The arbitration verdict has a surprise twist [in which the judge rules that Hooli would own Pied Pipers underlying IP because Richard worked on it using a Hooli computer, but Hoolis illegal employment agreement with Richard cancels that out]. Did you guys tinker with different outcomes on that case in the writers room?
Originally, we talked about a thing that happened to me and some other people at MTVI think Dan Cortese had a similar thingwhere their contract with us was so aggressive that it actually violated labor laws. So I was able to get out of it. This is what I remember hearing. And then Jonathan Dotan, our consultant on the show, looked into legal things that happened, and this seemed like a really interesting one, because the contract violated Jareds right to work, not Richards. Its an interesting thing that the contract was so aggressive about, Youre not allowed to hire anybody from this company, but it violates Jareds rights, making that contract invalid. From fairly early on in the season, thats how we were going to end it. That seemed like a really interesting thing to all of us. And its a real thing. We had more stuff that we cut out with the judge complaining about his commute. Hes a guy who cant afford to live in Palo Alto anymore, so hes got to live way down in Gilroy or something and he commutes. Hes already irritated with tech people, and heres this huge companythe companies get very arrogant and they ignore California labor laws, and judges love to just go, Hey! Over here! You may be a billionaire, but were the law. You cant do that.