WyndhamPrice
Member
Scullibundo said:Gentleman, its been a pleasure.
I'm now off to go give my friend his bday present, then we're going to start heading toward IMAX.
![]()
I want Sculli to never post again after this one.
Scullibundo said:Gentleman, its been a pleasure.
I'm now off to go give my friend his bday present, then we're going to start heading toward IMAX.
![]()
Scullibundo said:Gentleman, its been a pleasure.
I'm now off to go give my friend his bday present, then we're going to start heading toward IMAX.
![]()
I guarantee if there was a theatrical release of a 48fps movie you'd have people bitching and moaning about how it looks like a soap opera.stuburns said:No I didn't, although you're right, that was piss poor writing. What I meant to say was Cameron was moaning that the industry is pushing 4k24fps (the standard for modern 35mm movies) when he believes 2k48fps is a better direction to take cinema.
I know I wouldpolyh3dron said:I guarantee if there was a theatrical release of a 48fps movie you'd have people bitching and moaning about how it looks like a soap opera.
I'm sure you're right, I agree with him though, motion artifacts from 24fps are really clear now everyone has bluray and HD. And it's virtually no harder to do it. If it'll be 48, or 60 or whatever I have no idea, but I think higher frame films are coming soon enough.polyh3dron said:I guarantee if there was a theatrical release of a 48fps movie you'd have people bitching and moaning about how it looks like a soap opera.
Count Dookkake said:You should have seen her at the Strange Days premiere after-party. No 'kinda' about it at all, at least back then.
jett said:The end of an era.
Now what awaits us is countless threads filled with useless information about Battle Angel Alita!
I kid buddy, have a good one.
The mixture of live-action and CG is a little trickier in 3-D than it is 2-D," Cameron told MTV News. "Now we see it's good to have done 'Avatar' first before 'Battle Angel,' because the tricky scenes are where you're blending live-action photography, stereoscopic photography and CG."
"Shooting live stuff in 3-D and then adding CG characters and landscapes beyond that, that's a little tricky," he explained.
As for where the film stands, Cameron seemed to indicate that "Alita" is still on his radar though he hasn't progressed to the point of casting the film thus far.
"We're not that far down the line," he said. "We have a very good script and we've done a lot of production design. We've done about a year of production design and we've put together an art reel that shows the arc of the film."
"It's pretty much just add water and we're ready to go," he laughed.
ZoddGutts said:Probably posted but in case it wasn't. Video interview of Cameron talking about Battle Angel. He confirms that there's a script already for it and that there's an arc reel footage of Battle Angel.
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/12/14/avatar-director-offers-update-on-battle-angel-alita-adaptation/
:lolWyndhamPrice said:I want Sculli to never post again after this one.
Fine by me, if only to increase the chances of the Wachowskis being the ones to direct a Battle Angel movie. Cameron doesn't have that in him other than the tech stuff. Maybe he could produce?jett said:Truthfully I think that if Avatar becomes a massive success we're gonna see at least a couple of straight sequels from Cameron.![]()
How could you possibly think the Wachowski's are better equipped to direct anything than James Cameron is?Dan said:Fine by me, if only to increase the chances of the Wachowskis being the ones to direct a Battle Angel movie. Cameron doesn't have that in him other than the tech stuff. Maybe he could produce?
Zophar said:How could you possibly think the Wachowski's are better equipped to direct anything than James Cameron is?
jett said:Strange, a few days ago I saw an interview with him where he said the opposite, that he was in a different place now and was unsure if he'd ever develop the movie.
Truthfully I think that if Avatar becomes a massive success we're gonna see at least a couple of straight sequels from Cameron.![]()
Zophar said:How could you possibly think the Wachowski's are better equipped to direct anything than James Cameron is?
Well, I take that back. Only they could have done Speed Racer, though I think that was more a momentary rush of blood to the head than truly indicative of their skill.
Speed Racer is their masterpiece, that's what I was getting at. I was trying to say that, as far as we've seen from them, they are merely competent as filmmakers. Cameron on the other hand has proven time and again he's among the best in the field, I can't understand how someone would prefer a lesser director handle a project that he's perfectly capable of taking on himself.jett said:What? Whatever people think of Speed Racer, it's masterfully directed by the Wachowskis and employs storytelling techniques never before seen.
I don't care much about Battle Angel, but news of the Wachowskis directing a live-action adaptation of Akira would be pretty much the greatest thing ever.
If we're talking about dream films and Akira, I'd kill a dozen people to see David Cronenberg do Akira with a massive budget.jett said:I don't care much about Battle Angel, but news of the Wachowskis directing a live-action adaptation of Akira would be pretty much the greatest thing ever.
In short, a) Speed Racer is fucking brilliant, and b) it demonstrates a unique command of space and time that would be absolutely perfect for handling the action sequences of Battle Angel. Cameron has absolutely no interest in experimenting with film language, and I firmly believe that Battle Angel's action sequences would completely require nontraditional techniques. Cameron's strength is in being the absolute best at very, very traditional cinema.Zophar said:How could you possibly think the Wachowski's are better equipped to direct anything than James Cameron is?
Well, I take that back. Only they could have done Speed Racer, though I think that was more a momentary rush of blood to the head than truly indicative of their skill.
I understand your point and I think it's valid, though I think you're being disingenuous about Cameron's capabilities. Now, I should preface I don't worship the man like Sculli or some other folks but it's pretty evident that he's redefined effects pictures at least three times through his career (in particular T2, Titanic, and now Avatar), his track record suggests that "traditional" is a misnomer because he has historically trailblazed what we consider traditional now.Dan said:If we're talking about dream films and Akira, I'd kill a dozen people to see David Cronenberg do Akira with a massive budget.
In short, a) Speed Racer is fucking brilliant, and b) it demonstrates a unique command of space and time that would be absolutely perfect for handling the action sequences of Battle Angel. Cameron has absolutely no interest in experimenting with film language, and I firmly believe that Battle Angel's action sequences would completely require nontraditional techniques. Cameron's strength is in being the absolute best at very, very traditional cinema.
Effects != film languageZophar said:I understand your point and I think it's valid, though I think you're being disingenuous about Cameron's capabilities. Now, I should preface I don't worship the man like Sculli or some other folks but it's pretty evident that he's redefined effects pictures at least three times through his career (in particular T2, Titanic, and now Avatar), his track record suggests that "traditional" is a misnomer because he has historically trailblazed what we consider traditional now.
That's a really nebulous concept, I'd love to hear how you feel the Wachowskis have changed film language.Dan said:Effects != film language
He hasn't trailblazed shit when it comes to film language, just CGI and related tech.
unless something goes horribly wrong, he won't.DrForester said:... what if Sculli hates it?
Don't. It's not worth it. Because you'll just feel sorry for not seeing it in theaters....on the Imax. Glorious!Zeliard said:Jesus @ GAF's enormous love for Speed Racer.
Maybe I need to see that movie.
Did you not see the movie? They did some really cool stuff with melting time and space together and manipulating them within shots. First thing I thought of while watching the Casa Cristo sequence was that it was that the Wachowskis had figured out exactly how Battle Angel's motorball sequences should be shot, and less literally every other action scene. That space/time bending would be perfect for capturing the way Battle Angel Alita can spend 3 pages depicting one move during a fight while maintaining all its kinetic energy.Zophar said:That's a really nebulous concept, I'd love to hear how you feel the Wachowskis have changed film language.
shintoki said:Don't. It's not worth it. Because you'll just feel sorry for not seeing it in theaters....on the Imax. Glorious!
Zeliard said:Jesus @ GAF's enormous love for Speed Racer.
Maybe I need to see that movie.
It's ranked up there with Braveheart and Casino Royale on the AVS chart. So yes, absolutely. :lolZeliard said:Fawkers.
Is the Blu-Ray hot?
Okay, that makes sense. I'm not trying to be argumentative or anything so thanks for indulging my question.Dan said:Did you not see the movie? They did some really cool stuff with melting time and space together and manipulating them within shots. First thing I thought of while watching the Casa Cristo sequence was that it was that the Wachowskis had figured out exactly how Battle Angel's motorball sequences should be shot, and less literally every other action scene. That space/time bending would be perfect for capturing the way Battle Angel Alita can spend 3 pages depicting one move during a fight while maintaining all its kinetic energy.
I'm not knocking Cameron for this, his techniques work great for most things, but he has very little interest in anything but an omniscient and traditional perspective on his film's subjects. Other projects demand different tools.
Zeliard said:Fawkers.
Is the Blu-Ray hot?
...then successful troll will be successful.DrForester said:... what if Sculli hates it?
I don't love it but I certainly don't think its an enormous pile of shit like some people would say because then I wouldn't know what to call Transformers 2.Zeliard said:Jesus @ GAF's enormous love for Speed Racer.
Maybe I need to see that movie.
jett said:It's a straight digital transfer, so it looks pretty unbelievable.
But you really missed out on something by skipping the movie when it was in theaters.
jett said:on a side note: I can hardly stand film grain anymore, I wish all directors would jump to HD digital cameras.![]()
Thinking about this statement for a second. It explains the whole theater scene in Inglorious Basterds doesn't it.Zeliard said:I think I just heard a growl from Quentin Tarantino. :lol
kIdMuScLe said:wtf is this melting space/time continuum shit in speed racer??? i don't remember any of that unless you are talking about the slo-mo shots?
There's a brilliant transition shot right when the Casa Cristo race moves into the desert environment that handles the whole spacial and temporal transition within one shot while simultaneously giving a villain a 'talking head' shot. The Casa Cristo race was the highlight for these techniques in the film, though they were used elsewhere too, but it was integral to that race.kIdMuScLe said:wtf is this melting space/time continuum shit in speed racer??? i don't remember any of that unless you are talking about the slo-mo shots?