn's characters" obvious good guys. They're just too broad to carry any sort of engaging dialogue, despite their amusing/obnoxious scenery chewing. But Bub makes up for them all, that magnificent bastard!
tumblr_ln9kwcw8l71qzr8nao1_500.gif


But I suppose the film is not complicated one, and doesn't demand complicated characters. Where Dawn was a social commentary on consumerism, Day has a simple message. In fact, it has probably the simplest message you could possibly have: treat others the way you want to be treated. The dead may be at the characters' walls, but if you throw civility out the window, then humans are just as bad--if not worse--than the flesh eaters themselves.

The pacing and location issues do hold the film back, but they are made up for in other areas. The bunker complex offers a drab color palette, but Romero and his DP actually managed to make a rather handsome film out if, with a ton of memorable shots, and they even play with some cool colored lighting in the caves towards the end. The framing is quite good at times too, whether its a decapitated zombie head blinking in the foreground while the protagonists flee out of focus, or the shadow of an undead's outstretched arm clutches out against a characters chest.

As for the pacing, well, let's just say its worth it for the climax:
1373635589_tumblr_m6ukfweqkm1qj7u8ao1_500.gif

tumblr_lvus3aPf0t1qcay1ao1_500.gif


It's glorious. There's tons of amazing gore effects, creative (well deserved) character deaths, and memorable zombies (clown zombie!), and and tense zombie action. It's utterly cathartic, and a concentrated dose of everything great in a zombie film.

The movie's far from perfect, but I feel it is sorely underrated (even though until now I was a part of the problem). If you ever find yourself trapped in a zombie apocalypse with nothing to do, you could do worse than giving this movie a watch.

Thanks for reading!
tumblr_maknqgVNgE1rt8levo1_500.gif
 

ZeroCDR

Member
One of my favorites, the original Dawn of the Dead being my favorite film of all time.

Dawn of the Dead has that bit of hopefulness and fun to it, living in a mall. Day of the Dead? Fuck you, be somber in these dank tunnels with all these crazy military guys, it's really depressing and hopeless.
 
One of my favorites, the original Dawn of the Dead being my favorite film of all time.

Dawn of the Dead has that bit of hopefulness and fun to it, living in a mall. Day of the Dead? Fuck you, be somber in these dank tunnels with all these crazy military guys, it's really depressing and hopeless.

Apart from the sunny, chillin on the beach ending that is. But I agree, there was a sense of whimsy to Dawn that wasn't really present in Day: it's mostly nasty people doing nasty things in nasty places for two hours. But, as I detailed in my post the movie has a heap of redeeming qualities to it. But I still definitely place Night and Dawn above it.
 
Loved the ending. The ultimate "fuck this we out." So satisfying.

Totally. I loved seeming them just chilling the hell out on the beach. That's exactly what I'd be doing in case of a zombie apocalypse.

Also, just wanna add: this movie made me want to replay the classic Resident Evils like no other. Those games did a terrific job channeling the vibe of the Romero movies.
 
I love this movie, though not as much as Dawn of the Dead. Great music, gory as heck, and seemingly hopeless (until the end). It's weird, though. The character I hate the most (Pvt Steele) had the best actor. He was the most believable guy there!
 

Tokubetsu

Member
To this day, my favorite "of the Dead" film. Everyone in it is some kind of asshole and I think it's the bleakest of the series as well. You get the impression that most of these characters are just simply tired of not being dead yet. Whether they realize it or not.
 

Leynos

Member
Bub of course is the best zombie of all time, it's really worth a watch for his performance alone.

Bub is great, but let's not forget Fido;
MV5BMjEzNjQ4OTYxMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjY5MDEwNQ@@._V1_SX640_SY720_.jpg


or Tar Man:
tarman-1.jpg


We watched Day of the Dead in college, and my roommate screamed like a little girl, and ran out of the room at that first jump scare in the very beginning. He never lived it down.
 
