Son of Godzilla
Banned
DenogginizerOS said:From that perspective alone, a consumer sees the PS3 much like consumers saw a PS2 with DVD playback.
Well, no. But everything else was good.
DenogginizerOS said:From that perspective alone, a consumer sees the PS3 much like consumers saw a PS2 with DVD playback.
jmdajr said:I agree that's it's too bad the launch 599 ps3 never made it to 299.
Still even the launch Playstation lost a lot of it's I/O ports after a couple of years.
shaft said:Only 100 minutes left! Get yo asses on the hype train!
If it uses the 45nm Cell/RSX like I suspect, it will consume much less power than a 60GB. Even my new 80GB is like night and day compared to my launch 60GB.Justin Dailey said:That's awesome. If the power consumption is much lower I might trade in my 60GB for one.
leehom said:How many of you own a PS3 fat plan on purchasing the PS3 slim at $299?
*raises hand*
How many pre-existing owners do you think will purchase a slim?
A few million at least?
No. But you can backup/restore from one to another.How easy is it to transfer stuff from one ps3 to another? I cant just yank out my hard drive, pop it in the new one, and go right?
CrayzeeCarl said:If it uses the 45nm Cell/RSX like I suspect, it will consume much less power than a 60GB. Even my new 80GB is like night and day compared to my launch 60GB.
gamerecks said:How easy is it to transfer stuff from one ps3 to another? I cant just yank out my hard drive, pop it in the new one, and go right?
You will have to deactivate all activated PSN accounts on your current system, use the backup utility to backup the one PS3 to the other, reactivate all PSN accounts on your new system, and redownload all your PSN games.gamerecks said:How easy is it to transfer stuff from one ps3 to another? I cant just yank out my hard drive, pop it in the new one, and go right?
BobTheFork said:Damn, that's nice to wake up to. Now I can buy a second PS3 just to use for all the Beta's I get in.
500 - Internal Server Error
Kingsgoon said:As they raised the price for the arcade in to £159 I think you are in
for a big disappointment if you expect them to lower the Elite to £170.
BobTheFork said:Damn, that's nice to wake up to. Now I can buy a second PS3 just to use for all the Beta's I get in.
agaru said:Just to let you know guys, the conference will be streamed live:
http://thegameraccess.com/multiplatform/gamescom-live-sony-press-conference-feed
it doesn't work that way.tokkun said:I don't see anything inconsistent with this attitude.
1. Along with cutting the price of the console, Sony has also been consistently removing features - HW PS2 BC, SW PS2 BC, reduced HD size, extra ports on the console. The PS3 you said you would buy at $399 no longer exists.
2. Technology hasn't been at a standstill while the PS3 has been slowly moving toward a competitive price. Standalone Blu-Ray players have seen significant price reductions, reducing the value of the BD in the PS3. Other high-end electronics have seen big price cuts too - the iPhone launched for a similar price to the PS3 and can be had at $99 now. PC graphics cards are steadily pushing forward the cutting edge in game performance. A $299 price today is not the same as a $299 price 2 years ago.
or this way either.DenogginizerOS said:From a point-of-sale perspective, a clerk is able to hand one box to a customer for a PS3 purchase while that same clerk would have to hand over multiple boxes to a customer looking to match the experience they can get with a PS3 and charge them a lot more in the process: 1) Xbox 360 2) Xbox Live Subscription 3) Wireless Adapter 4) Blu-ray Player.
As far as games are concerned, last I checked, COD:MW2 is going to be on PS3 this Fall, Madden is on PS3 already, Assassin's Creed 2 is on PS3, and Gran Turismo 5 will be on PS3 (possibly before Christmas) in addition to many other games including the other Sony exclusives. To say the X360's lineup outside of Halo, Fable, and Gears of War is superior to the PS3's is debatable and laughable in my opinion.
In addition, the Panasonic Blu-ray player that matches the PS3's quality in playback currently retails for $299.99 at most retailers ($219.99 at Costco). From that perspective alone, a consumer sees the PS3 much like consumers saw a PS2 with DVD playback - a great deal.
agaru said:Just to let you know guys, the conference will be streamed live:
http://thegameraccess.com/multiplatform/gamescom-live-sony-press-conference-feed
Don't forget to refresh because you never know when something new is announced!
agaru said:Just to let you know guys, the conference will be streamed live:
http://thegameraccess.com/multiplatform/gamescom-live-sony-press-conference-feed
meh, they have just updated that. It wasn't there at first. Thanks.Backflip said:That looks like a "text stream" :
DoctorWho said:I think you can use the first PS3 for that too. You just want the new matte.
