Interceptor
Banned
the irony only Arab welcomed you after WW2 now you occupy them and killing them.
The scary thing is: People actually believe that.
the irony only Arab welcomed you after WW2 now you occupy them and killing them.
so you twist
ISIS attacked only the faction against Assad aka FSA and others and never shot a bullet against Iran that's the ground facts .so let us be real.
Care to give an evidence? Cuz it seems like a wild assumption. specially with ISIS attacks in SA ( last one killed many soldiers) so why would they support them?
ignorance is a bliss
List of countries named after people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_named_after_people
guess what america is with them
How does this add up with the commonly circulated figure of 4m refugees?
I mean, in these arguments people often overlook that neighboring countries like Jordan or Lebanon have been receiving a lot of refugees, but it strains credulity to imagine that somehow SA got 2.5m out of these 4m and somehow did it under everyone's radar.
(Not that I'd wish for these poor people to end up in SA anyway)
How about you get real and study some facts, Iran lost several IRGC soldiers and some of them high ranking officers in Iraq fighting ISIS. You know why ISIS can carry out attacks in Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iran? Because they can easily find local help and refuge in the KSA.
Why wouldn't they? ISIS and the KSA are theologically and ideologically one and the same, practicing the same form of extremism known as Wahabism which was identified by the European parliament in 2013 as the main source of global terror.
The only difference is the head of the state, the Kingdom cuts more heads and hands off than ISIS. Many in the KSA support ISIS out of ideological and theological belief, they have given Al Baghdadi their loyalty, or Bai'a in Arabic, and would love to see him as Caliph instead of the the current king they have.
http://www.newstatesman.com/world-a...-arabia-exported-main-source-global-terrorism
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/06/saudi-arabia-anxious-ideological-links-isis
http://i100.independent.co.uk/artic...or-the-government-of-saudi-arabia--xy1pn8xX4x
Djibouti is named after a Egyptian Moon God? The More you know
and to the other point it would've been uber cool to just call the country the Kingdom of Arabia
"They all look the same to me, so they must support each other!" Really?! And the last part shows how you know nothing about SA.
"They all look the same to me, so they must support each other!" Really?! And the last part shows how you know nothing about SA.
don't bother man,he is ignorant and uncivilized
Who are you referring to with that last part? I'm honestly confused.will they ended in SA and nothing but easy life you on the other hand cant say the same many videos in youtube says otherwise and paint disgusting mentality and savage act.
it is not up to you.
Who are you referring to with that last part? I'm honestly confused.
Yeah because that's exactly what I said, never mind the actual wahabbi link between the two, did you even bother reading the articles or studies? Of course not, I don't even know why I bother. So many Wahabbi apologists... There wouldn't even be any ISIS or AlQuaeda without the theological and ideological basis for them which originates in Saudi Arabia and still holds ground there.
"They all look the same to me, so they must support each other!" Really?! And the last part shows how you know nothing about SA.
you can't judge a whole country with the actions of a few
this goes for all sides.... There were good Hungarian citizens who provided food and supplies to those people who were rejected by the Hungarian government
This thread is bring out a lot of the stupid.
Except this is exactly what you said. Correct me if I'm wrong but your only evidence that SA supports ISIS is that you think they look alike.
Man that is hard to watch.
and it is only this time the whole world at fault.
if only we brought down Assad soon no Isis or Hezbollah will be in syria.
What? No it is because of the same ideological foundation the two entities share, second of all because of history where the KSA funded and armed Al Quaeda in Afghanistan, third because of all the talk about KSA confronting ISIS they have done nothing outside their borders to do so and have bashed the Iraqi militias for attacking ISIS strongholds.
If their ideology is deemed as a world source of terror by the EU, who am I to argue, but you didn't even bother to read any article I linked.
Or maybe we should stop messing with other countries, support only pacifist groups, and stop sending weapons to rebel groups that turn out to be a bigger evil that the one we were orignally fighting against.
Or maybe we should stop messing with other countries, support only pacifist groups, and stop sending weapons to rebel groups that turn out to be a bigger evil that the one we were orignally fighting against.
Well Israel wouldn't exist and most of the Jews would be ash. So if you're Jewish it would likely be a good deal worseSaudi is a shit country, Israel is a shit country, Europe is shit, U.S is the devil.
let's just implode and hit the reset button.
