Care to share the gist of the argument?
<EviLore> anyway, back to the original point, bruce lee didn't really prove himself in competition at all AFAIK. He claimed to have won a bunch of rooftop HK street fights (some with weapons), and he trained with some notable competitive martial artists, but he was a movie star, orin. And according to the sources I referenced there, his cardio and leg strength were flatly average.
(note: sourced
http://www.myodynamics.com/articles/bruce.html )
<EviLore> so no, bruce lee from the '70s would DIE to fedor emelianenko from today, no question.
<Shouta> Bruce Lee probably wouldn't be any good in a 1v1 match against someone like Fedor but he'd probably way better on a battlefield, assuming he was everything people claim him to be heh
<EviLore> Shouta: you talking like Dynasty Warriors type shit now? haha
<Shouta> I really meant large conflicts between two factions involving hand to hand combat or feudal/medival combat
<Shouta> or even a Bar brawl
<Shouta> Takedowns, holds, and etc are much more effective in a 1v1 enviroment than striking and etc where as, (IMO), it's the opposite in non-1v1 enviroment
<EviLore> well, fedor has K-1 level standup and cardio in addition to his sambo throws, takedowns, and subs
<EviLore> so I'll put my money on him in a bar brawl ;b
<Shouta> I'd be wary if it was 2v1 heh
<Shouta> No matter how skilled and strong you are, you're still at a disadvantage with another body going at you heh
<EviLore> *shrug*, hard to say what anyone would do in a 2v1 environ
<Shouta> And that's often how fights turn out in a large setting
<EviLore> goes both ways really ;b
<Shouta> true
<Shouta> Anyway, that's the real difference between TMA and the prominent styles found in things like MMA
<Shouta> IMO of course
<Shouta> I think a fair number of people forget that heh
<EviLore> eh really I've just become sick of purported "effectiveness" and I'm really rather complacent to just watch the actual competitions. If someone thinks that some mountain hermit has a perfect style...that's fine, I'll nod my head and continue watching the people who are willing and able to prove themselves. As was touched upon though, it's more the person and his drive than the style, but having the right tools is *very* important.
<Shouta> I'm just sad to see so many folks write off a style because it's not "effective" in freestyle competitions despite the fact that some styles just haven't trained actual fighters for a long time
<EviLore> Shouta: well that's pretty much the hard truth to it though. What a TMA was in the past is just the past if it doesn't focus on the same things anymore
<Shouta> Well no, I'm talking about the people that assert that it was never effective heh
<EviLore> stuff like that's kinda hard to prove though
<Shouta> Whether or not a style can be effective now is a whole different issue really. I'm just against people that call it was always ineffective and etc
<EviLore> it's like saying that old-skool kenjutsu in the hands of a skilled practicioner could take out old-skool euro sword styles, armor differences aside. Even if there's some historic battle evidence, there's still stated vs real number differences, armor differences, morale differences, physical attribute differences, etc. etc. etc. Endless conditions. And today people don't fight to the death generally
<EviLore> I'm not going to discount anything though, it's just difficult to conclusively say anything when in that sort of realm. It's very easy to see the current stuff in practice now