Support NeoGAF

[Leguna]

TO ALL:
I'm going to address these "contradictions" right now...

Saying that I care about a girls sexual past is true and saying that I would look past a girl's sexual past is also TRUE!

Allow me to explain, at one point in a relationship I will ask my girlfriend about her sexual past because it has a direct impact on whether or not I would sleep with her or even in some cases kiss her. But if her sexual past is something that wouldn't bother me, I would look past it even if she did somethings WRONG. Watch the movie Chasing Amy.

Now if there is another contradiction, let me know and I'll address it.

 

[Tarazet]

sonarrat:

Then why are you acting like you do???

There's a difference here. I'm just shooting you down for not taking the time or effort to type everything that would need to be typed to cover this topic adequately, yet passing it off as a miraculous discovery which should be engraved in our foreheads and passed on to our children. I'm not the one who's attempting to put together a guide, and not a guide to sex itself, but how to think about sex. If you find yourself frustrated, believe me, it's not because I'm right. It's because you are clearly in over your head.

There is a given factor here. I could come up with a lot of similar things to say about that too, but it's a given that things like RAPE and CHILD MOLESTING are obviously things that have very NEGATIVE ramifications. So don't just sit there trying to nick pick through my article just to say you pointed out something "wrong" in what i said. You don't earn anything by doing that. How about instead of trying to just say to me, you're wrong, tell everyone else what you think works. This isn't a contest. I appreciate your feedback but it's obvious you're on a mission here.

That "given factor" is what's wrong with your argument. You can't define what's wrong, therefore you're back at square one and without any solid ground to stand on.

You do realize I'm not trying to impose anything on anyone? I'm just trying to help anyone here that might have been as confused about it all as much as I was here. If it doesn't help you then maybe you have something to share that helps more.

1. I haven't seen anyone else crying out for an explanation.
2. Yours is inadequate.
3. Your argument of "not trying to impose" doesn't help your case. If you want to accomplish what you meant to accomplish, you would need to produce a full-length, extensively researched book. You'd need an editor. You certainly couldn't do it in 30 minutes using a text-input window.

 

[Loki]

I have this awesome mental picture at a bar "hey baby, wuss up? I'll buy you a drink if you sucked no more than 5 cocks"

:lol

And then the girl would go, "Are you kidding!? I LOOOOVE THE COCK!", and Leguna would become indignant and smack that bitch up like Prodigy, shattering the veneer of civility he's carefully crafted after "The EviLore Incident ®".


Ok, now it's officially time for me to find something constructive to do with myself...


No offense intended Leguna-- I'm just messing around. I don't think your civility is a facade, btw, it just worked in the (incredibly bad) joke.

 

[Dilbert]

TO ALL:
I'm going to address these "contradictions" right now...

Saying that I care about a girls sexual past is true and saying that I would look past a girl's sexual past is also TRUE!

Allow me to explain, at one point in a relationship I will ask my girlfriend about her sexual past because it has a direct impact on whether or not I would sleep with her or even in some cases kiss her. But if her sexual past is something that wouldn't bother me, I would look past it even if she did somethings WRONG. Watch the movie Chasing Amy.

Now if there is another contradiction, let me know and I'll address it.

Here's the thing. What you are saying is that you're willing to "look past" her past IF you decide that it doesn't bother you. The problem is, that isn't how the rest of the world uses that phrase. To "look past" something means to "get over something which DOES bother you." (Example: "I'm willing to look past the fact that a particular girl is a Republican if we get along well in other areas.") You're still judging her choices as wrong, and in particular, there are some answers which would be "too wrong" to deal with.

 

[evil solrac v3.0]

Allow me to explain, at one point in a relationship I will ask my girlfriend about her sexual past because it has a direct impact on whether or not I would sleep with her or even in some cases kiss her.

THERE. ARE. NO. WORDS.

 

[levious]

A person's sexual history is nobody's business but their own, and I'd hope most people would agree. Getting tested for things and exchanging medical documents prior to sexual relations is another matter, and fully justifiable.

Like Leguna said, there are std's that are not stopped by condoms and other such devices.

 

[Macam]

TO ALL:
Allow me to explain, at one point in a relationship I will ask my girlfriend about her sexual past because it has a direct impact on whether or not I would sleep with her or even in some cases kiss her. But if her sexual past is something that wouldn't bother me, I would look past it even if she did somethings WRONG. Watch the movie Chasing Amy.

Please don't taint good movies with your poor logic.

 

[Drinky Crow]

Wow, Leguna, do you declare a woman to be your GF *before* you kiss and/or humptify them?

As for the "Chasing Amy" remark, I think Leguna means that he's willing to forgive their promiscuous past if they were OMG TEH LEZBEENZ HOTT0RZ!!!!111

Methinks our pal is still stuck in a rerun of Happy Days.