Tom Savini is a god (makeup effects for the movie)

Savini-on-the-convention-circuit.jpg


Seriously this movie has some great makeup work. I first saw it in high school and loved it. The bunker setting was well done imo, there's something about a group of protagonists holed up in a shelter or confined place that creates a cool atmosphere. Not the best Romero work but I still loved the mood he captured with the setting.

Edit: Also great gifs op, rly takes me back.
 

I'M FINISHED!

Um exCUSE me Sakurai but CLEARLY the best choice for Smash Bros would be my fav niche character HOWEVER you are clearly INCOMPETENT and
Best zombie movie of all time. The only other zombie movie that can even challenge it are other Romero zombie movies.
 
I love the little touches like the guy's scream that gets higher pitched as his head is pulled off and the vocal cords get stretched. Great OP, by the way.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
Outstanding film. And kudos on Romero for making each film in the trilogy completely different to the last. Going from confined horror in the first to a broader satire and winding up with a nihilistic piece on cabin fever.
 
I love the little touches like the guy's scream that gets higher pitched as his head is pulled off and the vocal cords get stretched. Great OP, by the way.

Thanks! Yeah, the little details that went into each death were fantastic, and I would have to say that was probably my favorite of the deaths for that detail.

Outstanding film. And kudos on Romero for making each film in the trilogy completely different to the last. Going from confined horror in the first to a broader satire and winding up with a nihilistic piece on cabin fever.

Yeah, I really appreciated the different vibes he did for each film as well. He tried to do a commentary on class disparity in Land of the Dead (as well as expanding on a 'Bub' like character), but he wasn't nearly as successful as he was with the original trilogy.

Why did you stop the gif before the zombie pulled out the rubber chicken out of Rhodes? That was funny.

Sorry! That was the best gif I could find!
 
Yeah, I really appreciated the different vibes he did for each film as well. He tried to do a commentary on class disparity in Land of the Dead (as well as expanding on a 'Bub' like character), but he wasn't nearly as successful as he was with the original trilogy.

Land is very good though. I see it going through a similar life as Day. Not well received at first ("it doesn't match his other films"), but slowly people appreciate it for what it is, instead of what it isn't.
 
Land is very good though. I see it going through a similar life as Day. Not well received at first ("it doesn't match his other films"), but slowly people appreciate it for what it is, instead of what it isn't.

I still enjoy it quite a bit, I just think it lacks some of the vibe that made the original three so special. I haven't seen it in a long time though, and I do remember liking it significantly more the second time around. Maybe I should give it another watch soon.
 

lazygecko

Member
The original script can be found somwhere online as well. Suggest reading through it. The movie was originally meant to be much larger in scope, with an entire underground society split into rich and poor territories. And an army of trained zombie soldiers like Bub. Not saying that would have made the final film any better, but interesting nonetheless.
 

Draft

Member
I paid cash money for the soundtrack. The first two tracks are the score, and they are glorious. I love how the jaunty steel drum beat is interwoven with a melancholy synth. As the OP notes most of the movie is set in caves or dingy underground office space, but there are many scenes in beautiful, sunny Florida. Trouble in paradise is an understatement! Juxtaposing the tropical environment with the gloomy prospect of a zombified world is a neat idea only made neater by doing something similar with the soundtrack.

The next couple tracks are also the score, but with clips of dialog or sound effects from the movie mixed in. Like, here's the music, and playing over it is zombie groans, gun shots, cries of terror and pain, doors opening and closing, and other garbage. Very weird.

The last few tracks are dated pop songs. I don't remember them from the movie, but maybe they played over the credits or in the background? They aren't great. If nothing else, they ensure everyone knows this is a movie made in 198X.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
I still enjoy it quite a bit, I just think it lacks some of the vibe that made the original three so special. I haven't seen it in a long time though, and I do remember liking it significantly more the second time around. Maybe I should give it another watch soon.

While Night is far more of an achievement, I place it on a similar level to Land. Both films are better than most the genre for trying to say something, it's just that neither engages me particularly character wise. Dawn and Day are just phenomenal at that side, Romero at the peak of his powers.

