Anyone that sticks out so far? What do you think about the vote leaders?Comes with my usual caveats, but acohrs seems more like town acohrs rather than scum acohrs so far.
Anyone that sticks out so far? What do you think about the vote leaders?Comes with my usual caveats, but acohrs seems more like town acohrs rather than scum acohrs so far.
Anyone that sticks out so far? What do you think about the vote leaders?
Peeps I got a good feeling on so far:
Sorian
CCS
acohrs
Splinter
Fat4All
Peeps Im feeling iffy on:
Zipped
Zeusy
Zee
Faddy
Dusk Soldier
Not saying I think yall are scum, but the way youve been playing so far is making me arch an eyebrow. Not a Rock eyebrow, more like a fancy frenchman hearing that hell have to wait 30 mins on the escargot.
Bias towards who?Think you might have a subconcious bias there.
Not sure I can trust your analysis this early in the game.
Bias towards who?
Thought day end was tomorrow, usually I'm fine on weekends but rougher when I'm visiting family and on mobile the whole time.
Offhand, I'd say I'm town reading Panda, Fat, and Splinter. Panda is a lot of a gut read just with how he's been playing. Fat, for how much he usually gifs and shit posts, has had moments where he's cut through the bullshit and said what I was thinking, and I already talked about Splinter and honestly with how Ty4on gave me weird push back on it, I'm feeling contrarian on the read now.
For scum, I obviously have Faddy but the rest is harder. No one has really done a whole lot bad overall. I'm more on meta for the rest, who is quiet that usually isn't? Ouro and Burb come to mind when I think like that. I did like Kawl thinking on it now though.
Why are you continuing to push a scum read on me. It makes zero sense. I have a soft claim that I am not an Ordinary Parasite, so that would imply that I have a greater role. Why do you want to lynch someone in my position?
Sounds more like you are interested in scaring people off a lynch with threats like this over actually being helpful (which you haven't been all day)
Peeps I got a good feeling on so far:
Sorian
CCS
acohrs
Splinter
Fat4All
Peeps Im feeling iffy on:
Zipped
Zeusy
Zee
Faddy
Dusk Soldier
Not saying I think yall are scum, but the way youve been playing so far is making me arch an eyebrow. Not a Rock eyebrow, more like a fancy frenchman hearing that hell have to wait 30 mins on the escargot.
Are your lists 5 and 5 because there should be roughly 5 scum by the rules of the plot and it'd seem sketch if you landed on the exact number for one or is that just a coincidence? I guess the best bet for either list would be to mix and match scum and town and frontload one with scum and a few town while the other has more town and one scum, then make sure that the scum from the town-heavy list and the town from the scum-heavy list get killed to make them more trustworthy. So the number might actually be a coincidence or an attempt to hide bias. Or maybe you just like symmetrical lists, I dunno.
I don't like giving Bronx too much credit for things but 5 would be the correct number of scum and not because the plot demands it. Mafia games tend to err on the side of 20-25% being mafia. The five percent discrepancy is for neutrals. Lower percent if any neutrals would be scum aligned and higher if they would be town aligned.
Well, 5 Smiths
A happy coincidence. No one worth their salt designs a game that way. If the number of players demanded 4 or 6 then someone would have been dropped or somehow added.
I'm not liking that zeemumu vote. I agree with Sorian that zeemumu was just looking a bit too hard at something that wasn't really there, but I appreciate that they were making a sincere effort.
Also, the calling out of the inactive is a low effort ploy as well. I think Kalor just made my list.
Speaking of lists, is there a list anywhere of what pronouns I should be using for each player?
No, it's usually the OP list. I also messed up your gender, didn't I?
I'm not liking that zeemumu vote. I agree with Sorian that zeemumu was just looking a bit too hard at something that wasn't really there, but I appreciate that they were making a sincere effort.
Also, the calling out of the inactive is a low effort ploy as well. I think Kalor just made my list.
Speaking of lists, is there a list anywhere of what pronouns I should be using for each player?
Alright Kalor is paying attention, and Zeemumu is a good voteI'll put my vote on zeemumu for now. Their repeated posts about the scum team feels like they could be trying to appear more active without contributing too much.
Vote: zeemumu
Burbeting feels weird to me as well. Their two posts are both related to Ouro/ Sorian being scum and nothing besides that. There's a 9 hour time gap between the posts so it's not even a bit that they did for a little while. It's something that they came back to for whatever reason.
Comes with my usual caveats, but acohrs seems more like town acohrs rather than scum acohrs so far.
...Its literally just a list of people that stood out enough in a good way or bad way.Are your lists 5 and 5 because there should be roughly 5 scum by the rules of the plot and it'd seem sketch if you landed on the exact number for one or is that just a coincidence? I guess the best bet for either list would be to mix and match scum and town and frontload one with scum and a few town while the other has more town and one scum, then make sure that the scum from the town-heavy list and the town from the scum-heavy list get killed to make them more trustworthy. So the number might actually be a coincidence or an attempt to hide bias. Or maybe you just like symmetrical lists, I dunno.
How do you feel about Sorian RN
that's a pretty interesting conclusion to draw from this
Comes with my usual caveats, but acohrs seems more like town acohrs rather than scum acohrs so far.
Hmm I do take this read pretty seriously because you know acohrs far better than I do, but you could be scum. Thing is, I'm scum-reading acohrs. He threw some low-key shade on me which he never really followed up on.
VOTE: acohrs
I could also vote for Ouro, Zeemumu, or Burb.
Idk, I've always found meta stuff to be really risky, without a strong set of variables. So many different things can change someones game. A really strong power role vs a reg town, a weak power role, a better theme, ect. ect.
I realize that you have different motives, but lynching someone off of that presumed play switch(even if it isn't imagined) seems misguided.
Every single person who has voted for me has done so with no explanation. Not sure what you'd like to hear from me when you do that.
Why?Boom.
Vote:Sorian
Why?
Why?
If y'all could just explain your votes when you make them, that'd be swell.Why?
If y'all could just explain your votes when you make them, that'd be swell.
LoC, what do you think about Ouro?
Who is this a response to or is just general frustration?
Clearly a response to Zeusy but judging from your last couple posts, I'm questioning how much you are even reading. It has happened more than once though.
Every single person who has voted for me has done so with no explanation. Not sure what you'd like to hear from me when you do that.
So mostly frustration then.
Because Zeusy just dropped an unexplained vote on you. They didn't ask to hear anything from you or thought there was something missing that you hadn't said.
Do you think scum would find you a safe vote or safe person to FoS because of last game?
I'm easily a meme vote. With the right push, people would sheep a vote on me because it's funny and "Sorian is too dangerous to be alive"
So yes, I can be a safe vote in cases like this where no one has really differentiated themselves from the pack, nothing to do with last game though.