I don't mean Splinter is a neutral but rather the vote blocker. Not that I think it's likely but the possibility is there.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Rick & Morty [Mafia] |OT| Someone's been spending too much time around glowing rocks
- Thread starter AbsolutBro
- Start date
I don't mean Splinter is a neutral but rather the vote blocker. Not that I think it's likely but the possibility is there.
I'm inclined to believe that he's at least not-scum, but he was part of the Election scum team that did test out their powers on each other so he's not without precedent.
Nomadic Sparks
Banned
vote: Swamped [/quote]
Aggressive """neutrals """ are as bad as scum if not worst then scum
Defend yourself
Aggressive """neutrals """ are as bad as scum if not worst then scum
Defend yourself
But why Splinter's vote? To prevent another possible tie based on who he might pick?
Oh well didn't know if could vote in the same post
I still suspect Bronx-Man, but I want to get a better read on people now. Especially those who are casting the net wide at a variety of targets.
Nomadic Sparks
Banned
Vote: Swamped
Hyper agressive """Neutral""" are as bad as scum if not worse then scum
Damn phone posting
Hyper agressive """Neutral""" are as bad as scum if not worse then scum
Damn phone posting
Aggressive """neutrals """ are as bad as scum if not worst then scum
Defend yourself[/QUOTE]
What's with your tags?
What has zeusy done to earn a reprieve from your vote? I could see the point if you wanted to switch to someone else but just unvoting seems odd.
most of fat's posts don't seem to state much of anything of substance
it's activity padding. he can't even come up with a lynch idea for D1 beyond targeting an inactive.
it's coasting in plain sight, and no one has the balls to call him on it because making fewer posts is less offensive to y'all than fluffposting
it's activity padding. he can't even come up with a lynch idea for D1 beyond targeting an inactive.
it's coasting in plain sight, and no one has the balls to call him on it because making fewer posts is less offensive to y'all than fluffposting
The Wizard
Member
Good to be playing, too bad I've had a lot going on the past few days including throwing a suprise birthday party and helping host an amateur counter strike tourney. Things are starting to calm down so I hope to be able to catch up on events and provide more informed thoughts.
This is the most interesting outcome of day 1 I feel, we have Bronx making a list that lines up too well with the vote list which seems like an easy way to appear to be participating without providing any opinions. The no vote isn't too alarming to me, I can see someone forgetting to on day 1 when there isn't a lot to go on. Dusk's vote to avoid a tie the clear vote leader is also pretty suspect. I feel like my day 2 vote should go to one of these two but I can't suss who's less trustworthy here.
I'm not sure. If I had the role, I would target someone who is relatively vocal and maybe wanted to vote for someone on the scum team. Though I wouldn't be surprised if they just picked randomly from the more active players since it was only N1.
Why do you think Swamped is a neutral? They haven't even been playing aggressively.
this is an interesting alignment of language from Penguin that sets him up to sheep Faddy perfectly
Got what i wanted
To see who would pick up on your bad play???
You say bad, i say free spirited
acohrs, can you explain your take on Zeusy's response to you? what did you like about it? what were you expecting?
Nomadic Sparks
Banned
I'm bandwagoning for now
Ok are you going to tell us what insights your experimental strategy has produced or will you be taking them to your grave?
didn't teach you in school to never, ever give in to peer pressure?
A bandwagon only you are on?
any ideas yet?
you're not just spectating, y'know. involve yourself in conversations that are about you
Only I can pull off bad plays
Are you Sleepy Gary and are assigned to eliminate either Jerry o Beth as a win condition?
This is extraordinarily specific and makes little sense from either a lore perspective or a game perspective
What even prompts this
If someone asked whether or not I were a PR they'd be more likely to get a vote than an answer
if I could vote
I have truly outrageous quota to meet
The Wizard
Member
The way I read it is Swamped is looking at Splinter as possibly being a neutral role and Nomadic has somehow got these mixed up and targeted Swamped. I don't like this vote, why "bandwagon" with something you can't even be sure to take the time to get the details of right?
I don't think it's indicative either way, but alright
I don't follow this line of thought, explain.
Uh not too sure, maybe because day one I jokingly said I think splinter was scum, I needed conversation!
When we sound a beige alert
The Wizard
Member
Even on a hunch chasing supposed neutrals early on doesn't seem right to me, doesn't their chaotic nature tend to benefit town more than scum?
Dr Worm did the same thing in Arkham. Two people used a similar phrase and he immediately linked them.
Don't you want me baby? Don't you want me ohhhhhhhh?
Hmm Arkham was the only game I've partaken in so far, but I do remember early on folks saying it's a bad habit to use someone's play in a previous game to determine their leanings.
Which makes sense.
Anyhow, I'll try to make a read list tonight!