That said, Dennis Hopper was a tremendous antagonist in Land. Just brilliant.
 
The original script can be found somwhere online as well. Suggest reading through it. The movie was originally meant to be much larger in scope, with an entire underground society split into rich and poor territories. And an army of trained zombie soldiers like Bub. Not saying that would have made the final film any better, but interesting nonetheless.

Sounds like most of those ideas made it into Land of the Dead!
 

liquidtmd

Banned
The opening for this movie is one of my favourite openings of all time.

The movie with the nature of its characters makes itself less likeable than Dawn but Rhodes is an awesome villain and there is much dark enjoyment to be had. Must rewatch.
 
The opening for this movie is one of my favourite openings of all time.

Definitely. The opening is amazing from the score, the jump scare, the awesome title shot, and the bizarre, yet perfect, little touches like the alligator.

It may not be as iconic in the pulp culture lexicon as Night, or even Dawn's, openings but I'd say it's easily lives up to its pedigree.
 

Magical Drop

Neo Member

It's probably just me, but there's always been something about this calender that's creeped me out since I was 13 and first saw this film.

Don't know if it's just because of what happens in that scene, but everything from the angle of the photo, the crazy assed subject, coupled with the music and sounds at that point, just makes me feel `bleurgh` inside when I even think about it.

On a slightly lighter note, I wonder if they got that scene in one take, or how many fake walls they had to go through?
 
It's probably just me, but there's always been something about this calender that's creeped me out since I was 13 and first saw this film.

Don't know if it's just because of what happens in that scene, but everything from the angle of the photo, the crazy assed subject, coupled with the music and sounds at that point, just makes me feel `bleurgh` inside when I even think about it.

On a slightly lighter note, I wonder if they got that scene in one take, or how many fake walls they had to go through?

I like to think Romero didn't tell her and just scared the shit out of her with it with the first take.

The whole movie makes me feel 'bleurgh' inside. I think it mostly has to do with just how bleak the compound is. It opens on an utterly gray and lifeless room, and then all she has is this pathetic picture of a pumpkin patch to stroke. It made me feel really alone and claustrophobic.
 

bob_arctor

Tough_Smooth
One of the best--and overlooked--zombie flicks. Definitely my second favorite Romero after Night. Wasnt this hurt at the box office by its sheer bleakness? There was a move to "lighter" horror at the time but maybe I'm remembering wrong. Movies like House or Fright Night is the style I'm thinking of.
 
One of the best--and overlooked--zombie flicks. Definitely my second favorite Romero after Night. Wasnt this hurt at the box office by its sheer bleakness? There was a move to "lighter" horror at the time but maybe I'm remembering wrong. Movies like House or Fright Night is the style I'm thinking of.

Well Romero split with his John Russo after Night of the Living Dead, Russo went on with the rights to movies with 'living dead' in the title, so he teamed up with Dan O'Bannon to do the 'return of the living dead' and it's sequels which were much more comedic than Romero's films.

One thing that surprised me about Day was that while it is pretty relentlessly bleak, there is still a lot of really dark and macabre humor in it. Stuff like the blinking zombie head, Dr. "Frankenstein", and other visual gags and over the top characters gave it a twisted sense of levity to keep things from getting too bleak.

I can believe that it's grimness hurt it at the box office though, especially if horror was trending even further into more lighthearted camp territory.
 

John Dunbar

correct about everything
i bought this on dvd a while ago. when i started watching it, it seemed really off and not at all what i expected.

that was because it was some direct to dvd piece of shit sequel, that had somehow ended up on the disc. the dvd box and the cover of the dvd itself were all legit day of the dead, but it had the wrong fucking movie on it. how is that even possible?
 

bob_arctor

Tough_Smooth
Well Romero split with his John Russo after Night of the Living Dead, Russo went on with the rights to movies with 'living dead' in the title, so he teamed up with Dan O'Bannon to do the 'return of the living dead' and it's sequels which were much more comedic than Romero's films.

