• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Say, how is Napster-To-Go?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grimlock

Member
I bounced by the Napster site due to curiosity about their little deal running with Napster-To-Go and saw that my H320 was compatible with it. Is there a limit on the number of songs you can d\l for the To-Go service? Are all songs available for it, or are there exclusions? How bloated is the Napster client? How easy is it to re-rip the songs?
 

Chipopo

Banned
Woah, so lets say I subscribe for Napster's 30 day trial and then drop my subscription.....all of the songs I've downloaded to my MP3 player are removed? How is that even possible?
 

aaaaa0

Member
Pfft. People pay $10/month for XM Satellite Radio.

$14.95/month for a customizable music service where I can download unlimited songs to an MP3 player ain't a bad deal in my opinion, even if the songs have to be renewed every 30 days or they stop playing.
 

Chipopo

Banned
I can't imagine someone who wanted to accumulate a substantial music library ever using this service. Thinking forward; what happens if Napster isn't succesful? What happens if you want to move to another format as technology expands? What if you plan on being away from your USB port for more then a month because you're doing something crazy like travel? It's way too iffy. I'd gladly pay extra for music that I own and can do whatever I please with.
 

Pellham

Banned
I guess it's for people who don't care about saving music and like listening to new stuff constantly...

I wouldn't use it.
 

marko

Member
Chipopo said:
I can't imagine someone who wanted to accumulate a substantial music library ever using this service. Thinking forward; what happens if Napster isn't succesful? What happens if you want to move to another format as technology expands? What if you plan on being away from your USB port for more then a month because you're doing something crazy like travel? It's way too iffy. I'd gladly pay extra for music that I own and can do whatever I please with.

Right, it is not for people who want to acculate a substantial music library. And it is difficult see value in the service if you need to own the music. Me, I use the regular napster service, I love having a customizable selection of 1,000,000 songs or so to listen to at home/at work. I never purchased that many CDs in the past. To me, listening to music is a little more like watching a movie, I'll rent a movie once and watch it, and I'll buy the occasional movie I must have. Same with music, I'll purchase the occasional CD/online music I must have, and I rent the music through napster.
 

Grimlock

Member
Well, I've been mulling over this because buying several used CD's a month costs a bit more than this Napster service, and I don't really trust allofmp3 with my credit card a whole lot. Besides, my H320 does have a digital out-and my Audigy does have digital in...
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
It might be just me.. and while Im willing to pay for MP3's nowadays.. paying Napster for them just seems.. wrong.
 

btrboyev

Member
if you bought 10 or more songs you might as well have just bought the cd..your not saving any money, your just not getting off your ass to go to a record store to buy a superior version.
 

Phoenix

Member
btrboyev said:
if you bought 10 or more songs you might as well have just bought the cd..your not saving any money, your just not getting off your ass to go to a record store to buy a superior version.

I can assume that you have either accepted the FUD you've apparently been told or just never used iTMS.

Case Study: The Diary of Alicia Keys

Soung Count: 15
Cost per song: 0.99
Album Cost: 9.99
Actual Cost Per Song: 0.66

Amazon.com price: 13.49
Walmart Price: 13.38
BestBuy Price: 9.99


Mission Accomplished :)
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
btrboyev said:
if you bought 10 or more songs you might as well have just bought the cd..your not saving any money, your just not getting off your ass to go to a record store to buy a superior version.

Thats true, assuming you wanted the whole album
Or just order from amazon with cdnow

But, if you just want one song, 99 cents is a good deal
I just wish they used a higher quality bit rate.
 

btrboyev

Member
I can assume that you have either accepted the FUD you've apparently been told or just never used iTMS.

Case Study: The Diary of Alicia Keys

Soung Count: 15
Cost per song: 0.99
Album Cost: 9.99
Actual Cost Per Song: 0.66

Amazon.com price: 13.49
Walmart Price: 13.38
BestBuy Price: 9.99


Mission Accomplished

so your paying almost as much as the average for lower quality and not having a physical copy. nice.
 

Phoenix

Member
Your original hypothesis was incorrect. I'll deal with this one now.

There are 3 tracks that I want from that album. As such I've only spent 3 bucks as opposed to 10 or 14. If its an entire album that I want I can get it cheaper than the average price (9.99 is the low - not the average) and have it right now and have it burned for my trip into work tomorrow (under which I have a physical copy).
 

aaaaa0

Member
I follow the 90/10 rule.

90% of music is disposable trash that I just listen to in the background for a couple days or a week or two, and forget about. Napster rocks for this. I continually get a flow of new tunes, and Napster-To-Go means I can copy as many of those tracks to my portable MP3 player as I want for as long as I'm interested to listen to them.

When I get tired of the album, I toss it. Basically, I think of Napster as XM Radio, but I can listen to it on my MP3 player (ie anywhere and anytime), and I can choose exactly what I want to hear.

Napster makes sense if you normally go through at least 1-2 albums a month like this (which I do).

10% of music is actually good enough that I want to keep it forever. In this case, I'd rather not pay iTunes 99c a track for something that's compressed (AAC) and DRM copy protected. Instead, I'll just pay an extra couple bucks and buy the whole album in a store, and get the artwork, liner notes + lyrics, AND a nice unprotected physical CD (that I can rip and copy as much as I want).

So for the way I like my music, iTunes makes absolutely no sense to me. For other people iTunes is the better option.

Isn't choice grand?
 

CaptainABAB

Member
I agree with aaaa0

I use Rhapsody and to me, music is like cable+tivo. I want access to any song at any time and need new stuff all the time (not just new releases, but new artists I haven't discovered yet as well).

It also makes more sense if you spend as much time on a computer working as I do AND you listen to many genres of music.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom