Support NeoGAF

[Jak140]

This thread has been done before in a much more hilarious fashion:
http://forums.gaming-age.com/showthread.php?t=4143

 

[bionic77]

I should clarify one thing I do consider a womens sexual past based on quality not quantity. If I know a girl has slept with a guy I consider a dirt bag I will pass. It's not how many its who. If rumor has it she has slept with 50 guys and I know none of them she is fair game. If however She has slept with one and it's my brother she's done for.

When you have reasonable skill you will find youself capable of landing (not sure of the word here) most/majority/you fair share of women. Does that mean sudenly they are all sluts. If she is easy for me to land does that make her a slut. Or is it only when she is easy for someone else?

It all depends on what you want, don't assume that everyone wants the same thing. Not every guy just wants to bang as many girls as possible. I personally don't feel comfortable getting intimate with someone unless I actually have some feelings for them. That is just me. I won't judge another person if they like to have a lot of sex, but I don't think there is anything wrong with my not wanting to be with girls who have been with a lot of other guys (or at the very least I sure as hell don't want to know about it).

Also, what someone said about the double standard is totally true, but in a way I think women are the ones who need to have restraint, because if you leave it up to the guy.........

 

[maharg]

When you have reasonable skill you will find youself capable of landing (not sure of the word here) most/majority/you fair share of women. Does that mean sudenly they are all sluts. If she is easy for me to land does that make her a slut. Or is it only when she is easy for someone else?

This is an interesting, and I think important, dillema that people who feel the way leguna does about the importance of how many a girl has slept with before should be aware of. Psychologically, a woman who will 'put out' for you in any reasonable amount of time (ie. before marriage) can become, in your mind, a slut. If she was willing to for you, why would you then believe her if she says she's only slept with 2 or 3 guys? Either your ego is insane or she's a slut, by the logic you're going on.

(not saying you think this way, darscot, just expanding on or reiterating your point)

 

[Tommie Hu$tle]

I won't judge another person if they like to have a lot of sex, but I don't think there is anything wrong with my not wanting to be with girls who have been with a lot of other guys (or at the very least I sure as hell don't want to know about it).

I think you anwsered your own fucking question.
Don't want to know about it don't ask. As long as she is with you right now who gives a fuck, what she or you did in the past. Live for today and tomorrow. Not yesterday.

Also, what someone said about the double standard is totally true, but in a way I think women are the ones who need to have restraint, because if you leave it up to the guy.........

I think that people should have restriant. Why should it be on her to stop you from acting like a dick. How come you can be man enough to stop yourself? That weaksause.

The way I see it a woman can do everything and anything that I like to do. When we are together then the rules for both of us should change. But, not until that point.

 

[bionic77]

I think you anwsered your own fucking question.
Don't want to know about it don't ask. As long as she is with you right now who gives a fuck, what she or you did in the past. Live for today and tomorrow. Not yesterday.



I think that people should have restriant why should it be on her to stop you from acting like a dick. How come you can be man enough to stop yourself? That weaksause.

Hey I think I for the most part I have had self-restaint (hey nobody is perfect!), this is just a generalization that I think might be true for the most part. It might not be either, I didn't claim it to be fact, just something I think is true.

And I agree with you about not asking about the past. I never really did ask about that, but in certain environments it is impossible not to know (like in high school, etc.). Hell, this doesn't concern me anymore anyways as I am engaged and I never asked about my fiance's past and she never asked about mine and I am happy with it staying that way.

 

[Tommie Hu$tle]

Hey I think I for the most part I have had self-restaint (hey nobody is perfect!), this is just a generalization that I think might be true for the most part. It might not be either, I didn't claim it to be fact, just something I think is true.

And I agree with you about not asking about the past. I never really did ask about that, but in certain environments it is impossible not to know (like in high school, etc.). Hell, this doesn't concern me anymore anyways as I am engaged and I never asked about my fiance's past and she never asked about mine and I am happy with it staying that way.

For the record when I said you I didn't mean bionic77 but, you as the person who has no control. In high school it is imossible TOO know if you ask me. There are so many young girls who are labeled slut or whore or skank or whatever for no reason at all but, because people are mean. Unless I fucked her myself I consider what I hear about someone pure bulloks. And if one my my Dudes are hitting it then I don't care anyways she is persona non grata to me.

 

[Manics]

Hey who changed my tag??

OK I admit I was "inspired" by that scene in Clerks. :lol

 

[Drinky Crow]

I like this Tommy Hu$tle fellow.

Sluts rock. In the best case -- at least, when they've put a few years of real life under their belts and aren't needy little twats dishing out the sex0r from peer pressure -- they know what they want and how to get it. More importantly, they know how to GET OFF and how to GET YOU OFF. Consider all the previous dudes training for the main event -- YOU. Respect!

 

[Saturnman]

The Crow did, it's what Mike Works is claiming at OAS.

 

[Lambtron]

I think there's a world of difference between a "slut" who fucks all the time because she likes to fuck, and a "slut" who fucks all the time because her dad hit her, or she's got low self-esteem, or she's pressured into it...

I'm in the minority amongst my peer group, because the thought of sex without some sort of pretty deep emotional connection is not one that I have ever, or would ever, entertain. That doesn't mean "I'm waiting until marriage!" It means that an emotional bond is a very important part of arousal for me. And it also doesn't mean that I'm going to pass judgement on all you "loose" people... that's me, you're you. I pick who I'll have sex with, you do the same, and everyone will be happy.

If a girl has so much experience that sex loses a lot of its enjoyment to her, then there would be an issue, but outside of that, whatever. That being said, I'm still more than open to saying a girl is dressed like a tramp or a harlot if that's the case. The brain is the largest erogenous zone, leave some to the imagination!

None of this matters, sex isn't something that should be taken super seriously. I mean, yeah, using protection, and getting tested, and worrying about contraceptives are important, but that actual act? Do you realize how ridiculous sex is? Have you seen the faces you make? Heard the sounds? Heard the shit you say? It's kind of hilarious, actually... it's not worth getting worked up over. It's a form of affection, not really all that much different from kissing or hugging. They're all good feelings, just in different ways. Make eachother feel good and have fun, don't worry about making up rules and regulations for where your does and does not tread.

 

[Ristamar]

... it's not worth getting worked up over. It's a form of affection, not really all that much different from kissing or hugging. They're all good feelings, just in different ways.

That might be oversimplifying it just a bit too much.

 

[Tommie Hu$tle]

I'm in the minority amongst my peer group, because the thought of sex without some sort of pretty deep emotional connection is not one that I have ever, or would ever, entertain. That doesn't mean "I'm waiting until marriage!" It means that an emotional bond is a very important part of arousal for me. And it also doesn't mean that I'm going to pass judgement on all you "loose" people... that's me, you're you. I pick who I'll have sex with, you do the same, and everyone will be happy.

I think that is very important to entertain. Again sex is always about what arouses you and emotional connection is a major part of that. I know for me sex has generally been better with people that I've cared about. But, at the same time these people that I've cared about would probably be defined as sluts in some of the views of these posters.

If a girl has so much experience that sex loses a lot of its enjoyment to her, then there would be an issue

Yeah but she doesn't have to be Little Miss Fucks-a-lot for sex to lose intrest to her.

The brain is the largest erogenous zone, leave some to the imagination!

+.5 Lambtron. I agree with the jist of what you are saying but, when it's time to get to fucking it's time to kick imagination out the door cause Mr. Reality is coming to play!

None of this matters, sex isn't something that should be taken super seriously. I mean, yeah, using protection, and getting tested, and worrying about contraceptives are important, but that actual act? Do you realize how ridiculous sex is? Have you seen the faces you make? Heard the sounds? Heard the shit you say? It's kind of hilarious, actually... it's not worth getting worked up over. It's a form of affection, not really all that much different from kissing or hugging. They're all good feelings, just in different ways. Make eachother feel good and have fun, don't worry about making up rules and regulations for where your does and does not tread.

+2 Lambton

1 for spelling ridiculous correctly
and
1 for realizing that sex really looks kinda retarded.

 

[DCharlie]

i'm sure some one else has mentioned it, but who the hell *given a choice* wants to sleep with a woman/man with limited/no sexual experience (actually, if it's a love thing, then it shouldn't matter... ) ?

"I want you to fix my car..... but i must insist that you've only ever fixed one before mine!"

 

[Folder]

Since when is this something that needs forgiveness? People that think like this baffle me? Like it or not sex is the most natural and normal thing there is. The is nothing wrong with sex!

