Ridge Racer on DS or PSP?

Moegames

Banned
Lets do some comparisons here :)

DS
924896_20041122_screen004.jpg
924896_20041122_screen003.jpg

924896_20041122_screen005.jpg
924896_20041122_screen002.jpg

924896_20041122_screen001.jpg
ridge-racer-ds-20041122052704310.jpg

ridge-racer-ds-20041122052703888.jpg
ridge-racer-ds-20041122052702154.jpg


PSP
ss1-11b.jpg
ss1-12b.jpg

ss1-13b.jpg
ss1-1b.jpg

ss1-15b.jpg
ss1-18b.jpg

ss1-22b.jpg
ss1-25b.jpg
 
DS version of course. Because it has better graphics. Just getting the bizarre answer out of the way before 100 people say PSP version.
 
:lol

PSP is so mine. whats even funnier is this is the only game i'll buy UNLESS namcos next console RR includes elements from this game.

is that the moon or a cheese puff? :lol
ridge-racer-ds-20041122052704310.jpg
 
Seriously...what does this prove?

PSP looks better; PSP games will look better than DS games.

Most pointless. Thread. Ever.
 
I prefer the look of the DS game, the PSP one looks too detailed and there are probably times when you won't know whether to turn left or right because there's so much annoying detail in the way.

PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.

:)
 
Grubdog said:
I prefer the look of the DS game, the PSP one looks too detailed and there are probably times when you won't know whether to turn left or right because there's so much annoying detail in the way.

PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.

:)


and I mean c'mon...how can I play this without a graphically represented STEERING WHEEL.
 
Musashi Wins! said:
and I mean c'mon...how can I play this without a graphically represented STEERING WHEEL.

I pasted a steering wheel clipart onto my analog sticks just to prepare.
 
Okay, that's enough already. There's like three other threads with all this already going on.
 
Speevy said:
This thread proves that racing games are so worth buying any system for.

I bought a Saturn and a PS1 for racing games back in the day.. Daytona and Ridge Racer actually. Im also willing to bet alot of people bought a PS2 for GT3.
 
Grubdog said:
PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.

:)

I feel the same. I'm not sold on either game yet but the main thing turning me off of PSP Ridge Racer is this kind of garbage

ridge-racers-20041119061357226.jpg


And the thought of me feeling stupid for buying a $200 system for a racing game.
 
You have to understand speevy, he doesnt outright troll anything... he just gives them underhanded compliments.
 
The touchscreen is so fucking useless in that game... It's like saying : "Hey, we have to develop a game for the DS, but there's a second screen and we have to use it for something...."
 
arent systems usually launched with flashy arcade racers? usually there's your standard fighter, racer, action game.
hell i think this game is worth buying a PSP for, just look at it!!
 
StoOgE said:
I bought a Saturn and a PS1 for racing games back in the day.. Daytona and Ridge Racer actually. Im also willing to bet alot of people bought a PS2 for GT3.



All sarcasm aside, I disagree. Racing games make up but one staple of any lineup, and indeed no respectable system exists without them. But I'd much rather have any number of action titles that have been featured on the PS2.

Gamers of all ages can play a racing game, but what's selling RR and GT4 Mobile is the graphics, and not so much the name. If...let's say...God of War Mobile was on the horizon, I imagine that it would be a more interesting launch title for people to talk about, and GT4 could back it up.
 
Grubdog said:
I prefer the look of the DS game, the PSP one looks too detailed and there are probably times when you won't know whether to turn left or right because there's so much annoying detail in the way.

PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.

:)
:lol
 
what's up with all the Ridge Racer threads latley? This game aint no Zelda or Halo. Make a fucking offical ridge racer thread if that is the case.
 
The DS as a system doesn't lend itself to these kind of ports, I believe they are being rushed out the door while titles that will ultimately define the DS are still being developed.

There is no comparison, if you want Ridge Racer, buy a PSP.
 
seismologist said:
I feel the same. I'm not sold on either game yet but the main thing turning me off of PSP Ridge Racer is this kind of garbage

ridge-racers-20041119061357226.jpg


And the thought of me feeling stupid for buying a $200 system for a racing game.

Then why don't you look at the 5,000 other screenshots that actually look good? :lol
 
I've checked this guys Moegames post history, 14 or so of his 17 posts were DS trolls. Not good ones either.
 
Grubdog said:
I prefer the look of the DS game, the PSP one looks too detailed and there are probably times when you won't know whether to turn left or right because there's so much annoying detail in the way.

PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.

:)

It's fine if you don't care about graphics, but to say that the graphical detail of PSP RR might hinder gameplay (because you can't tell whether to turn right or left) is pure nonsense. If anything, more detailed and stable graphics make it easier to make out the track, and people have already played a ton of graphically impressive racers on the PS2, Xbox and GC to prove that it doesn't negatively affect gameplay.
 
Man, this thread would be welcome if (a) RR wasn't an overhyped series only getting exposure b/c it's the only good-looking game on the PSP and (b) if there weren't already two threads dedicated to this specific flamewar already. Man, even I'm getting tired of this, and I can't get enough DS ownage. :lol PEACE.
 
seismologist said:
I feel the same. I'm not sold on either game yet but the main thing turning me off of PSP Ridge Racer is this kind of garbage

ridge-racers-20041119061357226.jpg


And the thought of me feeling stupid for buying a $200 system for a racing game.
Really? I'd feel stupid for paying $200 for a system that should cost $150-180. But that's just me. :lol PEACE.
 
