Really? Nobody? Nobody knew with 100% certainty perhaps, but it was well known that it was very likely they would, it's the only reason I watched that snooze fest
I think the price would have been even less well received if it was announced with iPhones, at least with this one they announced it with other 'Pro' products in the high price rangeWell, it also could've been set for when they announce the new iPhones.
Everyone knew Sony would release a new PSVR headset. Nobody knew if Apple would've announce a headset at this time.
And that's what VR needs.
300% isn't really much of an increase considering it's a reveal announcement tbh. (only a 3x increase)
Kinda funny how apple gets hype for doing even less than the competition (only "feature" was 2D screens & pinch to zoom), but that's apple marketing for ya.
Man, I would like to see if you tell your boss that a 300% salary increase isn’t really that muchIt's only a 3x increase on normal VR searches.
That's a pretty basic increase.
Maybe that 1.5m BOA estimated was the low end, and it could sell even more than that the first year. Maybe all of us just can't see it, but all the casuals can.
$2000 or more will soon be the standard price for VR headsets in the near future I guess. Crazy week.
im convinced Draxon is Eddie lol
No one is better at making ppl want something they don't need. Apple sold AR/VR better than anyone else. They are so good at selling and conveying an idea/concept to regular ppl, they make it so easily digestible. But also... 300% really isn't that much, right?
I personally don't understand the hate for the thing and the price. If that $3500 price tag is "too much" for you, then it's not for you. It's just not worth it for you right now. Not every product is for you and there are alternatives.They will make an affordable one eventually. Is a G-Wagon for me? No, I don't like the way it looks and I think it's overpriced. I personally think a Toyota equivalent is much better at 1/2 the price. Do I hate the G-Wagon? No. I know ppl love that thing, it's just not for me.
In all honesty, $3500 for that thing isn't all that bad. Would I buy it? No, I am not beta testing a new product for $3500. I'll wait for the 3rd iteration, when hopefully it's lighter more refined and more fleshed out.
I did say later that they are really good at conveying an idea/concept, probably the best at selling it. But you're right, don't need was a stretch, I'll steal your line for future use lolOf course it's Eddie and I'm glad he's back! Welcome back again Eddie.
The bolded isn't actually true. Apple does a great job at conveying to people why the need something that they didn't realize they'd want. People do want and need VR\AR devices, they just don't see the need yet. They don't understand how cool and useful it is.
I did say later that they are really good at conveying an idea/concept, probably the best at selling it. But you're right, don't need was a stretch, I'll steal your line for future use lol
It's true tho. I never knew I need a smart phone... until they sold me on it.
Wall of nonsense
People said this about Smartphones and etc too.There's literally a ZERO percent chance the bolded will be true.
Why are you blaming me for what the article says?Its bonkers you equate google searches for VR vocabulary and interest in what Apple's new product is with actual intetest in buying said product.
Apple literally spend a decade of R&D to come up with....
Floating screens.
Oh come on bunny, you can't be that blindly in love with this product to see that competitors WILL make a better product and it WILL be cheaper. Substantially cheaper. The apple tax is a real thing.
And yeah. It'll have a better feature set. Apple products have always been a limited gated off experience. This will be no different.
And to think apple and meta aren't doing the exact same thing is just marketing. Don't get so blindly enamoured by the marketing because your brain sees the words apple and you start drooling.
Shit, I'd say without the smoke and mirrors metas attempts are more interesting than the 2D screens that apple seemes obsessed with.
lazy gifs
So, you agree that competitors will make a cheaper, more full featured device, that will be compatible on more devices.
Good to see we're on the same page
The promise of vision itself seems to rely primary on it working with other apple products.... to do what exactly?
Gimmick conference calls with uncanny valley avatars? Browse websites with clunky gesture controls?
Is the killer feature really to view your mac or phone screen from the headset?
All these uses are less convenient than what they're trying to replace.
Shit, maybe one day apple will have a product that does something more than FLoatIng SCReeNs, but it seems like some people are ok with the bare minimum.
Looks like some people think only one person can make threads on fruit.
People said this about Smartphones and etc too.
Why are you blaming me for what the article says?
this is false.for that price i wanted to see if the headset would finger me as well. unfortunelty, it doesn't, so no buy,
This isn't even an argument because neither is the Vision Pro. The point was that plus $1000 phone became the norm for mainstream sales. Tablets as well, and Laptops basically need to be in that range too if you want to read gmail without system interrupts.But the average phone isn't bought for $2,000.