Justin Dailey said:You will have to deactivate all activated PSN accounts on your current system, use the backup utility to backup the one PS3 to the other, reactivate all PSN accounts on your new system, and redownload all your PSN games.
gofreak said:As for the new case... the vents on the leaked shot suggest they must be very confident about the thermal qualities of the design, because they've reduced the vents quite a lot.
Or you could use the easier method and synch with the servers.reakt said:Then you have to load up all of your games that you earned trophies for, in order to recover these trophies. This can be a problem if, like me, you've sold off or passed on some of your games.
plagiarize said:it doesn't work that way.
or this way either.
a PS3 to most consumers is a video game console. the other features... whatever. i don't think i've EVER sold a 360 and a live sub or a wireless adapter. people just buy the system and maybe the video cables in my experience, and if they want anything else then they'll come back later on realizing that they needed it.
to the first comment, a PS3 is a PS3. peoples opinion of it's value may change over time, but i think what you're actually seeing here is just a regular 'worth' curve. more and more people think a system is 'worth' a given price as that price gets cheaper. as i said before, most sales of systems happen once it hits $200 and below.
that's because most people don't think more than $200 is worth it for a video game console (even one that can play movies).
so yeah, lots of people are going to continue waiting until $199... but more people are going to have been waiting for $299 than were waiting for $399 (or $349 for that matter).
The Blue Jihad said:It's a smart move. But I wonder if the Slim is totally replacing the Fat, like during the PS2 days.
The Blue Jihad said:It's a smart move. But I wonder if the Slim is totally replacing the Fat, like during the PS2 days.
The Blue Jihad said:It's a smart move. But I wonder if the Slim is totally replacing the Fat, like during the PS2 days.
Vilix said:So, how much is the fat, what is the price of the slim, and when will the slim be avaliable in the US?
A good salesperson will inquire about what the customer wants to do with the system and will hand them the things they will need so they have them in their hands. If I were running a store and the majority of console consumers left my store with just the system in their hand only to realize later that they needed more, then I would be doing a terrible job. Nevertheless, the fact a person might have to return to the store to get a Live sub or a wireless adapter compared to a PS3 owner who may return for an HDMI cable demonstrates the PS3 is a more complete package. Finally, by having all this gear in the box, I would be able to focus on selling games (where profit margins are greater) and plant more seeds for games coming rather than getting into the Frankenstein-esque assembly that is getting started with an Xbox 360.plagiarize said:a PS3 to most consumers is a video game console. the other features... whatever. i don't think i've EVER sold a 360 and a live sub or a wireless adapter. people just buy the system and maybe the video cables in my experience, and if they want anything else then they'll come back later on realizing that they needed it.
that's because most people don't think more than $200 is worth it for a video game console (even one that can play movies).
so yeah, lots of people are going to continue waiting until $199... but more people are going to have been waiting for $299 than were waiting for $399 (or $349 for that matter).
SecretBonusPoint said:So they really did it. They priced the slim right there at the price-cut.
Get GT5 out this year and along with Uncharted 2 that is a killer outlook for the holidays and going forward.
sloppyjoe_gamer said:What did i miss? Was something confirmed before the Sony conference?
DenogginizerOS said:A good salesperson will inquire about what the customer wants to do with the system and will hand them the things they will need so they have them in their hands. If I were running a store and the majority of console consumers left my store with just the system in their hand only to realize later that they needed more, then I would be doing a terrible job. Nevertheless, the fact a person might have to return to the store to get a Live sub or a wireless adapter compared to a PS3 owner who may return for an HDMI cable demonstrates the PS3 is a more complete package. Finally, by having all this gear in the box, I would be able to focus on selling games (where profit margins are greater) and plant more seeds for games coming rather than getting into the Frankenstein-esque assembly that is getting started with an Xbox 360.
GSG Flash said:If Kmart isn't bulshitting us, and the PS3 slim exists, is $299 and is coming next week, then great move by Sony. For once, a press conference will actually have lived up to it's megaton hype :lol
Even though I'm happy with my 80 GB, so I don't plan on selling it and buying a Slim or even just buying a second PS3 (it's not even about the BC, I would sorely miss my media card slots and 4 USB ports) I'm really excited for the Slim and I can't wait to see what it looks like. Although I would rather see Sony hit Nintendo head-on and price the Slim at $250 so that the Wii being stupidly overpriced looks even more ridiculous than it already does, $299 is still a-ok in my books (especially since I paid $500 for mine).
The Blue Jihad said:It's a smart move. But I wonder if the Slim is totally replacing the Fat, like during the PS2 days.