Has the artist even played poker before? Kim Dotcom's "evidence" would be his cards, not his chips. I understand they wanted to show he had so much "evidence", but the entire idea falls apart because it doesn't make sense in terms of the inspiration it is drawn from.
I mean...do you understand poker?
Each side has their cards.
Dems have Russia and Reps have Seth Rich.
Kim has just raised the stakes with his 'Evidence' chips and there's no way the Dems can match that, so they're out.
Reps win.
EDIT:
The stupidity comes in choosing Poker as the metaphor, a game where you have a higher chance of winning the better at lying are.