Without question, the PSP RR looks to be the one to own, appearing to stay faithful to the franchise while delivering beautiful visuals and graceful handling. Conversely, RR DS looks like shit and requires you to navigate the car using an unwieldy touchscreen interface.
 
This is probably the 3rd or 4th thread in same amount of days where the trolls compare DS vs PSP RR. We got the point already that the DS version is inferior graphics vise. Please.
 
Speevy said:
Gamers of all ages can play a racing game, but what's selling RR and GT4 Mobile is the graphics, and not so much the name. If...let's say...God of War Mobile was on the horizon, I imagine that it would be a more interesting launch title for people to talk about, and GT4 could back it up.

Nice graphics are an initial attraction but you cant say its the only attaction. There is a history of very good gameplay associated with each series that really drives the attention.

The lame touch screen control is my only real concern about the DS version so far. The boost blur does increase my anticipation.
 
As a RR fan, I wish there was less attention being focused on PSP RR. I want to enjoy the game in peace, but with RR games being Sony platform launch titles, I guess that's not possible.
 
I just don't get the DS. Wasn't it announced after the PSP? Is it Nintendo's response to the PSP? If so, why is it so insufficient? Doesn't Nintendo realize how substandard the system looks next to the PSP? With the PSP rumored to be arriving here at an affordable price, is there really any point in owning a DS, aside from the necessity of owning anything Nintendo that many are enslaved by?
 
XS+ said:
I just don't get the DS. Wasn't it announced after the PSP? Is it Nintendo's response to the PSP? If so, why is it so insufficient? Doesn't Nintendo realize how substandard the system looks next to the PSP? With the PSP rumored to be arriving here at an affordable price, is there really any point in owning a DS, aside from the necessity of owning anything Nintendo that many are enslaved by?

Please. I'll most likely be picking up a PSP when it's launched (Mainly for Lumines) and I already own a DS. The systems are unique enough to warrant owning both, Warioware alone makes me glad I invested in the DS.

IHBT, IHW
 
DS Ridge Racer all the way. The touchscreen control may be mediocre, but then the dpad is still there. And lets be honest, RR64 played better with the crappy N64 dpad anyway. The dpad on the DS is even better and with what will probably be a better frame rate it will probably play better than that. Not only that, but unlike the psp, single cart multiplayer will make this the best handheld racing experience around. Well, that is until Mario Kart with each player having their own screen owns us all.
 
I wanted to get in this post before it becomes a classic...you know, since they don't have novelty t-shirts or anything like that.

Also, has anyone played RR PSP yet? There's still a possibility it could play like shit, right? :-\
 
lockii said:
Please. I'll most likely be picking up a PSP when it's launched (Mainly for Lumines) and I already own a DS. The systems are unique enough to warrant owning both, Warioware alone makes me glad I invested in the DS.

IHBT, IHW

What's unique about the DS, save for the superficial? Nada. The PSP is the first system to deliver current generation graphics in a handheld. The DS offers us graphics that are marginally better than what we saw on a PS1. We're long acquainted with the visuals that we take from the PS2, Xbox, and Cube. Why take a step backwards with the DS? Laughably, Nintendo attempts to compensate for that huge shortcoming with the patronizing gimmick of a touchscreen.
 
captmcblack said:
Also, has anyone played RR PSP yet? There's still a possibility it could play like shit, right? :-\

Does not compute. It's Namco, It's Ridge Racer, It's new Sony hardware.

What's unique about the DS, save for the superficial? Nada. The PSP is the first system to deliver current generation graphics in a handheld. The DS offers us graphics that are marginally better than a PS1. We're long acquainted with the visuals that we take from the PS2, Xbox, and Cube. Why take a step backwards with the DS? Laughably, Nintendo attempts to compensate for that huge shortcoming with the patronizing gimmick of a touchscreen.

This would be funny if it weren't so hypocritical -- I'm hoping you own an Xbox. I don't consider the touchscreen a gimmick, not with what little footage I've seen. Games like Kirby, Touch n Go and Warioware will all offer new, innovative and fun gameplay.
 
XS+ said:
is there really any point in owning a DS, aside from the necessity of owning anything Nintendo that many are enslaved by?

It's not made for the people who consider the graphics to be the single most important feature of all video games. The 'point' is every single other feature of the DS.

For the record, I don't feel "enslaved" in the slightest by this rad little refreshingly unique console that I've been having tons of fun with over the last few days. I can't wait to see where they go with it!

Why is Ridge Racer DS such a huge focus anyway? I'm not convinced that the vast majority of DS owners care about it at all.
 
lockii said:
This would be funny if it weren't so hypocritical -- I'm hoping you own an Xbox. I don't consider the touchscreen a gimmick, not with what little footage I've seen. Games like Kirby, Touch n Go and Warioware will all offer new, innovative and fun gameplay.

That doesn't quite work. The difference between the three consoles is much smaller -- negligible, even -- than the yawning gulf between the PSP and DS. No hypocrisy there. Anyway, my point is, I don't know too many people that will settle for the visuals on display in this thread. Why not come out with a true successor to the GBA, rather than this half-assed ploy to undercut Sony?
 
XS+ said:
That doesn't quite work. The difference between the three consoles is much smaller -- negligible, even -- than the yawning gulf between the PSP and DS. No hypocrisy there. Anyway, my point is, I don't know too many people that will settle for the visuals on display in this thread. Why not come out with a true successor to the GBA, rather than this half-assed ploy to undercut Sony?

This half-assed ploy is selling like hotcakes in the United States right now.
 
Top Bottom