Pug said:Alpha, read the story, did a search here didn't see it, posted it, Ban me.
AlphaSnake said:Edit: This will be appealed for years on end, folks.
In the ruling handed down Thursday, the federal court also ordered Sony Computer Entertainment and Sony Entertainment America Inc. to stop selling the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 game consoles using Dualshock controllers as well as more than 40 game software products.
Good lord son edit your post and remove all content, THIS IS LIFE OR DEATH SON.Pug said:Alpha believe me if we still had the delete thread option I would use it!
Robert-GCA said:Damn...I wonder how much more debt each year Sony can handle. They aren't exactly raking in enormous profits each year.
n the ruling handed down Thursday, the federal court also ordered Sony Computer Entertainment and Sony Entertainment America Inc. to stop selling the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 game consoles using Dualshock controllers as well as more than 40 game software products. (Kyodo News)
RaymondCarver said:Wow, so how does this affect us now? PS2's and controllers realistically can't be pulled form shelves, can they? I don't think this'll happen, and the would have reached some agreement.
Them, Federal Appeals Court which they can spend a decade or more in if they want, etc.. And if this doesn't seem like its worth Supreme Court consideration, well thats never stopped them before when someone starts picking on the poor unfortunate major corporations.Who are they going to appeal to? The Supreme Court?
TTP said:Can someone please explain me why this doesn't apply to MS nor Nintendo controllers? Did they actually pay the rights to Immersion or what? Thanks.
TTP said:Can someone please explain me why this doesn't apply to MS nor Nintendo controllers? Did they actually pay the rights to Immersion or what? Thanks.
gamergirly said:The news just continues to get worse and worse with Sony. What's up with all the bad luck lately?
Ignatz Mouse said:Didn't you say you *weren't* part of the spin? The only other news I've read about Sony is how well the PSP launch went. Now, that may or may not be true, but it's certainly not bad news, is it?
sp0rsk said:doesnt sound like spin to me, this is not good no matter how you look at it brah.
AlphaSnake said:Here's a hint for many: If you don't post news on this forum, don't start now. Chances are, you're just not fast and it's already been posted. Leave it up to the big boys.
ecliptic said:Sony had a chance to settle all this out of court, but refused. Now they are faced with this. Punishment for their arrogance.
sp0rsk said:doesnt sound like spin to me, this is not good no matter how you look at it brah.
Ignatz Mouse said:This *is* bad news-- it's the reference to all the "bad luck" lately and how the news gets "worse and worse with Sony" coupled with a comment gamegirly made elsewhere about supposedly not spinning the PSP launch into bad news.
Unless he's referring to some other bad news.
Why will the PS3 have a new controller? Sony can't use this way of doing rumble, buy they can use the same design (it's their own). Just like the Dual Shock 1 -> 2, the design is the same but some things are different (like the upgraded rumble motor).Diffense said:Well, at least we know PS3 will have a new controller.![]()
Ignatz Mouse said:Didn't you say you *weren't* part of the spin? The only other news I've read about Sony is how well the PSP launch went. Now, that may or may not be true, but it's certainly not bad news, is it?
turok4n64 said:down with Sony!!
A RULING by a judge that Sony infringed patents from Immersion has led to an order that it stop selling its games machines in the USA.
And, according to the Wall Street Journal, Sony will have to pay $90.7 million to Immersion.
But, the report said, Sony is to defy the ruling by the US court and will carry on selling games machines and won't pay the money.
The paper quotes a Sony exec as saying the firm doesn't agree with the order.
Last week Sony launched its PSP handheld in the States, but that machine isn't part of the lawsuit, said the Journal.
Immersion has already collected $26 million from Microsoft over a previous ruling. We wonder how the judge will react to Sony's defiance of a court order. Normally judges' sense of humour get a little strained when people or companies "don't agree".
mashoutposse said:This will be appealed faster than you can say the word 'appeal'
gamergirly said:Being sued for 90 million dollars and having a possiblity of getting some of your production stopped isnt what we(as in the real world that you're not involved in clearly) call "good news". There's no spin on it all, that's just the way it is.
TTP said:Thank Nerevar and lokii for the clarification (and sorry for having bumped an old news).
Tallaerin, do you have a link or something related to the MS/Immersion arrangement?
Should Sony choose to settle, there may be more than one winner in the case--the other being Microsoft. In 2003, Immersion settled a similar patent-infringement case with Microsoft over its Xbox gaming system. Under terms of that settlement, Microsoft paid Immersion $20 million in cash and took a 9% equity stake, worth $6 million, in the company. It also has an option to convert a $9 million debenture into more Immersion stock.
Moreover, Immersion Chief Executive Victor Viegas says the settlement also includes a sub-license that allows Microsoft to cut license agreements on Immersion's technology with other companies--including Sony. Under such a deal Microsoft would share license revenue. But should Immersion settle with Sony, the latter would be obligated to pay Microsoft a minimum of $15 million. That's pocket change to a company that generates billions in cash every year, but could be viewed as a symbolic victory for Microsoft over Sony.
Viegas says the deal with Microsoft gave it a stronger negotiating position with other companies, and should give it increased leverage with Sony should the two come to the negotiating table.