Catalyst said:Probably a temporary ban...but...why would you ban someone over a little letter like that, anyway?
More likely banned for the fact that he is a total dumbshit who never ever posts anything remotely approaching intelligent.
Catalyst said:Probably a temporary ban...but...why would you ban someone over a little letter like that, anyway?
Schafer said:More likely banned for the fact that he is a total dumbshit who never ever posts anything remotely approaching intelligent.
Yeah, but uh, most of the forum does stupid things at times. I don't think he violated TOS. I've seen worse on here...like that one guy who still bathes with his 10-year-old son lol) and he didn't get banned on his troll-ness. Ah well. Here's hoping for a temp ban.Schafer said:More likely banned for the fact that he is a total dumbshit who never ever posts anything remotely approaching intelligent.
mashoutposse said:Damn, he got banned for that?
WasabiKing said:As for calling someone unprofessional on a mistake they made on an article, that's ridiculous. Especially when you aren't a professional to begin with. Give the man some time to correct his mistakes. You act as if every "article" you guys have written are pieces of perfection...
XS+ said:Isamu banned? Poor guy.
WasabiKing said:As for calling someone unprofessional on a mistake they made on an article, that's ridiculous.
metdroid said:You don't think that a guy who gets paid to play games and then write about them repeating bullshit information he just read off a press release three times in his article is unprofessional???
Tellaerin said:So before reviewing a game, you expect the reviewer to complete every challenge and unlock every single unlockable, just to confirm the information printed in the publisher's press release? Sorry, most reviewers are expected to write more than one review a month. If you want to fault anyone for being unprofessional, it's the MS PR department, since they're the ones who didn't bother fact-checking with Sumo Digital before sending out the press release in the first place.
metdroid said:No, I expect a review based on what the reviewer experienced. If he didn't see an unlocked daytona he should have said "and reports have it that daytona is unlockable" or something. Not "Daytona is in here folks!!" How can we believe that they even play the games if they just rattle off press release quotes.
metdroid said:No, I expect a review based on what the reviewer experienced. If he didn't see an unlocked daytona he should have said "and reports have it that daytona is unlockable" or something. Not "Daytona is in here folks!!" How can we believe that they even play the games if they just rattle off press release quotes.
TheGreenGiant said:STOP THE PRESS.
Perry's little gaff is nothing. Nothing on GMR's Paper Mario review and their policy.
Tellaerin said:I want a review to help me decide whether or not I should purchase a particular title. If the publisher says that feature x is in there, and it's a feature that will potentially affect my purchase, I don't give a damn whether or not the reviewer 'experienced it personally'--I want to hear about it, and not couched in uncertain terms like 'reports have it', either. If the publisher or developer says it's fact, it should be safe to treat as fact--who should be expected to know more about the product, the people responsible for creating and publishing it, or a some reviewer rushing through a possibly-incomplete review copy on a deadline to write his review? Given the circumstances, I can't fault Doug Perry for quoting information from what should be a reliable source as fact, rather than assuming that just because he didn't manage to unlock those extras (or because they weren't present in his reviewable), they wouldn't be in the final at all, despite PR copy to the contrary.
So before reviewing a game, you expect the reviewer to complete every challenge and unlock every single unlockable, just to confirm the information printed in the publisher's press release?
skip said:or...perhaps, he could have contacted the MS PR person to verify what was printed on the press release.
Miburou said:What if the game was included, but was the worst port in the history of ports? Mentioning it three times the way he did, you wouldn't assume that, when in reality he's just repeating what a press release says. Saying "according to MS the game also includes the original Daytona USA although we haven't unlocked it and can't judge its quality" would be the only decent thing to do.
I need more info on this, please.Catalyst said:I've seen worse on here...like that one guy who still bathes with his 10-year-old son lol) and he didn't get banned on his troll-ness.
CVXFREAK said:TheGreenGiant has spoken. ::bows::
TheGreenGiant said:
Nintendo Ate My Children said:I just want to say how much I support banning the aggresively stupid. I can't imagine why anyone would be bothered at all by banning isamu permanently.
TheGreenGiant said:You'd have to be a real SEGA fanatic / retro fanboy to want to play with sprites.