One thing that surprised me about Day was that while it is pretty relentlessly bleak, there is still a lot of really dark and macabre humor in it. Stuff like the blinking zombie head, Dr. "Frankenstein", and other visual gags and over the top characters gave it a twisted sense of levity to keep things from getting too bleak.

I can believe that it's grimness hurt it at the box office though, especially if horror was trending even further into more lighthearted camp territory.

Looking it up, it released in July, on the same day as Back to the Future! Crazy. Return of the Living Dead released in August. 1985 was pretty amazing for movies generally.
 

wenis

Registered for GAF on September 11, 2001.
One of the more thematically strong zombie films ever done. My secret favorite of the trilogy (although I love em all for varying reasons).
 
Looking it up, it released in July, on the same day as Back to the Future! Crazy. Return of the Living Dead released in August. 1985 was pretty amazing for movies generally.

Definitely. You also have The Breakfast Club, The Goonies, First Blood Part II, The Color Purple, and Commando among others.
 

Rockandrollclown

lookwhatyou'vedone
One of the best--and overlooked--zombie flicks. Definitely my second favorite Romero after Night. Wasnt this hurt at the box office by its sheer bleakness? There was a move to "lighter" horror at the time but maybe I'm remembering wrong. Movies like House or Fright Night is the style I'm thinking of.

It wasn't just how dark it is. Day of the Dead was unrated, which limited how it could be advertised. In fact its also why we didn't get Romero's original Day of the Dead. They told him he could have more money and make the epic he wanted to make, but it had to be rated R, or he could take less money and make the movie unrated.
 
It wasn't just how dark it is. Day of the Dead was unrated, which limited how it could be advertised. In fact its also why we didn't get Romero's original Day of the Dead. They told him he could have more money and make the epic he wanted to make, but it had to be rated R, or he could take less money and make the movie unrated.

That would definitely do it. I'm glad he stuck to his guns though, I'd take a halved budget unrated Romero movie rather than a more sprawling, but artistically compromised one.
 

wenis

Registered for GAF on September 11, 2001.
well we also saw what happened when Romero finally did get that big budget...

njbnfd87mzdjk0u.jpg


real talk, I saw that movie at least 11-12 times in theaters and countless times on dvd, but the movie overall wasn't great. good, but not on the level of the initial first three films.
 
real talk, I saw that movie at least 11-12 times in theaters and countless times on dvd, but the movie overall wasn't great. good, but not on the level of the initial first three films.

Yup, that's how I feel about it, too. I like the concept behind it and there are some solid moments in it, though.
 
On a slightly lighter note, I wonder if they got that scene in one take, or how many fake walls they had to go through?

This shot is very expertly planned out and it shows. Her head and upper body are perfectly framed by the arms because some are intentionally not busting all the way through the wall. And that's at least ten people's worth of actual arms busting through a section of wall that's about as big as a corkboard. They probably rehearsed the hell out of it.
 
Trilogy ? What about Land of the Dead ?

Nope!


Speaking of which, was the original script for Day of the Dead ever leaked?
I remember reading about a script was released, but it was just a revised version of the final movie.

The original was the Romero's version of the World's armies taking on the zombies.
 
well we also saw what happened when Romero finally did get that big budget...

real talk, I saw that movie at least 11-12 times in theaters and countless times on dvd, but the movie overall wasn't great. good, but not on the level of the initial first three films.

Honestly, I like Land more every time I see it. It's ongoing reception has been remarkably similar to Day. The more people see it, the more accepting they are of its faults. All of his films have faults, but there is a charm and personality that are unique to Romero.

Also I've read the original Day script on HomepageOfTheDead.com. Not sure if it's there any more, but it was good. I don't think it was any better than what we got in the end. It was a bigger more action packed version. It had too many characters. It would have needed another draft, and the editing room is where it would have really been made anyway, so it's hard to judge.

There was also and earlier draft of Land out there too (back when it was called Dead Reckoning?). I can't remember it too much, but I remember enjoying it. It was written pre-9/11 so it didn't have the terrorist stuff if I remember correctly. I feel it was also a bigger movie than Land wound up being too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom