• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Shyamalan's next: Lady in the Water

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
The Hollywood Reporter said:
M. Night Shyamalan will next write and direct the fantasy thriller Lady in the Water for Warner Bros. Pictures.

The movie centers on the superintendent of an apartment building who finds a rare type of sea nymph swimming in the apartment pool.

Production will begin in August on location in Philadelphia, for a release in July 2006.

Shyamalan's last four films - The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs and The Village - were distributed by Disney. The studio and Shyamalan discussed "Lady," but the two decided mutually to part ways on the project.
Hmm, interesting that Disney opted not to produce this one. The Village may have fell well short of Signs and The Sixth Sense, but it still pulled in $250 million worldwide and I bet DVD sales were alright.

I have no idea what to make of that plot description.
 
The movie centers on the superintendent of an apartment building who finds a rare type of sea nymph swimming in the apartment pool.

At he end, it turns out he's really a sea nymph, living in an undersea world of sea nymphs, and he was only dreaming he was a human apartment superintendent.
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
Lucky Forward said:
At he end, it turns out he's really a sea nymph, living in an undersea world of sea nymphs, and he was only dreaming he was a human apartment superintendent.

:lol :lol :lol :lol
 

Manics

Banned
Lucky Forward said:
At he end, it turns out he's really a sea nymph, living in an undersea world of sea nymphs, and he was only dreaming he was a human apartment superintendent.


And he's dead.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
TheQueen'sOwn said:
I thought he was doing The Life of Pi...
Obviously not, at least not next. Last I'd heard he hadn't committed to doing it, so I guess he's passing for now.
 

ToxicAdam

Member
The sea nymph is played by Daryll Hannah and the Superintendent is played by Tom Hanks.

Now they just need to find a fat guy to play the wise-cracking friend.

36m.jpg
 

darscot

Member
This makes me very happy. I did not want him doing the life of pie. He just doesnt have the skill to pull it off. It would have just ended up another generic twist move. Life of Pie was brilliant and needs and equally brillinat director. I know this is off topic but how do you guys think should direct it?
 

Iceman

Member
Doesn't have the skill?

Ha.

If anything he wouldn't do The Life of Pi because he can't make sure all of the production could be done in Philadelphia.
 

darscot

Member
The Life of Pie has so much more going on then a twist ending. The guy is a one trick pony. Also if he did it everyone would be expecting the twist and it would completely ruin the film.
 

Iceman

Member
darscot said:
The Life of Pie has so much more going on then a twist ending. The guy is a one trick pony. Also if he did it everyone would be expecting the twist and it would completely ruin the film.

Pardon me, but you suck, sir.

Is the Sixth Sense any less good without the twist? I was just about bawling in the penultimate scene with the dead bicyclist.

Is Unbreakable only as good as the twist?

Does Signs have a twist?

And in The Village, I was more engaged myself in the romance and the psychology, already suspecting the twist.

As with all of his movies, the meat of the thing is in the story.. not the twist. The twists do nothing to the stories themselves except give you an alternate viewpoint from which to rewatch the story. They don't change the experience. The same thing can be said for The Life of Pi. The twist gives you something additional to think about.. it doesn't negate the narrative, the experiences presented in the story proper. In the end you have to decide what's more relevant.
 

Flynn

Member
Dan said:
Hmm, interesting that Disney opted not to produce this one. The Village may have fell well short of Signs and The Sixth Sense, but it still pulled in $250 million worldwide and I bet DVD sales were alright.

I have no idea what to make of that plot description.

Disney was very pleased with The Village, this comes from a first-hand source. It's first weekend was very strong and it made exactly the amount they suspected.

I think the decision to release the movie may not have been Disney's. I would imagine that Shamalyan was a little perturbed by the movie's deceptive marketing (e.g. making it look like Aliens in the 1800s when it was really a twilight zone episode about parents going to extremes to protect their children from violence) which might have led him to look elsewhere.

And before you all say that a movies about nymphs sounds lame rent John Sayle's The Secret of Roan Innish, one of the best family films of the '90s.
 

Crandle

Member
the superintendent is actually King Arthur, unaware he was reincarnated to save his homeland (which is now America because democracy = the Round Table) until he manages to decipher what the mysterious "sea nymph" (more like Lady of the Lake) is telling him

then he uses "Excalibur" (which was his ring of door keys all along!) to beat Mordred, who's, uh, an animal-rights terrorist or something

also an alien
 
Flynn said:
And before you all say that a movies about nymphs sounds lame rent John Sayle's The Secret of Roan Innish, one of the best family films of the '90s.

You sir just made me so happy. I love John Sayles.
 