But the idea of your girl getting down with someone inthe past is never nice...

 

[Tommie Hu$tle]

But the idea of your girl getting down with someone inthe past is never nice...

Well how do you think she feels thinging about all the chicks you banged? The idea of her banging some other dude while she is with me is never nice but, what she did before me and what she does after me is none of my concern.

 

[Folder]

Well how do you think she feels thinging about all the chicks you banged? The idea of her banging some other dude while she is with me is never nice but, what she did before me and what she does after me is none of my concern.

Yeah I know. It doesn't stop it from being a really horrible thought though...

 

[EviLore]

One late night I was staying up looking through some stories on Google News. One of the top links on a particular bit was some english-based chinese online news source (ChinaDaily I think). In my insomnia I check out the site and find that they have a forum containing a lot of young adults living in china. So I stay for a while and have a look at the topics they're discussing, and one in particular grabs my attention.

The topic's premise, if I recall, was a news article about a woman who was chased to a balcony of a building by an attempted rapist, and instead of being raped she jumped (don't remember the outcome, but let's presume she died). The thread starter then posed the question: if you're in a relationship with a woman, would you encourage her to take her own life rather than bear with the shame of losing her purity forever by being raped?

The hundreds of replies that followed showed a rather large subculture gap, with traditionalists encouraging notions of a woman's only value stemming from her purity, and the more western-idealed (for the lack of a better term) guys resenting that oulook and focusing on loving their partners and caring for them through a painful ordeal. The college girls that replied also definitely had something to say on the matter.

Now, if the question above were posed at GAF, the topic would probably be locked immediately, but though we don't have this sort of moral dilemma for the most part, we *do* still seem to have a lesser issue of "purity" under contention.

If the girl is cool, clean, encourages using the right protection, and won't go sleeping around spreading diseases back to you, that should be the end of the discussion. With those taken into account, I don't need or care to know a number.

 

[Cubsfan23]

I should clarify one thing I do consider a womens sexual past based on quality not quantity

That's how i feel. Also, take into account the quality of women they've been with, as well

 

[Leguna]

-jinx-

The number of partners that a woman had is irrelevant, and it offends me that you'd value an experienced woman less.

Well then, so I'd take it you'd love a woman who's slept with 40 other men before you; she's experienced! The number of partners is VERY relevant. You must look for quality girls.

it's clear that Leguna considers a woman having a lot of partners to be a bad thing

Let's put it this way...If i met a girl that had 20 partners, I would be afraid that she'd have something and having so many partners shows that she was a little careless. So yes, I do view it has something negative the more partners you have. But that's my personal opinion.

darscot:

The last thing I want to be thinking about a girl during sex is: "Has she ever done this before?" I need a girl with some skill and experience.

Has any here ever heard of learning together? I garuntee everyone here that NO ONE here knows how to pleasure every woman. Men, for the most part, are fairly easy to pleasure.

Lathentar:

I think there is a big difference in a girl that has had many sex partners and a girl that has few. I'd be a little irked to find that I was dating someone that has had more than say... 15 sexual partners (considering I'm only 20). Just depends on what sex means to you really.

Exactly.

FortNinety:

Seriously Leguna, you are a f'n... I cannot believe that you even have a girlfriend with such a smug, holier than though attitude.

In what I wrote, what in the WORLD makes you think I have a "holier than though" attitude? My advice is no more reliable than my own experience. I'm in no way saying this is law. This is my own personal advice to everyone, take it or leave it.

Boogie:

He's not creating a thread for discussion and opinions, he just creates it so that he can impart his great wisdom upon us lesser beings

My advice is no more reliable than my own experience, take it or leave it. At least we agree.

ToxicAdam:

You have put all these "conditions" on sex ... that you have stripped any type of pleasure away from it. You will lead a very sexually frustrated experience on this planet.

That's why it's sometimes best to wait. Part of getting married is the requirement to be tested. If the couple are virgins, there's not a worry in the world. Having sex before marriage, sorry, but there are responsibilities one needs to consider. That's just the world we live in. You could live your sexual life carelessly, but you could end up with something you wish you never wanted.

MrPing1000:
Read what I wrote to FortyNinety.

NLB2:
I view abortion as murder.

