CassidyIzABeast
Member
where's the james cameron prints money gif?
DanielPlainview said:also when is it estimated that Avatar will pass $402 million domestically? Just doing some data calculation..
Ok let me rearrange my wording. Avatar is by all means a sci-fi movie that *should* only appeal to a niche amount of people. But America has proved in spades that everyone's a nerd at heart.DanielPlainview said:I love Avatar and one of it's biggest supporters, but it isn't a "smart" movie.
DanielPlainview said:also when is it estimated that Avatar will pass $402 million domestically? Just doing some data calculation..
By next weekend, Cameron's comeback will hit the $400 million mark and by next Sunday, it should pass Michael Bay's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen to become the highest-grossing movie of 2009, as well as breaking into the Top 10 highest-grossing movies (domestically) of all time.
DanielPlainview said:also when is it estimated that Avatar will pass $402 million domestically? Just doing some data calculation..
DanielPlainview said:some people are saying 17, some saying 19 and some saying it took 21 days to hit $1 billion. Which is it?
TacticalFox88 said:Ok let me rearrange my wording. Avatar is by all means a sci-fi movie that *should* only appeal to a niche amount of people. But America has proved in spades that everyone's a nerd at heart.
You're reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much into it.TacticalFox88 said:Ok let me rearrange my wording. Avatar is by all means a sci-fi movie that *should* only appeal to a niche amount of people. But America has proved in spades that everyone's a nerd at heart.
I can see where your coming from, I just thought because of the genre itself it shouldn't have done so well. But then again, I'm didn't think the film would go pass 600 WW so I guess my crow is served.duckroll said:Why would you say that? The only barrier Avatar ever had, was that the Navi designs were a real turn off in all promotional material and trailers. They looked stupid and dumb. Outside of that, everything in the story screamed BIG ADVENTURE FOR THE WHOLE FAMILY. I was a huge doubter of the commercial aspects of the movie because of the marketing of the film and the designs, but never once did I question the potential appeal of the actual scenario. It's a big action adventure on a lush alien world, it's PG-13, and it's by a master action filmmaker. How is that niche?
DanielPlainview said:I love Avatar and one of it's biggest supporters, but it isn't a "smart" movie.
TacticalFox88 said:I can see where your coming from, I just thought because of the genre itself it shouldn't have done so well. But then again, I'm didn't think the film would go pass 600 WW so I guess my crow is served.
:lolryutaro's mama said:I like how Cameron walks away from Hollywood for 12 years and during that time, no one really challenges Titantic's position.
In 12 years.
He comes back and rings up a cool billion in his first movie back.
In just 17 days--the same amount of time it would have taken for the Space Marines to be declared missing.
Jimmy was sending us code back in 1986.
Vic said:I wish you guys would stop saying this.
-He took a break after making a $1.8B box-office success;
-He apparently took a break to wait & see the CGI technological advancements for his next features films (Avatar and Battle Angel, not sure about that on though);
-He keep shooting stuff (documentaries), participate in audio-visual projects (with the NASA). Developed the 3D tech used with Avatar with his deep ocean documentaries.
This is not what I call a break from movie making.
shintoki said::lol
I really think the high prices are pushing the revenue for this movie in ways no other movie had a chance to prior. Not to mention natural ticket price progression. Box Office Mojo is showing Titanic's year was at 4.69. While it is 7.19 for this year. Add on the 3$ surplus charge for 3D, and the inclusion of Imax Theaters which really didn't have much of a presence till recently outside of Museums and such. Fair chance Avatar's average ticket price is over 10$ Well over 100% higher. For sheer volume pushed, I don't think it is nearly as impressive as Titanic.
Speevy said:So how do you reckon that works out for a movie that it almost entirely about visual spectacle?
Avatar's 3rd weekend is $28m larger than the all-time record January opening weekend.DanielPlainview said:thanks! just checking my facts. Going to write up a post of all the heavy ownage...any more facts you guys want me to throw in there? So far this is what I have:
- Avatar made an estimated $68.3 million at the domestic BO in it's third weekend, crushing the previous record of $45 million set by Spider-Man 3.
- James Cameron will hold the #1 and #2 spots at the worldwide box office by the end of the week.
