• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rolling Stone: Inside the Koch Brothers' Toxic Empire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rolling Stone did an expose on the Koch Brother's empire, their political power, and the history of their family as continual rich, political interests. I know there was a topic recently on another article about the Koch brothers, but this time I'm posting one that is extremely damning, and approaching it from the historical perspective it presents. I felt it warranted a separate topic. It's from the end of September but I didn't find a topic on it.

I think this article is extremely valuable and important to anyone who wants to know the sheer extent of the bullshit these people have spread and controlled in America for a century, starting with Hotze Koch, a railroad baron, and his sons Fred and Charles.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/inside-the-koch-brothers-toxic-empire-20140924

On what kind of man Hotze/Harry Koch was-

"My mother was afraid of my father," said Bill, as were the four boys, especially first-born Frederick, an artistic kid with a talent for the theater. "Father wanted to make all his boys into men, and Freddie couldn't relate to that regime," Charles recalled. Frederick got shipped East to boarding school and was all but disappeared from Wichita.

On managing to legally rip off a competitors-

In the company's telling, young Fred was an innovator whose inventions helped revolutionize the oil industry. But there is much more to this story. In its early days, refining oil was a dirty and wasteful practice. But around 1920, Universal Oil Products introduced a clean and hugely profitable way to "crack" heavy crude, breaking it down under heat and heavy pressure to boost gasoline yields. In 1925, Fred, who earned a degree in chemical engineering from MIT, partnered with a former Universal engineer named Lewis Winkler and designed a near carbon copy of the Universal cracking apparatus – making only tiny, unpatentable tweaks. Relying on family connections, Fred soon landed his first client – an Oklahoma refinery owned by his maternal uncle L.B. Simmons. In a flash, Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. had contracts to install its knockoff cracking equipment all over the heartland, undercutting Universal by charging a one-time fee rather than ongoing royalties.

On how the Koch ancestors helped empower the economy of the Soviet Union under FUCKING STALIN -

Fred started looking for partners abroad and was soon doing business in the Soviet Union, where leader Joseph Stalin had just launched his first Five Year Plan. Stalin sought to fund his country's industrialization by selling oil into the lucrative European export market. But the Soviet Union's reserves were notoriously hard to refine. The USSR needed cracking technology, and the Oil Directorate of the Supreme Council of the National Economy took a shining to Winkler-Koch – primarily because Koch's oil-industry competitors were reluctant to do business with totalitarian Communists.

Between 1929 and 1931, Winkler-Koch built 15 cracking units for the Soviets. Although Stalin's evil was no secret, it wasn't until Fred visited the Soviet Union, that these dealings seemed to affect his conscience. "I went to the USSR in 1930 and found it a land of hunger, misery and terror," he would later write. Even so, he agreed to give the Soviets the engineering know-how they would need to keep building more.

On Fred and Charles Koch perpetuating racism and being a racist themselves-

Fred also became a major benefactor and board member of the John Birch Society, the rabidly anti-communist organization founded in 1958 by candy magnate and virulent racist Robert Welch. Bircher publications warned that the Red endgame was the creation of the "Negro Soviet­ Republic" in the Deep South. In his own writing, Fred described integration as a Red plot to "enslave both the white and black man."

Charles was already falling under the sway of a charismatic radio personality named Robert LeFevre, founder of the Freedom School, a whites-only­ libertarian boot camp in the foothills above Colorado Springs, Colorado.

On oil theft from Native Americans-

In 1989 a Senate committee investigating Koch business with Native Americans would describe Koch Oil tactics as "grand larceny." In the late 1980s, Koch was the largest purchaser of oil from American tribes. Senate investigators suspected the company was making off with more crude from tribal oil fields than it measured and paid for. They set up a sting, sending an FBI agent to coordinate stakeouts of eight remote leases. Six of them were Koch operations, and the agents reported "oil theft" at all of them.

One of Koch's gaugers would refer to this as "volume enhancement." But in sworn testimony before a Texas jury, Phillip Dubose, a former Koch pipeline manager, offered a more succinct definition: "stealing." The Senate committee concluded that over the course of three years Koch "pilfered" $31 million in Native oil; in 1988, the value of that stolen oil accounted for nearly a quarter of the company's crude-oil profits. "I don't know how the company could have figures like that," the FBI agent testified, "and not have top management know that theft was going on." In his own testimony, Charles offered that taking oil readings "is a very uncertain art" and that his employees "aren't rocket scientists." Koch's top lawyer would later paint the company as a victim of Senate "McCarthyism."

On using fake public demonstrations to destroy the Clinton administrations BTU tax-

To fight this threat, the Kochs funded a "grassroots" uprising – one that foreshadowed the emergence, decades later, of the Tea Party. The effort was run through Citizens for a Sound Economy, to which the brothers had spent a decade giving nearly $8 million to create what David Koch called "a sales force" to communicate the brothers' political agenda through town hall meetings and anti-tax rallies designed to look like spontaneous demonstrations. In 1994, David Koch bragged that CSE's campaign "played a key role in defeating the administration's plans for a huge and cumbersome BTU tax.

