WitchHunter
Banned
You mean the sugary beverages and the ultra processed foods?That's partially true but some business do target kids and early teenagers who don't have jobs.
You mean the sugary beverages and the ultra processed foods?That's partially true but some business do target kids and early teenagers who don't have jobs.
This.Had to doublecheck that i was on Neogaf and not Retardera when i saw the threadtitle.
Yes, I had the same thing with my C64... I was severely restricted to use it, maybe 1-2 hours a day. But of course I used every opportunity to extend the limitations . But it didn't put evil thoughts in your head, it just stimulated people in a good way. They saw something that was the pinnacle of hand-made animation and thoughtful storytelling that is very hard to imitate, let alone replicate.Watching Ninja Scroll as a kid in the 90's on VHS....Definitely had to wait for Mom and Dad to be out the house...
You should consider who's doing more of the crime. It's funny you bring up the third world, because they've been importing the third world into western and European countries for many years now and it's been shown the vast majority don't assimilate. When you bring third world in, as evidenced in countries like Sweden etc., you get third world problems.It's clearly a growing epidemic among our youth. 2022 statistics show a truly disheartening number of unsolved and unprosecuted violent crimes on the uptick. Before you say "this is just some far off third world country issue," and go about your day, allow me to ask when you, the reader, has last seen a videogame character walking his dog? Going to the supermarket? Attending church? Nay, the silence is your sheepish answer. Donate one dollar to the "I'm a Jackass," organization, and 100 cents of it will go toward being a jackass.
One could also argue that such games act as a substitute so these people don't resolve to physical violence on others / animals. Hence the need of actual studies, which as said brings no conclusive proof.Well I don't know if I would go that far.
I think individuals who are easily influenced or lean towards violent tendencies will 100% get something from video games that allows them to be even more violent than they already are. I believe this type of stimulation for someone who's already violent can be very very dangerous, That being said it is not the video games job or any piece of media's job to censor itself based on individuals who might use it to influence their future crimes.
So I believe any of those works truly can lead to incidents of violence, But ultimately I believe that violence is inevitable if the person is predisposed to this they're simply less creative without that stimuli.
Which basically means we had serial killers before the invention of video games, If we might have more creative ones now lol
@mrmustard lol damn that was a good ass series
They're aimed at adults and even teenagers should know better by parenting... We can try and ban lacking parenting instead lolGuys,
I was randomly looking at the COD graphics thread. Given I never play these kind of FPSs, I was shocked to see how realistic it looked.
To be honest, I cannot imagine having a kid and being ok with them playing this kind of game non stop.
Morally, I don't think it is right that the entertainment industry gives a free pass to films and video games which depict so much violence and killing other people (even in the context of war, etc.) while at the same time you cannot even show a female nipple in a video game or on instagram.
One could argue it is useful "propaganda" as young men need to be mentally stimulated in case we have to go to war as killing is not a natural act, while sex is a natural act and you don't need to be stimulated by entertainment in order to want to do it.
Or that there is a slipperier slope from sex on screen to rapes than from killing on screen to murders.
But to be honest, I don't really buy these reasons and they are not moral to me.
Is it just the case of the US being built historically on violence and murders and having this violence in its DNA and having imposed these values to the rest of the world through mass entertainment in the last decades? But at the same time, I would think every country has, by definition, been built on sex as well? Giving birth is the most beautiful thing someone can do while killing is the contrary.
What do you think?
Should "sex simulators" be allowed (as killing simulators are)?
Should video games focused on guns, killing, etc. be outlawed or much more restricted to minors?
To add a bit:
I have always been a bit perplexed by the double standard between violence and sex in video games. Violence is morally bad while totally ok in VGs (?). Sex is morally neutral at worst while totally not ok in VG.
In a typical American family, you will find teens playing FPSs and killing Russians or Iraqis all day and the parents will not be bothered by it (just "the boys playing their xbox") while I would imagine that if the main protagonist was engaging in realistic sex on the 60' TV, even if it is in a normal and healthy way, the parents would do more than bat an eyelid lol.
Maybe it is because sex concerns everyone while American parents dont mind about Russians soldiers?
Have you heard about Juul E cigarettes.You mean the sugary beverages and the ultra processed foods?
Guys,
I was randomly looking at the COD graphics thread. Given I never play these kind of FPSs, I was shocked to see how realistic it looked.
To be honest, I cannot imagine having a kid and being ok with them playing this kind of game non stop.
And everyone is hooked now? Youngsters vaping left and right, can't seem to rid the cursed thing?Have you heard about Juul E cigarettes.
.
Juul Labs, the vaping company that has long insisted it never marketed its products to teenagers, purchased ad space in its early days on numerous youth-focused websites, including those of Nickelodeon, the Cartoon Network, Seventeen magazine and educational sites for middle school and high school students, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Massachusetts attorney general.
The suit, brought by the state’s attorney general, Maura Healey, presents some of the starkest evidence to date that the company was targeting young, nonsmokers during its launch period, from June 2015 through early 2016.
Juul executives declined to address the specific charges in the complaint. Instead, a company spokesman, Austin Finan, issued a statement that pointed to recent actions Juul has taken to combat underage vaping and said: “We remain focused on resetting the vapor category in the U.S. and earning the trust of society by working cooperatively with attorneys general, regulators, public health officials and other stakeholders to combat underage use and transition adult smokers from combustible cigarettes.”