subversus said:wait, hexcore is 6 cores? I thought that would be 8 cores.

Six cores? How big is this thing gonna be? lol
And the 2GB of RAM rage in this thread is glorious.
subversus said:wait, hexcore is 6 cores? I thought that would be 8 cores.
Majanew said:MS wants Xbox to be the go to box for whatever you want to do. Not including the HD disc standard is foolish.
at E3 '05 the 6800 was the fastest nvidia card........Rad Agast said:Not true, it was comparable to a 7700 in performance. That's what I remember from a long thread at B3D at the time.
Majanew said:MS wants Xbox to be the go to box for whatever you want to do. Not including the HD disc standard is foolish.
Well, Steve Ballmer couldn't shut up one time and said Blu-ray is coming to Xbox.Mizzou Gaming said:Yeah well I'll believe it when I see it. I've been guaranteed a Blu-Ray drive was coming to the 360 a bizillion times too ever since Blu-Ray ousted HD-DVD. The fact is Microsoft didn't need Blu-Ray this gen and I guarantee they don't want to use it next gen.
You mean like they already paid Sony to use DVD? Much like Sony pay Microsoft to use any number of technologies.Globox_82 said:Doubt they are going to use blu ray. And pay Sony for every disc they sell?
How is having twice as many cores and twice as much RAM good for Wii U? This news assures that Wii U will not have better support than Wii. Seems like MS's goal is to max-out hype before Wii U is even truly unveiled.Bluemercury said:A console with dual gpu??? riiigghhttt......still the rest is good news for WiiU
Physical sales are still too great. Streaming is being held back in the States. And MS said themselves they want you never turning the Xbox off. There's a format available to put games on and have the latest blockbuster movie playable, too. Options, man. Buy HD movies and having them stuck on Microsoft's HDD sucks.Globox_82 said:Again that didn't prevent them from dominating NA (vs Sony) and doing great in Pal market.
Japan wouldn't have supported them anyways.
Everything is going "stream". this is not 2001 anymore.
Why? What are the components of the WiiU?Bluemercury said:A console with dual gpu??? riiigghhttt......still the rest is good news for WiiU
Okay, after reading through the French, the title now correctly reflects the entire rumor unless I'm rusty.ThoseDeafMutes said:EDIT:
Was there a title change?
Drkirby said:2GB of DDR3 Ram? Really? Come on Microsoft, you can get 8GB right now for $50USD, that amount of Ram will really bottle neck the system, unless they have a ton of Video Ram on top of it.
Majanew said:And the thread title needs edited. The Xboxygen rumor said the 2GB RAM was for the CPU and they couldn't get word on how much RAM the GPU has. Making it sound like it should have its own.
Foliorum Viridum said:I'm really worried about underpowered consoles next gen![]()
DieH@rd said:PC ram comes on a stick, console ram must be fused directly into a motherboard. That brings whole shitstorm of complications.
1.) GDDR3 isn't inherently faster than DDR3.Nuclear Muffin said:Does not compute. DDR3 is absolute shit for a new console (the 360 uses GDDR3!)
I would expect nothing less than GDDR5 in a new console in 2012.
Foliorum Viridum said:I'm really worried about underpowered consoles next gen![]()
Yeah but that's not saying much, is it?subversus said:don't worry, they will be better than the ones we have.
Nirolak said:I am kind of wondering why they would go back to split RAM, which is what this rumor implies.
I also think CES is wrong, and dual GPUs is kind of an odd choice, which makes me question the rest.
deathkiller said:I think that he refers to the 6800, the Nvidia deal was announced much before the PS3 launch and before the 7700/7800s were on the market so the comparison was with two 6800.
Foliorum Viridum said:Yeah but that's not saying much, is it?
After such a ridiculously long generation I expect a huge step up. Anything less will be a failure in terms of hardware, in my eyes.
I'm sure he was the one to get it up to two from one. However I very much doubt the rumor. I would be shocked if the new Xbox had more than four cores and I don't know what they mean by two AMD GPU's but assuming its two cores its believable.Chittagong said:Cliffy B, get on it! we need 4GB. Do your magic.
Tim Sweeney and/or CliffyB (I forget which) was talking about making graphics code that scaled across a lot of cores.subversus said:Patrick Bach was talking about next consoles featuring dual GPU setups. I think DICE knows...
subversus said:don't worry, they will be better than the ones we have.
I don't expect any next gen system to use a split memory pool. I'm sure there won't be any VRAM, outside of maybe a few MB eDRAM.BurntPork said:The VRAM is probably 2GB GDDR5. Does that make everyone happy?
Globox_82 said:Doubt they are going to use blu ray. And pay Sony for every disc they sell? More like proprietary technology. WiiU will do the same
Me too, but that doesn't mean I'll be happy with it.subversus said:I'll take any improvement over what we have now.
slowclap.pngBurntPork said:How is having twice as many cores and twice as much RAM good for Wii U? This news assures that Wii U will not have better support than Wii. Seems like MS's goal is to max-out hype before Wii U is even truly unveiled.
Foliorum Viridum said:Me too, but that doesn't mean I'll be happy with it.
I don't expect it to rival my PC, but I want it to be able to flex its muscles pretty well. I know consoles don't need as much power as PCs because devs like Naughty Dog etc can squeeze ridiculous amounts out of it, but yeah.
If we're still playing games in 720p in 2012 onwards it will be a joke.
Not many though. Hell, I bet a few games you play are sub-720p.subversus said:It's good. And I'm playing games in 1080p right now.
We've basically confirmed a Wii-like jump in power in the speculation thread. That means Wii-like support.blu said:slowclap.png
That flew right over your head, huh?Foliorum Viridum said:Not many though. Hell, I bet a few games you play are sub-720p.
Not to mention made by AMD, imagine the heat lolhteng said:wow 2 GPUs?! can't imagine the cost and power draw
Nirolak said:Tim Sweeney and/or CliffyB (I forget which) was talking about making graphics code that scaled across a lot of cores.
Six CPUs and two GPUs would actually make sense for fitting that.