Lt Pidgeon
Neo Member
I can't believe that no-one has used the "Diddy Oil" joke yet.
Kid Cudi talking about how Puff fire bombed his car, this happened after Diddy told Cassie he was going to blow up Cudi's car.
Me too. Rap culture has a strong taboo on snitching.I'm actually surprised Cudi took the stand.
He doesn't really have a choice. He could lie or say he doesn't know/doesn't recognize stuff/whatever but not like he can just refuse a subpoena.I'm actually surprised Cudi took the stand.
Seriously?I didn't know what astroglide was until this trial. Diddy just str8 up stole my innocence.
I'm not paying attention to the trial outside of here and random social media posts, but I'm not really seeing any solid evidence against him regarding the charges he is actually facing (from OP: Sean 'Diddy' Combs faces one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, and two counts of transporting for prostitution – all felonies.)
And a lot of the accusations of criminal behavior he's not being charged with, like the firebombed car, is getting a lot of testimony that's basically saying a car a damaged and I believe it was him.
I'm not saying he is innocent of anything, but is there any actual evidence supporting the actual charges or is this trial just being used to shame him? Or is he actually being charged with additional offenses and it just hasn't been mentioned?
Fitting that it has a cock in it...
I fully knew this layup was coming, but how about an answer?
I fully knew this layup was coming, but how about an answer?
And a lot of the accusations of criminal behavior he's not being charged with, like the firebombed car, is getting a lot of testimony that's basically saying a car a damaged and I believe it was him.
Corroborated witness testimony is "evidence"; in fact, it along with confessions are what get most people convicted of any crime. Something like DNA evidence, or videos, or anything like that are only ever present in a small percentage of trials.I'm not saying he is innocent of anything, but is there any actual evidence supporting the actual charges or is this trial just being used to shame him? Or is he actually being charged with additional offenses and it just hasn't been mentioned?
Deliberations almost complete
I already got my answer to this. I know witness testimony is evidence. The question was if any of the "evidence" was actually toward what they charged him with. Lots of testimony about him being a piece of shit and guilty of state level crimes (that aren't being charged here). Now to see if the jury feels those apply to the federal charges he is actually being tried for.Corroborated witness testimony is "evidence"; in fact, it along with confessions are what get most people convicted of any crime. Something like DNA evidence, or videos, or anything like that are only ever present in a small percentage of trials.
I didnt know what RICO was. Had to google it now.I didn't know that RICO was the one charge they were still discussing.
And celebrity. They live by different rules than the rest of us. What a shame...Money really will get you out of almost any problem.
that is just not true this kind of thing has destroyed a lot of celebritiesAnd celebrity. They live by different rules than the rest of us. What a shame...
Its all about the Benjamin's.Money really will get you out of almost any problem.
I mean, they should...So if he didn't coerce the women do they get charged with fucking prostitutes as well?
He is busy training to star as Balrog right now in the SF movie....but I could see him pull double duty as Hakan..."IT'S TIME TO OIL UP"
I'm confused why you don't think the testimony had anything to do with the sex trafficking charges. I think people fundamentally misunderstand those laws.I already got my answer to this. I know witness testimony is evidence. The question was if any of the "evidence" was actually toward what they charged him with. Lots of testimony about him being a piece of shit and guilty of state level crimes (that aren't being charged here). Now to see if the jury feels those apply to the federal charges he is actually being tried for.
So if he didn't coerce the women do they get charged with fucking prostitutes as well?
I don't think he's saying testimony doesn't matter but that it's hard to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt based on testimony alone.I'm confused why you don't think the testimony had anything to do with the sex trafficking charges. I think people fundamentally misunderstand those laws.
Wasn't enough for this jury though lol
I think he will be sentenced for at least a couple years, maybe up to 5. I doubt they'll slap him with the max of 10 years.So this guy is walking, right? After all that.