• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Funny you mention that, I've always hated the stasis pod room in the film, and I was watching the special features yesterday, and saw that some of that was actually real, I thought that shiny plastic was just bad CG, it was actually perfectly matching the real life horrible thing they shot.

You mean where Jake first sees his avatar? I actually thought it looked rather good. I liked that set. But yeah, the avatar link-up room. Lulz.

We gonna get some Na'vi submersibles in the next film or what?
 
You mean where Jake first sees his avatar? I actually thought it looked rather good. I liked that set. But yeah, the avatar link-up room. Lulz.

We gonna get some Na'vi submersibles in the next film or what?
No, I mean the bit when he wakes up? A fifth of tequila and an ass kicking.
 
YTQUx.jpg

Cryovault is boss.
 
Oh man, I love the cryo-vault. Nooo! I think it looks pretty great.
I really like the composition of those shots, but I've never liked the texture, and that strange diffused, but extremely bright lighting.

To weigh in on the Dances with Wolves thing, the white man savior is an old concept, lots of films and other media have used, but Cameron does choose to use the diary as the narrative driving device, and source of voice overs too, so it certainly has a lot in common. I see a lot of The New World in it too, although logically that's not likely, or possible really.
 
I kinda hope Cameron ditches the ongoing narration for the next film. But I know he won't. It's used so sparingly in his other films. It's like running commentary throughout Avatar.
 
Stuburns- I know what you mean , I think it's that people like us see so many movies these days that abuse CG , our eyes have just become overly aware of it.

For me the first huge offense was in indy4, obviously a Lucas lead decision to use CG gophers in the opening scenes but man. It's like, ever since then I can't help but "notice" CG all the time, good /bad/ugly.


That picture you posted- is it from the Life of Pi ? See the first thing I saw for that was an entire scene from the film where hundreds of fish are flying all over and the kid and the tiger are fighting to grab some of them. I thought it was a low budget student art film at the time and then I find out it's actually a big budget hollywood film later on and went "huh?"

Many people this week were complaining about pacific rim and ... I get the feeling in that case the monsters in particular are going for a "man in a rubber suit" look. Which... is a bit odd given that a man in a rubber suit would cost a helluva lot less then spending time and money to make CG look intentionally poor...


---

Given that this is the avatar thread- is it odd to admit that I only ever saw it once ? Went opening night , saw it in 3d - loved it! and then bought the 2d barebones bluray that came out a few months later and never did bother to sit through it. Last week I got a 55 inch 3dtv and I'm wondering if I should just turf that copy off and grab the 3d version... Part of the reason why I never watched the 2D bluray is that I figured it would tarnish my opinion of the movie.
 
I kinda hope Cameron ditches the ongoing narration for the next film. But I know he won't. It's used so sparingly in his other films. It's like running commentary throughout Avatar.
It would be unusual given Jake won't logically be making diary entries. I could imagine it more like Titanic, with it spotted throughout in the context of an actual storyteller, or he'll just drop it entirely. There was so much sci-fi in Avatar that he had to very clearly convey, to even the simplest of audience members, that he had to be a little didactic about it I think.
That picture you posted- is it from the Life of Pi ?
It is, indeed. I was considering going to see it next week, just go without seeing a trailer, I'm very glad I checked it out first.
Given that this is the avatar thread- is it odd to admit that I only ever saw it once ? Went opening night , saw it in 3d - loved it! and then bought the 2d barebones bluray that came out a few months later and never did bother to sit through it. Last week I got a 55 inch 3dtv and I'm wondering if I should just turf that copy off and grab the 3d version... Part of the reason why I never watched the 2D bluray is that I figured it would tarnish my opinion of the movie.
I think the 3D is nicer, it's just a bit dirtier, but it certainly looks beautiful flat too. I actually never could get used to fades in 3D, it's almost as if they should fade to flat too.

As for the spoiler talk, it's my fault really, I shouldn't have posted a screen, even if it's from a trailer, I know some people like to go in completely blind.
 
It wasn't the trailer grab that annoyed me, though I admit I hadn't noticed that before. It was the other poster who just spoiled a pretty big scene without any thought to at least using tags.
 
I feel like the spoiler thing has brought the mood down a little. I really just wanted to heap some fresh praise on what is still the best CG I've ever seen, and still by an almost shameful degree.
 
Yeah don't worry about it. As I keep explaining in the other thread, my creating it is mainly motivated by The Hobbit stuff this week.

But anyway yes, I don't see many films coming close to Avatar in the CG department for a good while. I'm excited to see Gollum in The Hobbit though.
 
is the next Avatars gonna be at 48fps? I hope so because after seeing Hobbit at 48fps, I don't want to see another 3D movie at 24fps.
 
That .. that was a spoiler ?


I mean sheesh sorry I guess ? it was seriously played as a trailer in front of Prometheus . I haven't seen the film itself so I have no idea where in the film that bit was taken from but some studio head felt it was okay to make that the first way I learned of the films existence.

If this is to do with the question I posed about stu's picture well, again, I've since seen the actual trailer for life of pi and gathered the general plot , so I don't think that picture really means anything unless you put on a blindfold and earplugs during the trailer.

Shit, I didn't even know until very recently that life of pi was based on a book.
 
That's honestly the first time I've heard that joke. You clever fella.

What can I say.

In all honesty I'm not a fan of Avatar but I'm curious to see where the narrative goes. I wouldn't imagine they'd tell the same story twice (and the ocean stuff sounds kind of cool).
 