Crandle said:
the superintendent is actually King Arthur, unaware he was reincarnated to save his homeland (which is now America because democracy = the Round Table) until he manages to decipher what the mysterious "sea nymph" (more like Lady of the Lake) is telling him

then he uses "Excalibur" (which was his ring of door keys all along!) to beat Mordred, who's, uh, an animal-rights terrorist or something

also an alien
Wasn't that the plot of The Fisher King?
 

Grifter

Member
Iceman said:
Pardon me, but you suck, sir.

Is the Sixth Sense any less good without the twist? I was just about bawling in the penultimate scene with the dead bicyclist.

Is Unbreakable only as good as the twist?

Does Signs have a twist?

And in The Village, I was more engaged myself in the romance and the psychology, already suspecting the twist.

As with all of his movies, the meat of the thing is in the story.. not the twist. The twists do nothing to the stories themselves except give you an alternate viewpoint from which to rewatch the story. They don't change the experience. The same thing can be said for The Life of Pi. The twist gives you something additional to think about.. it doesn't negate the narrative, the experiences presented in the story proper. In the end you have to decide what's more relevant.

Thank you. People seem to forget that there's more to his movies and not all of them have story altering twists. He's a terrific dramatic and suspense director.
 

darscot

Member
I did enjoy Unbreakable thought it was his best film. I have tried to watch the Village about ten times and have yet to manager to do it. The Life of Pie does fit his style but I would much prefer David Fincher, Tom Tykwer or Joe Carnahan as director. Shit I'ld take Tarantino over Shyamalan but it would be a whole different film.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Flynn said:
I think the decision to release the movie may not have been Disney's. I would imagine that Shamalyan was a little perturbed by the movie's deceptive marketing (e.g. making it look like Aliens in the 1800s when it was really a twilight zone episode about parents going to extremes to protect their children from violence) which might have led him to look elsewhere.
Could be, but for some reason I'm thinking I've read that Shyamalan has been very active in working on the marketing and trailers. I could be wrong and mistaking him with another director, but I'd be interested to know why the split. Shyamalan's films pulled in $1.5 billion in worldwide box office, so there's gotta be some reason. Either way, the Disney stockholder part of my brain is annoyed that WB will be distributing this one instead of Disney ;)
 

speedpop

Has problems recognising girls
Iceman said:
As with all of his movies, the meat of the thing is in the story.. not the twist. The twists do nothing to the stories themselves except give you an alternate viewpoint from which to rewatch the story. They don't change the experience. The same thing can be said for The Life of Pi. The twist gives you something additional to think about.. it doesn't negate the narrative, the experiences presented in the story proper. In the end you have to decide what's more relevant.
This man speaks the truth. I've always admired Shyamalan's movies simply because of the undertones and metaphors that are rampart in the movies that no one else I seem to talk to knows about. They're always expecting that big end twist, but I'm always expecting a different base-theme on his movies. The twist or whatever is just a bonus.
 
Even though The Village was off target, I think Disney is going to regret not working with Night, especailly if this means in the future he'll work for Warner Bros. or other studios instead.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Variety reports today that offers have went out to Paul Giamatti and Bryce Dallas Howard to be the leads.
 

Pochacco

asking dangerous questions
Hopefully, this movie does not have an 'epiphany moment'.
If he wants to start branching out, he's gonna have to get away from that.

He doesn't need it anyhow. The suspense and pacing of his films is great.
 

darscot

Member
Well I finaly sat down and watched The Village and you guys suck. It was horrible. About ten minutes in you know that these are just a bunch of freaks that have set up there own little freak Kingdom. Boring!
 

effzee

Member
darscot said:
Well I finaly sat down and watched The Village and you guys suck. It was horrible. About ten minutes in you know that these are just a bunch of freaks that have set up there own little freak Kingdom. Boring!


gaf told u to watch it? i remember the village overall wasnt liked much here.


i thought it was good...nothing amazing but good. not his best work but certainly not horrible. but i guess expectations have gone up.


btw that scene in the village when
the blind girl hold her hand out waiting for phenoix to take her in as the monster is coming....very nicely done

village was a love story. marketing led people to believe otherwise.
 

darscot

Member
That was a good scene, I also liked the scene where the guy is hiding in the closet. Nice foreshadowing of him becoming the villan. I did think it was very cheap to make that character the villan though.
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
Unbreakable was such an awesome movie. I felt so vindicated when Bruce Willis was on the Daily Show and Jon Stewart said that everyone there felt Unbreakable was his best movie. I figured I was the only person who appreciated how awesome of a movie it was.
 

Iceman

Member
From wikipedia.

"In Greek mythology, a nymph is any member of a large class of female nature spirits, sometimes bound to a particular location or landform. Nymphs often accompanied various gods and goddesses, and were the frequent target of lusty satyrs."

Those dirty old satyrs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom