Seems weird that Cameron would allow that if true.Krev said:Only the IMAX versions are in 16X9.
Seems weird that Cameron would allow that if true.Krev said:Only the IMAX versions are in 16X9.
Krev said:Only the IMAX versions are in 16X9.
Dabanton said:Tension you could cut with a knife.
Great characters,and no music ruining scenes, i wish more films didn't feel the need to have overbearing music to help along a scene. A man in his bomb suit with some cutters and the soft blowing sound of the wind is more than enough.
But yeah see it. Don't expect an action film it's slow and it works for that,if you're one of those people who have film ADD i'd give it a pass.
It's the real version. The Scope ratio was 'extracted', so I guess cropped.PrivateWHudson said:Cropped or opened up?
stuburns said:It's the real version. The Scope ratio was 'extracted', so I guess cropped.
Scullibundo said:Fuck! Just checking out the IMAX sessions this weekend (it opens today here in Aus) so I can check when would be best to book for my second viewing and all sessions are either sold out, or only the front few rows are left!
Extracted just means took, they took the scope from the 16:9 which assuming he doesn't want a world of horrid distortion and artifacts, they probably cropped it yeah.PrivateWHudson said:WTF is extracted? Does that mean they cropped the 16/9 to get the scope version?
haha man, i booked seats for my second viewing tonight, last week! its all sold out now here too.Scullibundo said:Fuck! Just checking out the IMAX sessions this weekend (it opens today here in Aus) so I can check when would be best to book for my second viewing and all sessions are either sold out, or only the front few rows are left!
stuburns said:Extracted just means took, they took the scope from the 16:9 which assuming he doesn't want a world of horrid distortion and artifacts, they probably cropped it yeah.
Not really. It was shot in 1.78:1 since it's video, but it was framed it for scope. It's only in the taller ratio at IMAX so it fills more field of vision on their screens.Dan said:Seems weird that Cameron would allow that if true.
Krev said:Not really. It was shot in 1.78:1 since it's video, but it was framed it for scope. It's only in the taller ratio at IMAX so it fills more field of vision on their screens.
Scullibundo said:Do iiiiit!
Book for IMAX this weekend. Fuck I'm going to be trying to get more IMAX tickets for this weekend I just know it.
Also, I thought you disappeared from the thread. :lol
YepJustinian said:So only IMAX has the full height?
Sculli's australian.Zeliard said:Yet another reason to hate foreigners.
But he kept saying the 1.78 ratio was needed because of the 3D, so I'm surprised it's not also being employed at non-IMAX 3D screenings. It would seem to me that Cameron would now feel that only IMAX viewers are getting the proper version of the movie.Krev said:Not really. It was shot in 1.78:1 since it's video, but it was framed it for scope. It's only in the taller ratio at IMAX so it fills more field of vision on their screens.
He obviously changed his mind.Dan said:But he kept saying the 1.78 ratio was needed because of the 3D, so I'm surprised it's not also being employed at non-IMAX 3D screenings.
i love the variation in reviews for this. seems to be a love/hate thing. i can't actually see how people could walk out of it anything less than blown away, but everyone's differentJustinian said:Another rotten review added. 10 rotten with 57 fresh. Seems disproportionate.
Meus Renaissance said:Considering the budget, I'll be shocked if this thing breaks even. Unless there is a massive ship with Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio involved I doubt we'll be seeing a profit either
There's still a lot of positive reviews out there (such as Rolling Stone, which is from yesterday morning) that haven't been picked up. Not sure what their method is, but it seems like Avatar is heading for a 85-90% reading.Justinian said:Another rotten review added. 10 rotten with 57 fresh. Seems disproportionate.
I do wonder if 3D films will see the kind of long term runs as films did back in the day. The reason things like Gone with the Wind have so massively out performed Titanic is because they didn't have any home video system, so it got showed and rerun all the time. Now 3D is really here, most people have no, or wanky 3D at home. I could see that helping 3D films in the short term.Tricky I Shadow said:At this point I'd say that its a certainty that it will. A few weeks ago I predicted its worldwide gross will be $850,000,000. I'm sticking by that, and I wouldn't be surprised if it made more!
Krev said:Only the IMAX versions are in 16X9.
GhaleonEB said:There's still a lot of positive reviews out there (such as Rolling Stone, which is from yesterday morning) that haven't been picked up. Not sure what their method is, but it seems like Avatar is heading for a 85-90% reading.
The split seems fairly predictable, whether the conventional story and characters outweigh the style and visuals. I'm surprised it's as positive as it has been.
is it another GARBAGE review?Justinian said:Another rotten review added. 10 rotten with 57 fresh. Seems disproportionate.
CassidyIzABeast said:is it another GARBAGE review?
It seems like it, but I hesitate to call conspiracy. At any rate, by Saturday after release they usually have everything up, so it's just a matter of waiting to see where it lands. But I've rarely seen a percentage move that much once 60 or so reviews are in.Justinian said:It seems like every negative review is being added, while about 50 more positive ones are still out there.
G-Bus said:Actually kind of excited for this now that it's coming out in a few days. Going to be my first 3D movie too. Definitely taking the advice of so many and going the Dolby Digital 3D way. That's the good one right? I really don't know what to expect 3D wise. I've heard people talk about it but I'm having a hard time putting it in perspective. Should be fun!
Anyways, plan on going Saturday. Hope it's not super crazy and I don't have to wait in line or any bullshit like that.
Scullibundo said:5 HOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lame, should've went to the 8pm IMAX session that im attending.Scullibundo said:5 HOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DoctorWho said:I can't wait to see you shoot your load all over this thread.
Scullibundo said:Dolby is the worst way you could experience. Any of the alternative formats are better than Dolby as has been mentioned countless times in this and many other threads by many.
he's promising a level-headed review. i'm not convinced.DoctorWho said:I can't wait to see you shoot your load all over this thread.
Justinian said:Not as garbage as most.
Yeah me too, Cameron was even talking about how 2K/48fps was better than 4K/24fps so I kind of expected Avatar to be the latter.jett said:I'm surprised that digital projection is only 2k...that's just about 1080p more or less. I thought it'd be 4k.
PrivateWHudson said:Really? Maybe I'm just not reading it right, but the beginning praises the hell out of the movie, but towards the middle he goes off on a tangent about Bush, Cheney, Hannity, and Limbaugh. By the end, I don't have a clue as to what he's talking about. Some shit about a piano and a horse's birthday.
G-Bus said:Actually kind of excited for this now that it's coming out in a few days. Going to be my first 3D movie too. Definitely taking the advice of so many and going the Dolby Digital 3D way. That's the good one right? I really don't know what to expect 3D wise. I've heard people talk about it but I'm having a hard time putting it in perspective. Should be fun!
Anyways, plan on going Saturday. Hope it's not super crazy and I don't have to wait in line or any bullshit like that.
Oh man, Sculli gone fuck you up boy.SpacLock said:RealD is the best.
stuburns said:Yeah me too, Cameron was even talking about how 2K/48fps was better than 4K/24fps so I kind of expected Avatar to be the latter.