There a shitton more, and I recommend reading the entire thing. You'll read about their terrible, fraudulent business practices, their creation of the modern Republican party and attempt to create the modern Libertarian party, their destruction of the environment, their decades-long fight to end regulation of corporate interests by the government, and their overwhelming ability to get off light on any charges ever leveraged against them even before they had massive political power.


Thanks for posting this. Mother Jones has had a feature on their web of influence that should make for a good supplement to the article in the OP.

Oh, and if you want to read the book that influenced the RS article and was written by one of the authors of the above page, you can read Sons of Wichita by Daniel Schulman. I plan to.
 

entremet

Member
Crazy thing is that they're not satisfied. They want more power and influence. These dudes are borderline sociopathic.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
One of them is a science nerd who funds Nova, among other things. But yes they are in the business of calculated evil and as far as I can tell they're libertarian solely because it is compatible with existing riches.

If democratic politics supported their industry (more) they'd be democrats.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
How did those rape allegations turn out? Oh yea the didn't do shit and backed the bogus writer with a slap on the wrist

And? Every major publication endures a scandal of bad reporting, libel or appropriation. Do we stop reading everything? If it's false Koch industries will destroy it.
 
I remember watching a documentary about them on Netflix a while back (I forgot the name).
These guys are the reason this country is where it's at right now.
 
How did those rape allegations turn out? Oh yea the didn't do shit and backed the bogus writer with a slap on the wrist

EDIT: I mixed up the Washington Times and the Washington Post. My mistake. I'll be more careful of that in the future. Apologies to Deuce, too, as my post was based on my mistake.

The article accusing said fraternity was by a different writer. The writer of the Rolling Stone article is generally only a contributing editor, and also writes for Mother Jones and Wired.
 
Washington Post is legit. Moon owns Washington Times.

Ah, thanks! I got them mixed-up in my head. My bad. I thought it was weird that I found no mention of Moon when I re-checked my facts on the Post, but I had them so mixed-up at the time I literally wasn't seeing that the names were different.

@below post: I actually did take the time to fact-check, but I got too ahead of myself at the same time. Like I said, I'll be more careful in the future. Actually, that would be a helpful tag to have to remind me to be more careful. "Doesn't know how to fact check". lol
 
They retracted the article and apologized for it after intense media scrutiny, yeah. Media scrutiny which, by the way, was created and instigated by the accused fraternity and the ever-reliable Washington Post.

The article was a mistake, but publications are allowed to make a mistake, unless they're Democratic-leaning and the ones criticizing them are Conservative interests, eh?

Also, the article accusing said fraternity was by a different writer. The writer of the Rolling Stone article is generally only a contributing editor, and also writes for Mother Jones and Wired.
I love that you can't even get the facts right just like the Rolling Stones eh? Washington Post and Washington Times are two different things, right? It even says so on the wikipedia page you linked.

I love that you imply people who dislike the Rolling Stones for this aren't Democratic and must be right wing Fox News watching 'Mericans.

Also Rolling Stones hasn't apologized to the fraternity in question, only the misleading article. This is because they are currently in a suit and that would be basically admitting guilt. Haven't checked the status on this so this may have changed.

This is just a post regarding you and not the article in question. I'm just defending the other poster. I'm perfectly fine with reading this article, just to make it clear.
If you're interested in other reading that corroborates the story they're telling, that is a good collection.
Thank you. Makes me feel better reading this because another source may back it up. Always good to have nack up. Will read.
 
How much money do the Koch brothers spend on humanitarian efforts? I honestly just can't imagine having that much money only to use it all to fuck over your fellow man and make more money. I mean what is even the point.
 
How much money do the Koch brothers spend on humanitarian efforts? I honestly just can't imagine having that much money only to use it all to fuck over your fellow man and make more money. I mean what is even the point.

All billionaires give to charity. It's not really an indicator of much.
 

davepoobond

you can't put a price on sparks
And "Dixie".

the Kochs make the Dixie cups

You guys didn't go to many parties did you

those are solo cups not Dixie

sounds like YOU don't go to many parties

bzt-019_1z.jpg
 
How much money do the Koch brothers spend on humanitarian efforts? I honestly just can't imagine having that much money only to use it all to fuck over your fellow man and make more money. I mean what is even the point.

That Netflix documentary I mentioned before, mentioned that one of them donated a lot to this one certain charity. I wish I can remember the name of the documentary and the charity, but my memory is fuzzy thanks to booze and lack of sleep. Someone help me out please!

---edit---
Oh I'm sure they give to charity but I was more wondering do they spend more on charitable donations or politics
They've clearly spend more money on politics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom