SPOILERS, unmarked, etc.
I didn't realize this was out, thought sherlock holmes was the same week for some reason. When I realized, I saw there was a showing in 10 minutes at my local theater, checked that it was RealD (it is), then went. Just got back.
Random thoughts as I collect myself, then I'll read the thread.
The opening 15 minutes were, well, pretty bad. Caricature after caricature as they set things up with the military guys and the scientists, who are both annoying and dumb while making fun of each other as annoying and dumb. I shouldn't be surprised, since James Cameron is not a great writer and he lives off this sort of stuff (see: Aliens in particular).
After it settled in (and it sure settled in with that 3 hour running time) they toned down the annoying bits and found new slightly less annoying bits. So, if you've ever seen those made-for-3d IMAX short films they're usually about hitting you over the head with how cool you're supposed to think they are. Actually, I saw James Cameron's deep sea 3d imax spectacle, and there were more reaction shots of the people being amazed at what they're seeing than what they're actually seeing. This can be a problem in the IMAX short films, and there's some carryover here. Not in reaction shots, but in the director being a little overeager with "AWESOME" playing really loudly in his head as he's designing these sequences. You're supposed to be swept up in the wonder of it all and be amazed over and over again, and that it's merely cool makes it fall flatter than it would've if they just played it straight. If you get my meaning there. But it's not a huge problem; Cameron doesn't go overboard. More of a niggle in the background here and there.
Pandora. Not necessarily living up to its full potential. I mean, I was in Kauai a couple weeks ago and it's about equal with Pandora visually, so they should've tried a little harder for something unique and stunning with their limitless magic CG powers. The art direction grew on me a little over the course of the film, but it's pretty generic, from the environments (as mentioned, been there done that crossed with like Final Fantasy X) to the space cat people and space panthers and space birds. Now they were of course going for a level of familiarity that the audience could connect to, but there was just nothing of interest there aesthetically.
The CG in general...well, it's good. It's good enough that I wasn't distracted by things feeling out of place or disconnected or artificial, good enough that I could get into what was going on and the scenes with human Sam Worthington were where I felt disconnected. I think they leveraged that pretty well with the paralysis vs freedom of the main character.
The 3d...Avatar doesn't change my mind about it. Just like the last one I saw, Up, it starts out feeling really awkward and a little impressed for the first 45-60 minutes, then I forget it's even there and I'm not sure that it conveys anything more so than 2d film. It's cool, but it's a gimmick in its current form. Motion resolution seems to be a problem, with those running towards the camera scenes or any sort of fast movement with significant depth not seeming to have much resolution going on. It just looks weird. It also lends itself to feeling uneven, with some scenes trying for a lot of pop and some staying mostly flat. The transition can be a little jarring. As far as the jarring transition of going into the 3d mode of the film itself, I don't think that'll really go away entirely until the technology improves, maybe until no glasses are required for the effect and the depth feels more real. We'll see.
Back to the story and all that. It gets the basics down pretty well, like I said after the story settles in it's fine and a fun ride to the conclusion. There's also zero quick cut shaky cam thank you James Cameron for not being a moron unlike 99% of hollywood. You could argue CG movie in this case, but it's also his general style. So, yeah, some props for that, and the action, what there is in terms of proper stuff, is pretty good. There isn't all that much of it, though, aside from the final set piece. The rest is more "oh shit adventure" sort of fare as blue Sam Worthington learns the ropes, which is fine and suits the film and keeps it flowing.
The romance angle. Hum. It's pretty...brief? I mean, when it comes down to it his relationship with blue cat girl is really the thing that ties him to the Na'avi and Pandora and everything, it's what brings him to the other side and makes him fight for them. But the relationship-related stuff is about five minutes long, in a three hour film. Maybe it didn't focus test well, because when blue cat girl pushes the little bit of cloth aside and jumps on blue Sam Worthington's dick right there on camera in the forest and they get at it (PG-13, sheesh!) my audience broke out in very loud awkward laughter. Or maybe the CG related to them touching each other realistically was too expensive, I don't know; they did a hell of a job with that in the scenes where it was present, totally seamless with some sick close-up shots for good measure. But yeah, it takes a back seat to blue Sam Worthington exploring Pandora and hitting you over the head with as much cg as they could muster. That's fine, but maybe a more developed angle here would've made the film stronger in the long-term, when the "zomg cg zomg 3d" effect on Avatar's audience is long gone. Just a thought.
Okay, so blue Sam Worthington finds his spunky blue cat girl and they mate and become life partners in...three months, even though she knows he's just in a remote control body (...) and human Sam Worthington is really small in comparison and probably wouldn't be able to make her happy in bed (maybe with his leg...oh wait, paralyzed!). But we'll play that off as her knowing that somehow the Great Internet Tree would just be able to give him a permanent upload if it came to that. Sure, why not.
Great Tree Internet of Ghosts and Fiber Optic Cables. Okay. I kinda took issue with concept this when they introduced it, having the feeling of, "so murdering sentient aliens on their own planet and chopping down their lush rainforest home for space gold is sort of wrong, but that might not be enough for our Republican audience who probably have stock in Burn the Amazon Rainforest Ltd. They'll probably laugh at the forest deity, too, since there is obviously only Jesus our lord and savior and these stupid blue cat people should abandon their silly tree and go to church and use their constitutional rights to get some AR-15s." So instead of the Na'avi just having typical tribal spirituality stuff going on, they have the GREAT TREE INTERNET which totally legitimizes their faith and makes the evil space gold corporation even more evil for dismissing it. Yeah.
But that facilitates the perma-upload at the end, which brings us to another point. Sam Worthington's character is, for all intents, a WoW addict. He lets his real body atrophy, barely cares about eating, and plays the Blue Sam Worthington on the Cool Planet game all day long. The bad men want to cancel his subscription and he gets violent; he had an in-game wedding, after all, and has to go be with his Night Elf bride. Let's just leave it at that.
So to them, this alien guy in a remote controlled fleshpuppet becomes one of them in a whole three months, then five minutes later is a traitor, then he tames a really big bird and they lower their gazes in reverence. Kay. Speaking of, while they're bombarding us with lush full cg scene after cg scene, they could've done something with the big bird taming sequence. As in showing it, being that it's a pivotal moment for Sam Worthington's character. No excuses about there already being one, since it's under vastly different circumstances. Minor annoyance though, I'll accept that as an excuse, it's just that this is a spectacle flick.
While I'm nitpicking a little, I was a little underwhelmed with blue Sam Worthington's fight with blue warrior guy for alpha manliness cred. Considering warrior guy beats like 10 armed marines in close quarters in slow motion later on before biting quite a few bullets, blue Sam Worthington does a little three hit combo and takes care of him easily in their duel. Lame! Had he used some sick modern CQC moves to show him up it could've been a badass scene, but instead it's nothing in particular and doesn't convey the sense that warrior guy is worthwhile in the least, just an angry native who's full of himself.
Some more nitpicking: the big battle. One thing I really don't care for is how movie battle set pieces can often only seem to operate with one side completely winning 100% at any given time. So it starts out and the Na'avi kick ass and are totally fine and no Na'avi are dying, and then it instantly shifts and it's *just* Na'avi dying while the military guys unload on them, and then all the animals come out and it shifts back 100% in the other direction. You can see it in the LotR movies, too. I don't care for it, do a better job conveying the momentum of a battle, k?
So lots of people and People die and we get to the real battle, blue Sam Worthington vs Colonel Evil. He's in full caricature mode from the time things go hot on Pandora, and he gets in his mech and does his final boss thing here at the end. They establish blue Sam Worthington being able to survive this epic fall earlier in the film, and ends up working fairly well if a little predictably, just with a cool roll and hop at the end in a moment of badassery.
The badassery continues as blue Sam Worthington duels Colonel Evil's mech in hand to robot combat....but, despite this being a cool scene overall, I was pretty miffed at how he was parrying and blocking these attacks from the mech's melee weapon head on. I'm sorry, but it's a MECH, and with the hard time blue cat girl had with carrying blue Sam Worthington when he logged off WoW in front of the bulldozer, the Na'avi aren't extraordinarily physically strong. It's a mech. You can't "lock swords" with a damn MECH if you're relatively person-powered. Took me out of the scene somewhat.
And then it ends. The evil space gold corporation goes to the rainforest concentration camp and then gets booted back to future dystopiearth where they're stuck with computer internet instead of space tree internet. Their loss! And Sam Worthington dies, oh, except he saw 2001: A Space Odyssey effects (just like in the remote control bed!) so his soul was transferred through the tree fiber optics and there are no lingering philosophical questions, I guess. Hrmph!
Well then. I certainly don't usually spend two hours typing up movie impressions when I get back from the theater, so Avatar has probably succeeded. It doesn't do everything right by any stretch, it uses a lot of annoying tropes and it's somewhat unbalanced and the extremely one dimensional characters very much take a back seat to the attempt at mesmerizing us with the full potential of CG, but there's nothing there that's quite enough to seriously harm the experience aspect of it. Yeah, I liked it. It's not anywhere near film of the year (Inglourious), but it's comfortable on the top 10 for what it brings to the table (not writing, that's for sure). Cameron may be senile but he's still capable of a good flick.
Hope you made it through the poorly written two hours of stream of consciousness impressions with your brain intact, but I like doing this sort of thing sometimes when the experience is fresh and before I get too analytical about it, done in the vein of a casual conversation. If I'm hitting on things that everyone else is, oh well, since I haven't read the thread at all yet (will do so now).