And I hope you would at least put some effort in your trolling, but as you will learn in time young grasshopper, is that some things are just not meant to be.I hope Trainwreck(94% RT) steps all over Ant-Man this weekend.
And I hope you would at least put some effort in your trolling, but as you will learn in time young grasshopper, is that some things are just not meant to be.I hope Trainwreck(94% RT) steps all over Ant-Man this weekend.
It worked, though. I got people talking about Trainwreck for half a page.And I hope you would at least put some effort in your trolling, but as you will learn in time young grasshopper, is that some things are just not meant to be.
Ant-Man's at 76% now.
ALARM TRIGGERED!!!SOUND THE ALARMS!
It worked, though. I got people talking about Trainwreck for half a page.
That damn irreverence.
And back down. I got a feeling that this will settle at about 75. Then again, I'm pretty bad at predicting the RT so what do I know.Ant-Man's back up to 77%.
Got tickets for tonight. I hope the heart and humor can reach the levels found in a Guardians of the Galaxy.
On topic of box office, I just don't think it will beat an Apatow/Schumer combo.
Updated with a few more reviews and GAF impressions. This seems to be bouncing between 76 and 78. A shame since a solid 80 is so much more mentally satisfying than 78 or 79
By "mental satisfaction" I mean an 80 is perceived mentally as much better than a 78 or 79 compared to the difference between 76 and 78. I'm not saying it means anything about the movie's quality, just that it's a mental pitfall.I think this is kind of the thing that's wrong with review threads. Why in the world do you need mental satisfaction for something you haven't seen yet? Unless you have, in which you should probably already have your own personal conclusion on where it falls.
Wanting something to do well based on popular perception isn't always the best idea, in my opinion. I think it sends mixed messages to Hollywood and ties monetary compensation to often meaningless and the whims of reviewers. It's the kind of thing where it becomes important because we make it so important. We can't say "oh, ignore the reviews" for this movie and then champion the reviews for another.
By "mental satisfaction" I mean an 80 is perceived mentally as much better than a 78 or 79 compared to the difference between 76 and 78. I'm not saying it means anything about the movie's quality, just that it's a mental pitfall.
Thats how positive sounds these days. Rosenbaum was right I guess.
Oh, I know what you meant, but that's kind of my point: Isn't that an admission what reviews actually say are becoming meaningless to the degree that a number makes a better marketing point?
Reviews, to me, are discussions. No movie's perfect, and a consensus is never an indication of anything other than "this movie offended the least amount of people".
I guess my point is that we're the people who should be talking the least about metascores. We're the informed, those that know enough about film and have seen enough to have conversations outside of marketing.
But anywho, I'm sure people get really fucking annoyed that this gets brought up in every RT thread, so I'll drop it.
Rude/crude like the Simpsons.Could someone explain what irreverance means with an example? English is not my first language
Rude/crude like the Simpsons.
The RT score keeps fluctuating between 76% & 78%.
Hopefully it ends with an 80%.Yup, back to 78%
When will this rollercoaster end?
"It has to be 80% or the film is trash!"You guys are hilarious.
It's Certified Fresh, that's good enough for me. A nice cool 80% would just be icing on the cake."It has to be 80% or the film is trash!"
Actually I am going to see Minions rated 55%. Not that excited, but yeah...
It's Certified Fresh, that's good enough for me. A nice cool 80% would just be icing on the cake.
Who knows what Wright’s artistry would have made of this? But Reed and his crew do just fine. It’s annoying to think that the Marvel tractor beam is just going to suck up all of these good, well-delineated characters. Still, here in this little speck of the Disney galaxy, where cleverness and feeling are prized over bigness and brand continuity, it’s not Marvel’s universe that Ant-Man seems sprung from. It’s Pixar’s.
Got tickets for tonight. I hope the heart and humor can reach the levels found in a Guardians of the Galaxy.
On topic of box office, I just don't think it will beat an Apatow/Schumer combo.