8bit:
My post is not a religous stand, it's something to help make things clear to people on a very important issue. Something you could even tell your kids. Religion only plays a part if you are religous, but the same question still stands.

sonarrat:

If you are struggling with what sexual behaviors are and aren't wrong, you're already asking the wrong question, and this already calls into question exactly how open your mind can possibly be. What is your own background?

I WAS struggling with it before, not anymore.

Correction: You have an answer, which may be perfectly valid for you but may or may not hold water if transferred. For that matter, you don't even know for sure if it will hold true for yourself. Shit happens, and it gets really interesting and complicated sometimes.

Actually, it's meant to work with EVERYONE. Regardless of your religion. If it doesn't work in any case you can come up with, PLEASE share! I really can't come up with anything. Again, I'm keeping on open mind.

If you view sex as a threat to your well-being, then this is a sound and logical ideology.

I don't.

You should. I think that's stupid to say because sex can be life changing. There is no 100% safe way to have sex and that small chance of things going wrong is what you are preparing yourself for. You just sound irresponsible.

By this logic, most women are not ready to have children until their mid-20's, if even then. Should they abstain from sex? The fortunate thing is that they don't have to.

Mid-20s??? Where did you get that from? Some people are not ready even after 30, some people are ready at 16. Again, it all depends on whether or not you can take responsibility for the answer to the magical question.

Here, you step out of the outline that you've put together. Now it's to someone to decide what is right or wrong, which as a statement has some applicable value to it. But it's not just an individual's choice. It's two individuals' choices. If you only think about yourself, you will run into conflict.

It is an individual's choice. Everyone has their own way of looking at it. HOWEVER, if what you mean is sharing your decision with your partner (something I never mention) yes that would be a good thing and something I would recommend.

Ok so my ideas need more time in the oven? Then please share us your's, I'm keeping an open mind on all this.

Manics:

Do blowjobs count? Let's say the girl has only slept with 3 guys (meeting your criteria) but on the side she's sucked 20-30 cocks? Would you still be willing to marry her? I don't know if your system takes that into account.

I can't answer that for you. You are the only one that knows what you want and what you are willing to settle for. Personally, foreplay is not sex, intercourse is.

Lambtron:
Don't you think sex for guys is more of a physical thing, but for girls it's also a powerful emtional event. Sex is not so trivial as you make it sound. The things you mention in your post are very important and life changing.

EviLore:
I agree with you.

 

[Folder]

Insecure much?

No. Really. I wish I had only ever had sex with my wife. I hate that I've been with other people. I guess that's just the way I am.

Having sex with a virgin makes sex look even more awkward. Not only for the sex but also for the life experience that she has.

Dude. Um, how awkward does sex usually look when you do it? :lol

 

[Folder]

Have you ever had sex? :lol

Hate to break it to you but it isn't like the movies where the guys lays on top and they passionately squirm around...well every once in awhile.

Girl let me gingerly lay you down on the bed and stroke your silky red hair and then stick it in you and wail away.

It actually is pretty animalistic with body fluids, position changes, oral sex, noises, weird faces, accidents (oops it slipped out) etc.

And obviously you have never been with a virgin, which is the epitome of awkwardness as you are introducing pain and blood (possible) into the situation.

And so you won your tag!
Mods, COME ON!

And it's a shame, but no, I never had sex. I just can't seem to talk to girls properly. It's a well documented issue...

 

[Folder]

BREAKING NEWS EXCLUSIVE

You are married to an above average girl....hooray for you, people know my record too.

So that gives you the right to side step addressing the issue and instead focus on a comment made in jest.....

and then pander to the mods.

It seems your forum replies are

animalistic with body fluids, position changes, noises, weird faces, accidents (oops it slipped out) etc.

too!
Tag this filth!

 

[EviLore]

I don't see how leguna can agree with me and still agree with himself, but hey, whatever makes him feel like he won't get banned in the next 48 hours.

Folder: stop with the tag BS, mang.

 

[Folder]

Folder: stop with the tag BS, mang.

Boo!
What's mang? Really. Am I being stupid?

 

[firex]

What's right: Ignoring Leguna's advice.

 

[Leguna]

EviLore:
Dude, I DO agree with what you said. Tell me where we differ? I'm not agreeing because I fear being ban. Just so you know, I don't like you and I have little respect for you, but I give credit where credit is due.

 

[Folder]

Talking about sex made everyone go crazy. Discuss...