- irfan over at the NeoGAF forums also did some compiling in terms of how long it took the top 5 grossers to hit the $1 billion mark. This is what he found:
1. Titanic took 11 weeks (final: $1.84 billion)
2. LOTR: Return of the King took 10 weeks (final: $1.12 billion)
3. Pirates of the Caribean: Dead Man's Chest took 10 weeks (final: $1.07 billion)
4. Avatar took 17 days (current total: $1.02 billion)
5. The Dark Knight only hit it with the small Janurary re-release, making just a hair over $1 billion.
- The #1 2009 domestic grosser (so far) Transformers Revenge of the Fallen took 114 days to hit $402 million. Avatar will surpass that by next weekend (21 days).
Anything else?
TacticalFox88 said:A science fiction movie that has no ties to any existing franchise at all, made by a man that hasn't made a film in 12 years just made $1 billion worldwide....this is not normal. But man is the crow so sweet. Phoenix has got to be crying now.
And we would be (mostly) right.koam said:Oh please, if we go by that logic then Gone With the Wind is #1, not Titanic.
Timbuktu said:I am skeptical about it being the 'savior' of cinema though and a bit worried about what studios would take away from this.
GhaleonEB said:Avatar's 3rd weekend is $28m larger than the all-time record January opening weekend.
It's also the largest 3rd weekend ever, by $23m.
At this point it's not just breaking records, it's breaking them by just absurd margins.
Seventeen. BTW, this weekend gross is pretty ridiculous, I was expecting $60m, not $70m. I'll wait until the Monday drop to say anything for sure, but Titanic may be in sight after all.DanielPlainview said:some people are saying 17, some saying 19 and some saying it took 21 days to hit $1 billion. Which is it?
I know, the first list is better however, people are comparing Avatar's numbers to Titanic being on top which is list #2. If you're going to compare it to list #2, then you don't bitch about inflated prices.Chichikov said:And we would be (mostly) right.
Compare these two lists -
(list 1 and list 2)
Do you really find the second list better?
And I'm not talking about which list have better movies, but what list better represents the biggest blockbusters in history.
(mind you, this is only adjusted for inflation and ticket price, not population growth).
Chichikov said:And we would be (mostly) right.
Compare these two lists -
- Gone with the Wind
- Star Wars
- The Sound of Music
- E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial
- The Ten Commandments
- Titanic
- Jaws
- Doctor Zhivago
- The Exorcist
- Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
- Titanic
- The Dark Knight
- Star Wars
- Shrek 2
- E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial
- Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
- Spider-Man
- Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
- Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
Do you really find the second list better?
And I'm not talking about which list have better movies, but what list better represents the biggest blockbusters in history.
(mind you, this is only adjusted for inflation and ticket price, not population growth).
shintoki said:I wonder how much money is Cameron making from this? Is it a pay check or a %, a deal like the Hangover Director got.
duckroll said:I don't think Cameron cares about how much he is making from this as much as he cares about how much more money he will be able to get to make his next movie. He's already a very wealthy man, so he could probably afford to make movies for free for the rest of his life as long as he gets the insane budget from Fox to do whatever he wants to do.
Why the HELL would you need a 1B dollar budget? Shit, I couldn't think of anything that would cost that much. Or even a reason why.Vic said:Cameron to be the first director to be given a $1B dollars budget for a movie?
Stay tuned!
TacticalFox88 said:Why the HELL would you need a 1B dollar budget? Shit, I couldn't think of anything that would cost that much. Or even a reason why.
There was a time when a $100m budget was unthinkable.TacticalFox88 said:Why the HELL would you need a 1B dollar budget? Shit, I couldn't think of anything that would cost that much. Or even a reason why.
duckroll said:Why rely on CG effects to create alien worlds, when you can use genetic engineering to MAKE an alien world in a huge sound stage floating in space!![]()
UnluckyKate said:Just go and shoot the movie on the Moon.
UnluckyKate said:Just go and shoot the movie on the Moon.
There was a time when a $100m budget was unthinkable.
koam said:Don't give Cameron ideas..
Coincidence? I think not :lolkoam said:Don't give Cameron ideas..
T2 was the first to cost over $100m :lol
Neither list is perfect, you're obviously not doing a totally fair comparisons either way.StoOgE said:And yet most of the older movies didn't have cable TV, home video and video games to compete against. Several of those movies didn't even have TV to compete against.. or as many movies releasing.
OH zoe the things I'd do to you....DanielPlainview said:![]()
so cool!