We all suck as humans and we ruined this world for us and for all the next generations.
Sometimes I even contemplate what if the other side won WW2? Can we even be at a worse situation than now?
and it is only this time the whole world at fault.
if only we brought down Assad soon no Isis or Hezbollah will be in syria.
Saudi is a shit country, Israel is a shit country, Europe is shit, U.S is the devil.
let's just implode and hit the reset button.
We all suck as humans and we ruined this world for us and for all the next generations.
Sometimes I even contemplate what if the other side won WW2? Can we even be at a worse situation than now?
So, if I'm parsing your initial post correctly, you're telling me that:
So, if I'm parsing your initial post correctly, you're telling me that:
A) they're better off in SA than Europe because of Hungary?
B) you're somehow associating me with these Hungarian reactions? Do we know each other or were you just whatabouting to defend SA's stellar human rights record?
A) yes there are better in KSA and they are welcome any time and it boggle my mind how those less than 250.000 want to be there.
B) the videos about refuges in EU .next time at least bother watching more than the first one.
A. Well yeah, as long as they're religious men, I guess.A) yes there are better in KSA and they are welcome any time and it boggle my mind how those less than 250.000 want to be there.
B) the videos about refuges in EU .next time at least bother watching more than the first one.
A. Well yeah, as long as they're religious men, I guess.
B. Or don't make oblique posts with a vague accusatory "you" and clearly state what you mean, ie that you believe Europeans are overall so unwelcoming that a hereditary theocracy that condemns journalists to lashings, holds public beheadings and cuts thieves' hands would be seen more welcoming.
I'm not sure refugees fleeing ISIS would be super on board with this program. They might even be willing to take a chance with our xenophobic shitheads.
Edit: yeah, what Buzzman said.
'Pacifist groups'. :lol
Some people here are just too sheltered sometimes.
Glad to learn you support ISIS.
don't bother man,he is ignorant and uncivilized
You mean like the United Kingdom of Great Britain? Their monarchy isnt in control but they are "legit".
Don't backseat mod me, dude. If you're unhappy with the turn this conversation is taking, feel free to ask a mod to tell me to shut up or ban me, but you don't get to start an argument and then complain when it doesn't go your way.2.5 million disagree with you.
what is up with you we are discussing refugee problems not a religious debate
don't derail the thread please stick to the subject
Yeah, I'm very sceptical about this claim. Lots of Western media saying the opposite.
Don't backseat mod me, dude. If you're unhappy with the turn this conversation is taking, feel free to ask a mod to tell me to shut up or ban me, but you don't get to start an argument and then complain when it doesn't go your way.
I am discussing the 2.5m claim when I say it's surprising, if not doubtful, when I'm supposed to believe out of 4m refugees, 2.5 ended up in a place with one of the worst Human Rights record in the world. You took umbrage with that remark and decided to veer off the European xenophobia tangent. All I'm saying is that even accounting for the various xenophobic stances in Europe, I have a hard time imagining all these refugees would go to SA rather than Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey or yes, Eastern Europe.
SA's history with transparency doesn't help my disbelief.
Number of refugees Saudi Arabia has offered to take: 0
In other words, people are ignorant and prejudice and willing to make shit completely up to reinforce their hatred of a group of people.
KUDOS to Saudi Arabia for a giving a shit and proving people wrong.
Dude, you are 100% wrong. I'd suggest you to learn something about the region before posting something like that. Like a small but of history since '79. ME is a very complicated region.What? No it is because of the same ideological foundation the two entities share, second of all because of history where the KSA funded and armed Al Quaeda in Afghanistan, third because of all the talk about KSA confronting ISIS they have done nothing outside their borders to do so and have bashed the Iraqi militias for attacking ISIS strongholds.
If their ideology is deemed as a world source of terror by the EU, who am I to argue, but you didn't even bother to read any article I linked.
What a massive oversight by the humanitarian organisations of the world. Clearly this is the works of some racist and islamophobic agenda in play.
Either that, or, you know. SA is lying. Which given it's history and current state of affairs is a probability I consider higher than UNHCR slipping up and miscounting 2,5 million refugees from Syria.
apparently a 700 million dollar investment to these camps...