 

[levious]

Has any here ever heard of learning together? I garuntee everyone here that NO ONE here knows how to pleasure every woman. Men, for the most part, are fairly easy to pleasure.

Pleasing a woman is not rocket science... licking every inch of the female body works well for starters, after that just be observant and attentive. dur

 

[Folder]

Pleasing a woman is not rocket science... licking every inch of the female body works well for starters, after that just be observant and attentive. dur

Even elbows?

 

[Boogie]

Pleasing a woman is not rocket science... licking every inch of the female body works well for starters, after that just be observant and attentive. dur

*Scribbles notes*

 

[levious]

Even elbows?

sure, she may or may not like it... that's where observant and attentive comes into play.

 

[EviLore]

EviLore:
Dude, I DO agree with what you said. Tell me where we differ? I'm not agreeing because I fear being ban. Just so you know, I don't like you and I have little respect for you, but I give credit where credit is due.

You changed your word usage, but you're still conveying the same message: that sexual history is something that needs to be forgiven, and that you're "settling" if a woman has had more sexual partners than you. That's what I'm arguing against, as are many others here.

And yes, I do know that you don't like me, what with the post-groveling threats... that you only took back once it was clear that you were fucking with the wrong people.

 

[Dilbert]

Leguna

Well then, so I'd take it you'd love a woman who's slept with 40 other men before you; she's experienced! The number of partners is VERY relevant. You must look for quality girls.

Yes, absolutely. To be more specific: What matters to me most about a woman is NOT her sexual past, and falling in love with someone is going to be based on other factors.

Let's put it this way...If i met a girl that had 20 partners, I would be afraid that she'd have something and having so many partners shows that she was a little careless. So yes, I do view it has something negative the more partners you have. But that's my personal opinion.

1) Having sex with a lot of people does not cause you to contract an STD. Having unsafe sex puts you at risk, even if it's with only one person.

2) How does having a lot of partners make her "careless?"

 

[Folder]

You changed your word usage, but you're still conveying the same message: that sexual history is something that needs to be forgiven, and that you're "settling" if a woman has had more sexual partners than you. That's what I'm arguing against, as are many others here.

And yes, I do know that you don't like me, what with the post-groveling threats... that you only took back once it was clear that you were fucking with the wrong people.

Feel the blend of sex, rage and power! I'm getting hard!
EviLore, of course it needn't be forgiven. I think the boy was simply refering to the fact that the concept of your girl having done the wild monkey dance with enemy monkeys in the past isn't really a nice one...
Like I said, I wish I had only ever had sex with my wife. I hate that we/I've been with other people.

 

[levious]

I think the boy was simply refering to the fact that the concept of your girl having done the wild monkey dance with enemy monkeys in the past isn't really a nice one...

I don't think that's what he's getting at... more so the more past partners she's had, the less desirable the woman.

I'd much prefer ending up with a "slut" as some here like to call them. At least you know she enjoys sex. Much better than ending up with someone who doesn't and then later refuses to have sex at later ages.

 

[Argyle]

2) How does having a lot of partners make her "careless?"

Well, duh! She must be careless if she keeps tripping and landing on someone's dick

 

[Fixed2BeBroken]

I'm not sure why I'm jumping in here but, here goes.

For the record I stand firmly with Jinx and Darscot in their views. Who gives a fuck how many dudes a chick slept with before you. Why is it a litmus test for her and not for you? Fuck that, its weak excuse.

You guys come off as buffons. In one thread you are salavating over scantily clad women in one thread but, in the other thread you are saying they can't fuck anyone. Pick a team. Either you go with the Nuns or the Whores.

I'll take Whores six ways from Sunday everytime.

heh, this part of the discussion reminds me of chasing amy

 

[Ristamar]

Insecure much?

It's a fairly natural reaction when emotions are involved, especially if the previous partners aren't exactly anonymous faces or the person is still dealing with lingering issues from relationships and encounters in the past.

People constantly judge each other by their decisions and actions every day. Sex isn't any different, and the relevance of a person's sexual history is going to vary from person to person.

 

[Leguna]

Bogdan:

Number of partners has nothing to do with quality. It has everything to do with your own insecurities.

That's your opinion, congratulations. I don't care if you are looking for girls that have had sex with 40 other guys, I'm looking for something different. Did you know that exploring the world of sex for the first time with your partner can be a part of the enjoyment of it, growing together sexually?