Cameron was a camera operator on the Cirque du Soleil film

"Executive producer AND camera operator," he says from his farm in the Wairarapa Valley, on New Zealand's North Island. He shot much of what you see on the 3-D screen in "Cirque du Soleil: Worlds Away."

"I deferred to the director ("Narnia" vet Andrew Adamson) on everything creative. He had the hard job, and I got to have all the fun. I was strapping on a body harness and hanging from the rafters 30 feet above the stage, catching these performers flying around on wires, or up on the big wheel of death in 'Ka.' That's my idea of good clean fun."

I swear it's like he's doing everything there is to do in the world that isn't making the sequels. :lol
 
"I'm actually over here writing, because I need some peace and quiet," he told the New Zealand site Stuff.co.nz.

"So we're out on our farm in the Wairarapa and loving it. Unfortunately, it's distracting because it's so beautiful. You want to go fishing and on yachts and all that sort of thing. It's going to take me a while to get these scripts nailed down exactly the way I want them.
http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/arts-culture/blogs/new-zealands-beauty-may-delay-avatar-sequels

Ah well, I suppose it's better than phoning the scripts in while writing in a trailer home.
 
"I don't want to be writing the movie in post-production. We kind of did that on the first picture and I ended up cutting out a lot of scenes and so on."

How many years did he spend working on the first script?
 
Spending a couple months on a script, then pulling it out of a drawer and revising it ten years later doesn't equal ten years of writing.

LOL, I never said that he spent ten years writing it. I know that's what happened with Avatar's script, but I want to know how much time he actually spent writing or rewriting it. Also, I could never see Cameron nailing down a script exactly as he wants it. He's a perfectionist, I don't know if he could ever be happy about something without looking for ways to improve it.
 
LOL, I never said that he spent ten years writing it. I know that's what happened with Avatar's script, but I want to know how much time he actually spent writing or rewriting it. Also, I could never see Cameron nailing down a script exactly as he wants it. He's a perfectionist, I don't know if he could ever be happy about something without looking for ways to improve it.
He was pretty damn happy with his Aliens script. He's said he doesn't think he'll ever write a better script.
 
I miss the dark and gritty side of James Cameron. T1 is a bloody masterpiece, and I want another movie like that from good ol' James.
 
He's is in a strange place, he wants to build the most technically advanced films he can, the biggest in scope, and that requires very large sums of money. You could make an R-rated three hundred million dollar film, and Cameron is more likely to get the green light for that than literally anyone else, but it's just going to make it harder to make back that money.
 
I've had a strange experience this last week or so. A number of high profile trailers have emerged, some for films I've been waiting to get a good look at, and I've watched a few random things that have been coming up frequently on GAF, and amongst friends. Watching these trailers, something really struck me. How really terrible the CG looks to me. This could be for a few reasons, maybe they're not finished, maybe they're objectively below industry standards, and maybe I've changed. I did notice while looking at my blurays, I have almost nothing with significant CG that either isn't fully animated, like Wall-E, or isn't Avatar.

What's strange is I don't believe any of those three things are the case. Some of them are from finished films, they're all of major budgets, with top CG studios providing the work, and to test if I really had grown disdainful of CG, I watched Avatar again, and it is as stunning as I remember.

I had gone through and grabbed screens of offending scenes, to support this post, unfortunately, it's hard to see just how shit they look when they're not moving mostly. But certainly Man of Steel, Star Trek, Pacific Rim, The Hobbit, Life of Pi and World War Z were amongst them.

I happened to watch Inception the other day too, and that has some really horrible CG. Obviously there is tons of effects I couldn't even notice, in almost all films, digital set extensions, etc, but for some reason, I appear to really hate these major CG elements, and they stand out horribly every time I see them. For whatever reason, Avatar appears to be the lone exception. If anything, it's the live action I don't like in Avatar oddly.

I agree with this completely. Growing up in the 90's I've enjoyed the progression of CG. From early mind blowers like Terminator 2 and Jurrasic Park, through Independence Day, Titanic etc. It seemed like every 2 years or so (if not every year) there was something that would raise the bar. But it's been 3 years since Avatar, and I don't think anything has come close to touching it. Maybe some of the subtle uses of CG that are indistinguishable from reality, but in terms of a CG spectacle I've been sorely disappointed that nothing has stepped up to challenge Avatar.

3 years is an eternity in CG. What's going to overthrow it?!
 
Maybe some of the subtle uses of CG that are indistinguishable from reality, but in terms of a CG spectacle I've been sorely disappointed that nothing has stepped up to challenge Avatar.
Honestly I was more wowed by the visuals of Adventures of Tintin and some of the HFR scenes in The Hobbit than Avatar.

All of them are from Weta though.
 
Honestly I was more wowed by the visuals of Adventures of Tintin and some of the HFR scenes in The Hobbit than Avatar.

All of them are from Weta though.

Tintin is a good one, I forgot about that.

Hobbit isn't out in my damn country yet, but I'm very keen to check out the 48fps.
 
Tintin was fantastic, but still doesn't quite touch Avatar.

I can't wait to see how the real-time feed on the virtual cam looks in the BTS videos for the Avatar sequels.
 
I don't think The Hobbit is even close. Those trolls are laughable, as are the wolf things.

I thought Prometheus had incredible CG, but listening to the audio commentaries, the things I thought were amazing CG was actually very refined puppet work.
 
The Hobbit is almost cartoon-ish in nature, I'm willing to give WETA the benefit of the doubt and say it was almost on purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom