What's so odd about that? When the PS4 and Xbox One came in 2013 they were weaker than a GTX 670 from the year before.PS5 has worse GFX performance than the top Radeon released last year. What a time to be alive.
PS5 has worse GFX performance than the top Radeon released last year. What a time to be alive. Well at least it has some kind of gimped RT which the RX5700XT does not.
Reality Check from Dealer???
Hahah LMAO!!Obviously not true.
in real world condition how many 57000xt (even reference desing) is running at 8.22 tf ?The OP is bullshit.
Non boost perf of 5700XT is 8.22TF
Basically depends on as of yet unknown pricing.
If the PS5 was 399 and the SeX was 499, they'd draw nearly even on performance per dollar, that seems about fair to me. If only Sony had got the BC story down perfectly, with those two things I don't think I would have cared much about this level of power difference, hoping they realize they have work to do and have a better BC story by launch/nearly all titles soon after.
This is of course apart from the obvious that people will chose based on the games they want to play.
3.5ghz, 1.2ghz
1.6-2ghz, 2.23ghz
in real world condition how many 57000xt (even reference desing) is running at 8.22 tf ?
Are these real numbers or are you just taking guesses?
For all the talk of how «meaningless» the number of TF is, Sony had to use every trick imaginable to achieve that double digits number, even if it is just on paper.I prefer Microsoft's transparency to Sony's secret sauce. Everything feels like an inverse to 2013.
seems comon sense to me you don't whine when you hardware can perform better than what is advertised.Dunno. Never seen such benchmarks.
But I do know that all the TF numbers of all the GPUs till now were in "boosted" TFs and nobody was whining.
You'll see.
Smartshift is used in mobile devices where they're limited to a certain TDP. Chips in mobile drops by over 50% in clocks to boost the other parts. It's not something you use for a mere 10% or even 20% variance in clocks.
CPU and GPUs have a optimal sweet spot. Moving past those sweets spots add diminish returns up really quickly.
they have to justify that 16% advantageAre these real numbers or are you just taking guesses?
Why would the GPU ever need to drop below 2Ghz?
seems comon sense to me you don't whine when you hardware can perform better than what is advertised.
the reverse ....not same story
Not true. PS5 has a better SSD. But that's basically it.Don't worry Xbox fans. XSX is better than PS5 in every segment. Even SSD.
He was trolling.Not true. PS5 has a better SSD. But that's basically it.
then why is the advertised frequency not fixed or the minimal guaranted ?And if the reverse never happened, why the concern?
It is actually better in everything but the SSD and when combined with the variable clock speeds that Sony had to use to reach the damned double digits TF number, the difference becomes even bigger.Don't worry Xbox fans. XSX is better than PS5 in every segment. Even SSD.
PlayStation blog:Are these real numbers or are you just taking guesses?
Why would the GPU ever need to drop below 2Ghz?
I guess the slot is directly tied to PCI lane
then why is the advertised frequency not fixed or the minimal guaranted ?
It is actually better in everything but the SSD and when combined with the variable clock speeds that Sony had to use to reach the damned double digits TF number, the difference becomes even bigger.
Are these real numbers or are you just taking guesses?
Why would the GPU ever need to drop below 2Ghz?
I listened to Cerny, I will just wait for an in depth analysis by places like DF WHEN THEY GET THE ACTUAL CONSOLE to draw conclusions, Cerny’s presentation was embarrassing. Compare what he was saying in the ps4 presentation with what he said for the ps5, both presentations are available on Youtube. When he talks about how meaningless TF are and how he dislikes a big number of CU (!!!!!!!!) he legitimately gave me a smile. Silence is golden sometimes.Eh, you should listen what Cerny said yesterday. Both CPU and GPU are at peak most of the time. 2% drops in frequency ( that's around 55 MHz ) are in worst case scenario and it's still at 10.2 TF. What, you want to difference in TF be bigger? Naaah
No, it was done in 2 weeks time, hardly any real usage of XS's features and abilities.I just watched Digital Foundry's analysis of Gears 5 demo on Xbox Series X.
And, my God! That's supposed to be a generational leap? I can barely see the difference! Even side to side.
It's gonna take a lot of brainwashing, and great games, to make the world buy these new consoles for more than $300. Good luck Sony & Microsoft. I wish you both well.
I just watched Digital Foundry's analysis of Gears 5 demo on Xbox Series X.
And, my God! That's supposed to be a generational leap? I can barely see the difference! Even side to side.
It's gonna take a lot of brainwashing, and great games, to make the world buy these new consoles for more than $300. Good luck Sony & Microsoft. I wish you both well.
It is not fixed or guaranteed in any other GPU. Apart from MSFT PR for XSeX.
I'm not saying that MSFT are lying. They may start a new trend of "fixed freq".
But claiming that "unfixed" frequencies is unheard of is... eh...
You do understand that this was just a small presentation of how enhanced BC will work on the XSX and not a presentation of an actual XSX game right ?I just watched Digital Foundry's analysis of Gears 5 demo on Xbox Series X.
And, my God! That's supposed to be a generational leap? I can barely see the difference! Even side to side.
It's gonna take a lot of brainwashing, and great games, to make the world buy these new consoles for more than $300. Good luck Sony & Microsoft. I wish you both well.
I listened to Cerny, I will just wait for an in depth analysis by places like DF WHEN THEY GET THE ACTUAL CONSOLE to draw conclusions, Cerny’s presentation was embarrassing. Compare what he was saying in the ps4 presentation with what he said for the ps5, both presentations are available on Youtube. When he talks about how meaningless TF are and how he dislikes la large number of CU (!!!!!!!!) he legitimately gave me a smile. Silence is golden sometimes.
Think Nintendo Switch!
Cerny is the man responsible for the ps5 , he is not an impartial tech person. Some of the things he said were embarrassing, had a MS tech person said some of this stuff he would have been laughed out of the Internet and rightfully so. Again compare his thesis on console design for the ps4 and for the ps5.Nah, looks like you didn't. So, DF surely know better than Cerny how PS5 is designed? LOL
what is unheard of is advertised best case scenarios you reach but not at the same time to not look bad.
Nah, looks like you didn't. So, DF surely know better than Cerny how PS5 is designed? LOL
They can reach it but not consistently, have you never used a pc graphics card in your life ? Something has to give in, in the pc space too, whether that’s GPU or CPU when it comes to maximum clock speeds or most PCs would explode.Again, all Nvidia and AMD GPUs always advertised max clocks and max TF numbers.
Why they can reach it, but Sony cannot?
Cerny is an employee. Again what did you expect him to say ? The guy said that many CU is a bad thing !!! I have never in my life ever seen this thing being said by ANY tech expert.Not only DF. If you read video game forums from all countries, everyone seems to understand and know much more about PS5 than Cerny overnight. It is better to take it with a lot of humor.
Again, all Nvidia and AMD GPUs always advertised max clocks and max TF numbers.
Why they can reach it, but Sony cannot?
They can reach it but not consistently, have you never used a pc graphics card in your life ? Something has to give in, in the c space too, whether that’s GPU or CPU when it comes to maximum clock speeds or most PCs would explode.
Ask yourself if both the CPU and the GPU can sustain peak clock speeds all the time why Sony, for the first time ever, gave variable clock speeds in its spec sheet .
ok this explain everything. Do you even have a pc ?
You misunderstood. 12GHz!??you will tell me that 3.6ghz and 12.1ghz on xsx can't be reached an sustained at the same time(and if it's the case i misunderstood that part, it's not impossible)
Cerny is an employee. Again what did you expect him to say ? The guy said that many CU is a bad thing !!! I have never in my life ever seen this thing being said by ANY tech expert.
yeah wanted to say tflopsYou misunderstood. 12GHz!??