EviLore:

You changed your word usage, but you're still conveying the same message: that sexual history is something that needs to be forgiven, and that you're "settling" if a woman has had more sexual partners than you. That's what I'm arguing against, as are many others here.

Why are you bringing up something that isn't there??? I removed the word "forgiven" as soon as someone had spotted it out. I "look past" their sexual history.

We can settle this with one question. Do you care about a girl's sexual past? My personal answer is yes to an extent.

-jinx-:

Yes, absolutely. To be more specific: What matters to me most about a woman is NOT her sexual past, and falling in love with someone is going to be based on other factors.

No doubt falling in love is based on an infinite amount of things, who's arguing that? Why are you telling this?

Having sex with a lot of people does not cause you to contract an STD. Having unsafe sex puts you at risk, even if it's with only one person.

WOW, no kidding. But realize, even having "safe" sex can still potentially have the same result (i'm sure you already knew that though).

How does having a lot of partners make her "careless?"

That's a stupid question, but I'm actually going to spend the time to answer that even though you maybe being sarcastic. Sex, in my opinion, should only be used to take an already existing relationship to a higher level. To develop a strong relationship takes time and if a girl has had 40 partners by my age, she obviously doesn't value the a relationship with people the way I do. And believe me, most people wouldn't like that either.

 

[Dilbert]

I "look past" their sexual history.

And, one sentence later, we get this:

We can settle this with one question. Do you care about a girl's sexual past? My personal answer is yes to an extent.

Can you honestly not see how those two statements are contradictory? Either it matters to you, or it doesn't. Pick one.

 

[Tarazet]

sonarrat:

I WAS struggling with it before, not anymore.

And once again, you call into question whether you have an open mind. I don't have the answers to this either, but the holes in your argument are enormous.

Actually, it's meant to work with EVERYONE. Regardless of your religion. If it doesn't work in any case you can come up with, PLEASE share! I really can't come up with anything. Again, I'm keeping on open mind.

Your idea that the idea of right or wrong is entirely based on what the individual is willing to sacrifice is absolutely stupid. I'm going to borrow a train of logic from Hans on OA - I could say that I was willing to risk going to jail for having sex with kids. By your logic, I should be secure in this. I have determined what I'm willing to sacrifice, and I stand by my values. Of course, that's not what you meant, and you wouldn't condone this (right?) - but it shows how incomplete and fallacious your statement is.

You should. I think that's stupid to say because sex can be life changing. There is no 100% safe way to have sex and that small chance of things going wrong is what you are preparing yourself for. You just sound irresponsible.

You have to give the scientific world credit for what it has done. Nothing is ever perfect, but you have to acknowledge when things improve. The state of it is better than it has ever been, overall.

Mid-20s??? Where did you get that from? Some people are not ready even after 30, some people are ready at 16. Again, it all depends on whether or not you can take responsibility for the answer to the magical question.

Financially ready, mentally ready, in a stable enough environment to raise a child.. it's not just a matter of being brave enough to skip the condom, which you make it sound like.

It is an individual's choice. Everyone has their own way of looking at it. HOWEVER, if what you mean is sharing your decision with your partner (something I never mention) yes that would be a good thing and something I would recommend.

That is exactly what I'm getting at. Your inability to take this into account in the beginning is emblematic of how incomplete and haphazard your post was - this is not something that can be safely omitted, especially in a post which has such ambitious pretenses.

Ok so my ideas need more time in the oven? Then please share us your's, I'm keeping an open mind on all this.

I'm not qualified to do what you're attempting to do. Nor are you.

 

[Boogie]

That's your opinion, congratulations. I don't care if you are looking for girls that have had sex with 40 other guys, I'm looking for something different. Did you know that exploring the world of sex for the first time with your partner can be a part of the enjoyment of it, growing together sexually?


That's a stupid question, but I'm actually going to spend the time to answer that even though you maybe being sarcastic. Sex, in my opinion, should only be used to take an already existing relationship to a higher level. To develop a strong relationship takes time and if a girl has had 40 partners by my age, she obviously doesn't value the a relationship with people the way I do. And believe me, most people wouldn't like that either.

I'd just like to jump in and give some support to Leguna here. I don't want to argue, I'm not saying "THIS IS RIGHT AND YOUR OPINIONS ARE WRONG", but this is also sorta how I feel towards sex too.

 

[darscot]

Some of you guys just need to grow up. This whole issue will just die once you start to get the whole sex thing figured out. Sex is a entirely different beast with every person. Limiting yourself is just pointless. It'ld be like if your favorite sports team played the same team everynight. It's very healthy to go through a stage where you try it with different people. Then you'll settle in and find some one special. But you have to go through the stage. If you or your women doesn't one of you will find the other in bed with someone else.

 

[Drinky Crow]

Hey, you kids gotta admit, this beats a FINAL JUDGMENT any ol' day of the week.

 

[Boogie]

Hey, you kids gotta admit, this beats a FINAL JUDGMENT any ol' day of the week.

This is true.

 

[onion_pixy]

Questions for Leguna :

1. At what point do you ask said girl about her past partners? First date? third date? I have this awesome mental picture at a bar "hey baby, wuss up? I'll buy you a drink if you sucked no more than 5 cocks"

2. Have you considered maybe that girls will either withhold or lie about this info? I mean, its kind of a personal think to ask. And I would probably not give out a number due to the rudenss of the question. I would also think about smacking the asker as well. It really shoulndt come up. I can see talking about past experiences, "have you ever done XXX" but not a direct "how many cocks have you been stuck with beyatch!!"


3. Have you considered that maybe, just maybe girls who have had more partners are more open minded and educated in the ways of sex. (ie protection) A girl who maybe has your narrow minded and limited views may not be as educated about sex. She may have only had 1 or 2 partners but wasnt informed enough about protection to know how to use it properly. She may have even been coerced into sex or not to use protecion if she was with a guy telling her HE hadnt been with that many people either.

 

[Dilbert]

"hey baby, wuss up? I'll buy you a drink if you sucked no more than 5 cocks"

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

And, assuming the answer is something like, "Cock? What's a cock?" I can see Leguna putting on his Neo-esque sunglasses and shouting, "FINAL JUDGMENT: You are worthy of getting it!"

 

[evil solrac v3.0]

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

And, assuming the answer is something like, "Cock? What's a cock?" I can see Leguna putting on his Neo-esque sunglasses and shouting, "FINAL JUDGMENT: You are worthy of getting it!"

please dont encourage him. he'd make a CG movie out of it and subject us to some squaresoft like artwork or somesuch.... *shudder*....

 

[Leguna]

darscot:
Ok, I can agree with that. I know what you are trying to say, but you didn't quite put it right.

Boogie:
YES! Holy cow! What it takes to get some support around here!!! I'm really not saying anything too outlandish about sex here. I'm reading some funky views here. Hey, I'm not trying to say I'm right, you're wrong either!!!!! I just think this would help, take it or leave it. My advice is no more reliable than my own experience.

sonarrat:

I don't have the answers to this either, but the holes in your argument are enormous.

Then why are you acting like you do???

I'm going to borrow a train of logic from Hans on OA - I could say that I was willing to risk going to jail for having sex with kids.

There is a given factor here. I could come up with a lot of similar things to say about that too, but it's a given that things like RAPE and CHILD MOLESTING are obviously things that have very NEGATIVE ramifications. So don't just sit there trying to nick pick through my article just to say you pointed out something "wrong" in what i said. You don't earn anything by doing that. How about instead of trying to just say to me, you're wrong, tell everyone else what you think works. This isn't a contest. I appreciate your feedback but it's obvious you're on a mission here.

You do realize I'm not trying to impose anything on anyone? I'm just trying to help anyone here that might have been as confused about it all as much as I was here. If it doesn't help you then maybe you have something to share that helps more.

Bogdan:
You of anyone here that has posted has made a point that made me think. It was when you said this...

Religious people have twisted sex into this sacred thing that it isn't. It is the basic urge, the desire to reproduce. It is about two sweaty hot bodies pumping together and a rush of endomorphines. The only value to it is what YOU ascribe to it, and from reading your posts it isn't so much what you think it is instead what you have been told and conditioned to think.

The only problem with this is you don't take into consideration feelings and emotions as well as things that could come of sex. But I do agree with the comment that religion does make sex to be more than what it really is. Watch the movie Dr.Kinsey, great movie.

 

[evil solrac v3.0]

you got too many contradictions in your arguments leguna. and it's sad that you cant see them when people here have already pointed them out.